Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Polina Kudermetova vs Chelsea Fontenel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kudermetova vs Fontenel analysis and find out who is favored!
Polina Kudermetova vs Chelsea Fontenel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kudermetova has won 44.7% of points on his second serve, while Fontenel has won 44.44%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kudermetova, in recent form, has won 55.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fontenel has won 49.23%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40.15% and 35.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kudermetova has saved 56.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fontenel has saved 31.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kudermetova has won 56.76% of matches played (W/L 42/ 32), with Fontenel winning 43.48% (W/L 10/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kudermetova has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 71% (W/L 41/ 17), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2). Fontenel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 38% (W/L 3/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Kudermetova has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23), where as Fontenel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 43.48% of matches (W/L 10/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kudermetova has played against opponents with an average rank of 313.5 while Fontenel has played against players with an average rank of 246.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kudermetova has won 57% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fontenel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kudermetova has converted 48.13% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fontenel has converted 27.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kudermetova 0 - 0 Fontenel
178
Rank
139
High
20
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
788
Rank
752
High
19
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
66% (149-78)
Career Total W/L
46% (26-30)
63% (22-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$127,546
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kudermetova VS Fontenel H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Polina Kudermetova | Chelsea Fontenel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 63% (22/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 61% (51/32) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (413/345) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 75% (12/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 125 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.41 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 151 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:28:39 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 314.91 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 54% (1279/2369) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 68% (864/1279) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (495/1090) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (143/294) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 46% (1100/2403) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 62% (18/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (22/34) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (6/12) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (21/19) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (21/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (14/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Polina Kudermetova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Daria Saville
Player
Polina Kudermetova
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Panna Udvardy
Player
Polina Kudermetova
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
8
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Carole Monnet
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Kristina Mladenovic
47%
(
37 of
79)
1st Serve %
71%
(
71 of
100)
-
Aces
-
7
Double Faults
6
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
78%
(
7 of
9)
54%
(
43 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
58 of
100)
94
Total Points Won
85
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Unknown Player
50%
(
18 of
36)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Karolina Pliskova
Player
Polina Kudermetova
64%
(
63 of
99)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
12
Aces
6
8
Double Faults
6
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
102
Total Points Won
100
|
7-5 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Irina Maria Bara
54%
(
32 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Dalila Jakupovic
58%
(
56 of
97)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
4
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
101
Total Points Won
95
|
7-6(3) 2-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro
Player
Polina Kudermetova
62%
(
69 of
111)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
51%
(
35 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
50%
(
21 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
50%
(
55 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
103
|
2-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Polina Kudermetova
Player
Noma Akugue Noha
63%
(
20 of
32)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
70%
(
14 of
20)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
44%
(
14 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
39
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Chelsea Fontenel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Weronika Baszak
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve %
62%
(
16 of
26)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
36
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Ayumi Miyamoto
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
40 of
57)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Katarina Jokic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
60%
(
51 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
37 of
64)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
1
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
15 of
37)
41%
(
14 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
42%
(
36 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
36 of
64)
85
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Louise Kwong
48%
(
28 of
58)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yasmine Kabbaj
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
70%
(
64 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
1
Aces
4
13
Double Faults
4
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
48%
(
44 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
83
Total Points Won
74
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Ellie Daniels
65%
(
52 of
80)
1st Serve %
58%
(
48 of
83)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
9
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
34 of
48)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
14 of
35)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
36 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
79
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(7) 4-6 10-7 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jade Otway
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
77%
(
40 of
52)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
55
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexandra Vecic
Player
Chelsea Fontenel
81%
(
59 of
73)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
25 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
83
Total Points Won
67
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Chelsea Fontenel
Player
Melany Solange Krywoj
75%
(
57 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
58 of
90)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
51%
(
39 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
50 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kudermetova Vs Fontenel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
