Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Qiang Wang vs Karolina Pliskova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Wang vs Pliskova analysis and find out who is favored!
Qiang Wang vs Karolina Pliskova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Wang has won 40.12% of points on his second serve, while Pliskova has won 40.59%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Wang, in recent form, has won 49.49% of his opponent's second serve points, while Pliskova has won 51.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 46.42% and 34.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Wang has saved 56.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pliskova has saved 67.74% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Wang has won 71.43% of matches played (W/L 5/ 2), with Pliskova winning 47.22% (W/L 17/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 302/ 185), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 35/ 36). Pliskova has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 66% (W/L 61/ 32), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 133/ 100).
- Player level: In the last year, Wang has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 83.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 1), where as Pliskova has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 8/ 8). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Wang winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Wang winning 4 and Pliskova winning 3. The last match between Wang and Pliskova was at the China Open - Beijing, 04-10-2018, Third, Hard with Qiang Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Wang and Pliskova have played a deciding set 1 times, with Wang winning 1 times and Pliskova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Wang winning 0, and Pliskova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Wang has played against opponents with an average rank of 182.14 while Pliskova has played against players with an average rank of 129.89.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Wang has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pliskova has won 41% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Wang has converted 45.59% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pliskova has converted 44.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Wang 2 - 1 Pliskova
806
Rank
12
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
2
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
47
Rank
1
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
59% (406-278)
Career Total W/L
63% (612-353)
71% (5-2)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$3,853,637
Career Prize Money
$18,385,323
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Qiang Wang | Karolina Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 3 |
| Games Won | 30 | 30 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 11 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:30 | 1:31:30 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (126/201) | 64% (139/217) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 56% (71/126) | 63% (88/139) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (35/75) | 40% (31/78) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 41% (12/29) | 61% (11/18) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (98/217) | 47% (95/201) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Qiang Wang
Player
Karolina Pliskova
60%
(
47 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
29 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-1 3-6 6-3 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Karolina Pliskova
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve %
65%
(
68 of
105)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
11
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
11 of
37)
43%
(
9 of
21)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
44 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
59 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
| 6-2 6-1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Qiang Wang
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
9 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Qiang Wang | Karolina Pliskova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (5/2) | 65% (13/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 73% (11/4) | 60% (30/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (76/59) | 52% (250/229) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (5/2) | 54% (7/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.28 | 0.74 |
| Aces Total | 19 | 173 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.55 |
| DFs Total | 9 | 127 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:36:27 | 1:42:22 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 182.14 | 142.95 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (279/441) | 66% (1051/1593) |
| 1st Serve W% | 66% (185/279) | 71% (741/1051) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 40% (65/162) | 41% (220/542) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (31/68) | 44% (72/162) |
| Return Pts W% | 48% (220/461) | 41% (637/1561) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 70% (7/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 83% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (5/7) | 65% (13/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 60% (6/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 83% (6/5) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 17% (6/1) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 40% (10/4) |
Qiang Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Jia-Jing Lu
61%
(
34 of
56)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Wushuang Zheng
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
42%
(
30 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
En Shuo Liang
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve %
52%
(
22 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
13 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
44
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 3-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Han Shi
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
58 of
102)
1st Serve %
63%
(
75 of
120)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
44 of
75)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
44%
(
45 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
59 of
120)
116
Total Points Won
106
|
3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Lanlana Tararudee
68%
(
54 of
80)
1st Serve %
46%
(
39 of
85)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
43 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
78
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Shutong Qu
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
8
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Qiang Wang
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elise Mertens
Player
Qiang Wang
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
2
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
1
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nao Hibino
Player
Qiang Wang
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Qiang Wang
Player
Yanina Wickmayer
80%
(
88 of
110)
1st Serve %
66%
(
46 of
70)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
5
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
8 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
52%
(
57 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Karolina Pliskova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Sloane Stephens
Player
Karolina Pliskova
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
8
59%
(
22 of
37)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Polina Kudermetova
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
12
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
6
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Donna Vekic
Player
Karolina Pliskova
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
9
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
7
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
39 of
59)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
93
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anna Blinkova
Player
Karolina Pliskova
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
91)
3
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
14
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
40 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Karolina Pliskova
72%
(
79 of
109)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
5
Aces
8
9
Double Faults
5
63%
(
50 of
79)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
32 of
55)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
44%
(
48 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
92
Total Points Won
88
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Ashlyn Krueger
72%
(
83 of
116)
1st Serve %
68%
(
70 of
103)
16
Aces
7
9
Double Faults
2
78%
(
65 of
83)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
46 of
70)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
13)
30%
(
35 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
35 of
103)
116
Total Points Won
103
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Shuai Zhang
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
13
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
66)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF | w/o | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Naomi Osaka
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
86)
8
Aces
10
6
Double Faults
2
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
48%
(
11 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
31 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(6) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Linda Noskova
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
57%
(
50 of
88)
12
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
8
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
29 of
50)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
41 of
88)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Wang Vs Pliskova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Qiang Wang
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
