Prediction of Phyllis Satterthwaite vs Cecily Marriott Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Satterthwaite vs C. Marriott

Phyllis Satterthwaite

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

139

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Cecily Marriott

GBR

1

Win

Played

0

Win

139

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Satterthwaite 1 - 0 Marriott

They have played 2 sets in total, with Phyllis Satterthwaite winning 2 and Cecily Marriott winning 0. The last match between Phyllis Satterthwaite and Cecily Marriott was at the Queens Club, 18-06-1923, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Phyllis Satterthwaite getting the victory 6-0 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Satterthwaite	1
Marriott	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4) Queens Club(06-18-23)

Stats

Phyllis Satterthwaite

Cecily Marriott

P. Satterthwaite vs C. Marriott H2H Profile

P. Satterthwaite	Stats	C. Marriott
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
72.66% (529-199)	Career Total W/L	49.82% (141-142)
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Satterthwaite vs C. Marriott Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Phyllis Satterthwaite has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cecily Marriott has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Phyllis Satterthwaite, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cecily Marriott has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Phyllis Satterthwaite has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cecily Marriott has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Phyllis Satterthwaite has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cecily Marriott winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Phyllis Satterthwaite has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 100% (W/L 5/0), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 358/149). Cecily Marriott has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 100% (W/L 21/18), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 51/51).
Player level: In the last year, Phyllis Satterthwaite has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cecily Marriott has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Phyllis Satterthwaite winning 1 times and Cecily Marriott being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Phyllis Satterthwaite winning 2 and Cecily Marriott winning 0.
The last match between Phyllis Satterthwaite and Cecily Marriott was at the Queens Club, 18-06-1923, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Phyllis Satterthwaite getting the victory 6-0 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Phyllis Satterthwaite has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cecily Marriott has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Phyllis Satterthwaite has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cecily Marriott has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Phyllis Satterthwaite has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cecily Marriott has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Phyllis Satterthwaite vs Cecily Marriott Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Satterthwaite vs C. Marriott H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Satterthwaite	Stats	C. Marriott
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	0
12	Games Won	2
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Satterthwaite Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Roland Garros - 18-05-1937
R2 Suzanne PannetierS. Pannetier	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Deauville - 24-08-1936
SF Henriette Morel DevilleH. Morel	L	6-4 RET	Stats
Beaulieu-sur-Mer - 17-02-1936
SF Simonne MathieuS. Mathieu	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Penny DurlacP. Durlac	W	6-0 6-2	Stats
Nice - 10-02-1936
SF Paulette De Saint FerreolP. De	W	6-2 6-4	Stats

View All

C. Marriott Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Llanelly - 07-08-1939
Betty HiltonB. Hilton	L	6-0 6-1	Stats
R4 R JamesR. James	W	6-4 6-4	Stats
East Grinstead - 24-07-1939
R4 Zsuzsa KormoczyZ. Kormoczy	L	6-3 7-5	Stats
R3 J GibbsJ. Gibbs	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Paddington - 01-04-1939
R3 D A DanielsD. A	L	6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

P. Satterthwaite vs C. Marriott Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Satterthwaite	Stats	C. Marriott
72.66% (529/199)	YTD Win/Loss	49.82% (141/142)
75.91% (1018/323)	Sets Win/Loss	51.55% (299/281)
67.27% (7090/3450)	Games Win/Loss	50.98% (2578/2479)
100.00% (5/0)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
70.61% (358/149)	Clay Win/Loss	51.30% (59/56)
78.57% (11/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	37.04% (10/17)
77.01% (134/40)	Grass Win/Loss	50.00% (51/51)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
55.81% (24/19)	Slam W/L	0.00% (0/3)
78% (489/628)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	50% (129/256)
0% (0/1)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/0)
48% (34/71)	Deciding Set Win %	38% (25/65)
96% (498/476)	1st Set Won, Won Match	82% (146/119)
4% (498/22)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	18% (146/26)
11% (142/15)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	10% (113/11)