Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kohlschreiber vs Miralles analysis and find out who is favored!
Philipp Kohlschreiber vs Bernabe Zapata Miralles Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kohlschreiber has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Miralles has won 45.98%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kohlschreiber, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Miralles has won 48.95%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 31.91% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kohlschreiber has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Miralles has saved 54.08% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kohlschreiber has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Miralles winning 34.04% (W/L 16/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kohlschreiber has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 61/ 41), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 96/ 88). Miralles has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 288/ 167), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 42% (W/L 35/ 48).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kohlschreiber winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Kohlschreiber winning 2 and Miralles winning 0. The last match between Kohlschreiber and Miralles was at the Genova Challenger, 05-09-2019, Third, Clay with Philipp Kohlschreiber getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kohlschreiber and Miralles have played a deciding set 0 times, with Kohlschreiber winning 0 times and Miralles 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kohlschreiber winning 0, and Miralles 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kohlschreiber has played against opponents with an average rank of while Miralles has played against players with an average rank of 187.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kohlschreiber has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Miralles has won 10% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kohlschreiber has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Miralles has converted 42.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Kohlschreiber 1 - 0 Miralles
780
Rank
16
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
147
Rank
37
High
27
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
56% (618-476)
Career Total W/L
57% (398-297)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
36% (8-14)
$8,099,880
Career Prize Money
$1,171,255
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Kohlschreiber VS Miralles H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Bernabe Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 14 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:54:11 | 1:54:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (41/75) | 60% (58/97) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (33/41) | 57% (33/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (17/34) | 49% (19/39) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (45/97) | 33% (25/75) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kohlschreiber VS Miralles H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 7-5 |
Stats 
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
41 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
95
Total Points Won
77
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Philipp Kohlschreiber | Bernabe Zapata Miralles |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 36% (8/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (18/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (193/244) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 41 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:44 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 228.23 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 69% (1043/1509) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (607/1043) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (218/466) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 42% (53/126) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 39% (518/1331) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 20% (2/8) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (6/3) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 32% (6/19) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (4/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 8% (13/1) |
Philipp Kohlschreiber Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Philipp Kohlschreiber
66%
(
69 of
104)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
4
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
3
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
32%
(
33 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
108
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(4) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Gregoire Barrere
48%
(
21 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
16 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Philipp Kohlschreiber
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
42 of
68)
8
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
16 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Altmaier
Player
Philipp Kohlschreiber
62%
(
66 of
106)
1st Serve %
76%
(
64 of
84)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
44 of
64)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
38%
(
40 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
84)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Alvarez Varona
Player
Philipp Kohlschreiber
64%
(
86 of
135)
1st Serve %
56%
(
66 of
117)
8
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
4
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
37%
(
18 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
44%
(
59 of
135)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
49 of
117)
125
Total Points Won
127
|
3-6 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pedro Cachin
Player
Philipp Kohlschreiber
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
69)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Carlos Taberner
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
57 of
85)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
44 of
57)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
23 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Jiri Lehecka
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
47 of
67)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
29 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
2-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emil Ruusuvuori
Player
Philipp Kohlschreiber
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
58%
(
33 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
21 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Philipp Kohlschreiber
Player
Denis Kudla
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
5 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
40 of
80)
86
Total Points Won
81
|
0-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Bernabe Zapata Miralles Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gianluca Mager
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve %
62%
(
26 of
42)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
95%
(
21 of
22)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jurij Rodionov
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
9
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
10 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
20%
(
10 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Daniel Rincon
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
37 of
53)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
31 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
77 of
101)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Lorenzo Giustino
85%
(
44 of
52)
1st Serve %
85%
(
28 of
33)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
25%
(
2 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
42%
(
22 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
46
Total Points Won
39
|
7-6(1) ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Billy Harris
73%
(
63 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
36 of
69)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
32 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-5 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Marco Cecchinato
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve %
56%
(
20 of
36)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
46
Total Points Won
21
|
6-1 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Lukas Neumayer
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
43 of
65)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
27 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Benjamin Hassan
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
50%
(
29 of
58)
1st Serve %
67%
(
44 of
66)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Kohlschreiber Vs Miralles Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
