Pranav Kumar vs Warren Wood Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kumar vs Wood analysis and find out who is favored!
Pranav Kumar vs Warren Wood Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kumar has won 44.44% of points on his second serve, while Wood has won 45.65%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kumar, in recent form, has won 47.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wood has won 47.5%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.66% and 29.31% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kumar has saved 44.9% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wood has saved 65.38% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kumar has won 44.83% of matches played (W/L 13/ 16), with Wood winning 56.76% (W/L 21/ 16) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kumar has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 18/ 20), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Wood has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 57/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Kumar has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Wood has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.76% of matches (W/L 21/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kumar has played against opponents with an average rank of 25.62 while Wood has played against players with an average rank of 65.35.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kumar has won 13% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wood has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kumar has converted 48.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wood has converted 52.63% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kumar 0 - 0 Wood
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
45% (22-27)
Career Total W/L
57% (61-46)
55% (6-5)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pranav Kumar | Warren Wood |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 55% (6/5) | 50% (3/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (13/10) | 54% (7/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (106/95) | 50% (65/65) |
Hard Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 50% (3/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0.03 |
Aces Total | 5 | 2 |
DFs per game | 0.29 | 0.06 |
DFs Total | 29 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 106.5 |
1st Serve % | 61% (190/310) | 59% (37/63) |
1st Serve W% | 57% (109/190) | 57% (21/37) |
2nd Serve W% | 42% (50/120) | 27% (7/26) |
BPs Won% Total | 46% (13/28) | 57% (4/7) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (115/287) | 42% (27/65) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 56% (5/4) | 50% (3/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 55% (6/11) | 50% (3/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 75% (4/3) |
1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 25% (4/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Warren Wood Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Stefan Palosi
Player
Warren Wood
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
7 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
5-7 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marcus McDaniel
Player
Warren Wood
48%
(
23 of
48)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
14 of
23)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
46%
(
22 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
54
Total Points Won
56
|
1-6 5-3 ret. | H2H | ||
R2 |
Danil Panarin
Player
Warren Wood
75%
(
6 of
8)
1st Serve %
60%
(
3 of
5)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
6 of
6)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
8)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
12
Total Points Won
1
|
3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Warren Wood
Player
Matias Soto
60%
(
58 of
97)
1st Serve %
57%
(
43 of
75)
9
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
34 of
43)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
30%
(
29 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
23 of
75)
91
Total Points Won
81
|
5-7 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-7(7) 10-6 | H2H |
view more