Qiang Wang vs Nao Hibino Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
Q. Wang vs N. Hibino

Qiang Wang

CHN

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

1.72m

Height

1.63m

826

C. Rank

174

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.9M

Career Money

$1.6M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Nao Hibino

JPN

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

1.72m

Height

1.63m

826

C. Rank

174

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$3.9M

Career Money

$1.6M

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Plays

Right-handed (two-handed backhand)

Head-to-head: Wang 1 - 2 Hibino

They have played 7 sets in total, with Qiang Wang winning 3 and Nao Hibino winning 4. The last match between Nao Hibino and Qiang Wang was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 14-09-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Wang	1
Hibino	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R2) Chennai Open - Chennai(09-14-22)

Stats

Nao Hibino

Qiang Wang

(Q2) U.S. Open - New York(08-25-22)

Stats

Nao Hibino

Qiang Wang

(SF) Kurume(05-12-14)

Stats

Qiang Wang

Nao Hibino

Q. Wang vs N. Hibino H2H Profile

Q. Wang	Stats	N. Hibino
$3,853,637	Career Prize Money	$1,614,842
58.71% (418-294)	Career Total W/L	54.48% (407-340)
1	Grass	0
0	Hard	2
17	Titles	13
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	22.22% (2-7)

Q. Wang vs N. Hibino Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Qiang Wang has won 39.13% of points on their second serve, while Nao Hibino has won 39.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Qiang Wang, in recent form, has won 50.00% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nao Hibino has won 49.89%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.86% and 36.26% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Qiang Wang has saved 50.00% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nao Hibino has saved 47.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Qiang Wang has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/3), with Nao Hibino winning 50.00% (W/L 26/26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Qiang Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 314/196), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/36). Nao Hibino has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 292/223), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 55/66).
Player level: In the last year, Qiang Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/3), where as Nao Hibino has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.52% of matches (W/L 13/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Qiang Wang winning 1 times and Nao Hibino being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Qiang Wang winning 3 and Nao Hibino winning 4.
The last match between Qiang Wang and Nao Hibino was at the Chennai Open - Chennai, 14-09-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Nao Hibino getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:0:28.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Qiang Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 511.33 while Nao Hibino has played against players with an average rank of 238.83.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Qiang Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nao Hibino has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Qiang Wang has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nao Hibino has converted 45.59% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Qiang Wang vs Nao Hibino Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

Q. Wang vs N. Hibino H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Q. Wang	Stats	N. Hibino
1	H2H Matches Won	2
3	Sets Won	4
28	Games Won	34
2	Aces (Total)	2
8	Total Double Faults	3
1:0:28	Average Match Time	1:0:28
67% (87/130)	1st Serve %	58% (71/122)
49% (43/87)	1st Serve Win %	66% (47/71)
28% (12/43)	2nd Serve Win %	43% (22/51)
67% (8/12)	Break Pts Won %	64% (14/22)
43% (53/122)	Return Points Win %	58% (75/130)
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

Q. Wang Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W35 Qian Daohu - 20-10-2025
Q1 Jiayi WangJ. Wang	L	7-6(5) 6-3	Stats
W35 Kunshan - 06-10-2025
R1 Jiaqi WangJ. Wang	L	6-0 6-4	Stats
W35 Shenyang - 15-09-2025
R1 Wushuang ZhengW. Zheng	L	6-4 3-0 ret.	Stats
Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo - 21-10-2024
Q1 Aliaksandra SasnovichA. Sasnovich	L	7-6(4) 6-0	Stats
Japan Open Tennis Championships - Osaka - 14-10-2024
Q1 Jessika PonchetJ. Ponchet	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Hibino Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
W100 Takasaki - 17-11-2025
QF Yeon Woo KuY. Woo	L	3-6 7-5 7-5	Stats
R2 Eri ShimizuE. Shimizu	W	6-3 6-2	Stats
R1 Viktoria MorvayovaV. Morvayova	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
Chennai Open - Chennai - 27-10-2025
R1 Mia PohankovaM. Pohankova	L	7-5 6-1	Stats
Toray Pan Pacific Open - Tokyo - 20-10-2025
Q1 Cristina BucsaC. Bucsa	L	6-3 6-1	Stats

View All

Q. Wang vs N. Hibino Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Q. Wang	Stats	N. Hibino
58.96% (418/291)	YTD Win/Loss	54.48% (407/340)
58.22% (942/676)	Sets Win/Loss	53.01% (908/805)
53.41% (7822/6824)	Games Win/Loss	51.53% (8064/7585)
61.57% (314/196)	Hard Win/Loss	56.70% (292/223)
49.30% (35/36)	Clay Win/Loss	45.45% (55/66)
54.55% (48/40)	Indoor Hard W/L	57.78% (26/19)
52.50% (21/19)	Grass Win/Loss	51.52% (34/32)
0.15	Aces Per Game	0.13
1077	Aces Total	1023
0.14	Double Faults Per Game	0.21
997	Total Double Faults	1612
1st Match	Average Match Time	1:12:54
538.15	Average Opponent Rank	485.97
63% (18169/29059)	1st Serve %	65% (25797/39512)
63% (11484/18169)	1st Serve Win %	61% (15626/25797)
47% (5157/10884)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (6358/13712)
47% (1755/3715)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (2294/4825)
45% (13285/29336)	Return Points Win %	45% (17789/39756)
50.75% (34/33)	Slam W/L	47.56% (39/43)
53.01% (44/39)	Masters W/L	42.42% (28/38)
73.08% (19/7)	Cups W/L	56.25% (9/7)
51.06% (96/92)	Main Tour W/L	48.82% (103/108)
64.29% (198/110)	Challenger W/L	59.48% (204/139)
72.97% (27/10)	Futures W/L	82.76% (24/5)
59% (412/695)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	54% (400/735)
50% (4/8)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	40% (2/5)
49% (61/125)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	57% (87/152)
48% (95/198)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (125/223)
86% (434/373)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (385/331)
14% (434/60)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (385/52)
16% (275/45)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	20% (362/73)