Petra Martic vs Maddison Inglis Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Inglis secures 42.53% of her second serve points, slightly outperforming Martic who achieves 40.03%.
• Return Game Stats: Although Inglis captures 48.13% of her opponent's second serve points, Martic excels with 51.07%. On first serve returns, Martic leads again with 31.62%, compared to Inglis at 28.48%.
• Under Pressure: Inglis saves 48% of breakpoints, whereas Martic is marginally better, saving 50%.
• Overall Performance: Inglis boasts a superior match win rate over the past year at 63.89%, compared to Martic's 45.24%.
• Surface Advantage: Inglis thrives on hard courts with a 62% win rate, whereas Martic struggles more on this surface with a 52% win rate.
• Level of Play: Inglis primarily competes in Challengers/ITF events with a 66.67% success rate, while Martic participates in Main tour matches, achieving a 57.14% win rate.
• Opponent Quality: Martic faces tougher competition, averaging opponents ranked 150.95, as opposed to Inglis's average opponent rank of 271.49.
• Deciding Set Performance: Martic fares better in tight matches, winning 50% of deciding sets, while Inglis claims 42%.
• Break Point Conversion: Martic edges out in breakpoint conversion, succeeding 35.33% of the time, with Inglis close behind at 33.53%.

Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):

In the upcoming match, both players exhibit distinct strengths and areas to improve based on recent statistics. Inglis has a slight edge in second serve performance, indicating a solid foundation in her service games. However, Martic demonstrates considerable prowess in return games, especially on the first serve and second serve returns.

Evaluating their ability to handle pressure, Martic marginally surpasses Inglis in saving breakpoints, a crucial skill in high-stakes moments. Yet, Inglis has shown a stronger overall performance across a wider range of matches this past year.

Surface preferences add another layer to this analysis. Inglis benefits from playing on hard courts, aligning well with her strengths, while Martic generally underperforms on this surface compared to her preferred clay courts.

Considering opponent quality, Martic contends with more formidable competitors, potentially offering her a more challenging preparatory background. Martic's slight advantage in break point conversion and deciding set outcomes may give her an upper hand in critical moments.

Taking into account current trends and match conditions, Martic's experience and sharper skills in tight scenarios could likely lead her to victory in this matchup.