Pijus Vaitiekunas vs Raffael Gasanov Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second serve performance: Vaitiekunas has a slight edge by winning 40.85% of second serve points compared to Gasanov's 38.54%. Is second serve performance a predictor of success? Yes, often it can indicate consistency and resilience under pressure.
• Return game stats: Gasanov outshines in recent form by securing 53.26% of points on opponents' second serves, whereas Vaitiekunas has 48.26%. In first serve returns, Vaitiekunas leads with 30.63%, over Gasanov's 25.66%.
• Pressure situations: Vaitiekunas successfully saves 52.17% of breakpoints, though Gasanov is slightly better at 57.58%. This effectiveness might indicate mental toughness during crucial match moments.
• Match win rate: Over the past year, Vaitiekunas has a higher win percentage at 62.22%, while Gasanov trails with 38.89%, suggesting stronger overall form for Vaitiekunas.
• Surface preference: Vaitiekunas excels on hard courts with a 59% win rate, whereas Gasanov performs best on clay at 44%, but struggles on hard courts with only a 33% win rate.
• Event level impact: Both players frequently compete in $10K level tournaments, but Vaitiekunas shows greater success, winning 62.22% of matches compared to Gasanov's 38.89%.
• Opponent quality: Gasanov has played against slightly higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 143.06, versus Vaitiekunas's opponents who average 161.27 in ranking.
• Deciding set success: Vaitiekunas has a stronger record, winning 50% of deciding sets, while Gasanov manages 33%, indicating Vaitiekunas's ability to perform in tight matches.
• Breakpoint conversion: Vaitiekunas converts 40.91% of opportunities, presenting a more efficient break potential than Gasanov's 30% conversion rate.

Editorial Prediction (August 19, 2025, UTC):

The statistics reveal a well-matched contest between Vaitiekunas and Gasanov, though nuanced differences highlight potential outcomes.

Vaitiekunas demonstrates a slight advantage on hard surfaces, which aligns with the venue's court type. Furthermore, his higher win percentage underscores consistent performance over the past year.

Although Gasanov performs well in returning second serves, his struggles on hard courts paired with less effective breakpoint conversion may hinder his chances.

Vaitiekunas's resilience in deciding sets and superior performance under breakpoint pressure suggests a greater aptitude for high-stakes situations.

Taken together, these indicators position Vaitiekunas as the more likely victor in the upcoming match.