Peter Polansky vs Marius Copil Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Polansky vs Copil analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Polansky vs Marius Copil Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Polansky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Copil has won 51.31%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Polansky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Copil has won 47.21%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 28.14% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Polansky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Copil has saved 57.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Polansky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 3), with Copil winning 51.92% (W/L 27/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Polansky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 82/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 11/ 21). Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 149/ 166).
- Player level: In the last year, Polansky has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Copil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 24/ 22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Polansky winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Polansky winning 2 and Copil winning 1. The last match between Polansky and Copil was at the BNP Paribas Open - Indian Wells, 08-03-2018, First, Hard with Peter Polansky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 3:12:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Polansky and Copil have played a deciding set 1 times, with Polansky winning 1 times and Copil 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Polansky winning 2, and Copil 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Polansky has played against opponents with an average rank of 269 while Copil has played against players with an average rank of 321.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Polansky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Copil has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Polansky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Copil has converted 36.27% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Polansky 1 - 0 Copil
19
Total
0
Mast
4
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
15
Minor
721
Rank
110
High
35
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
367
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
8
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
56% (541-428)
Career Total W/L
54% (506-427)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (8-10)
$541,225
Career Prize Money
$1,305,320
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Peter Polansky | Marius Copil |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 20 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 25 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 3:12:0 | 3:12:0 |
1st Serve % | 56% (70/124) | 51% (66/129) |
1st Serve Win% | 81% (57/70) | 76% (50/66) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (33/54) | 59% (37/63) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (2/7) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Points W% | 33% (42/129) | 27% (34/124) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-7(5) 7-6(12) |
Peter Polansky
Player
Marius Copil
56%
(
70 of
124)
1st Serve %
51%
(
66 of
129)
1
Aces
25
6
Double Faults
3
81%
(
57 of
70)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
50 of
66)
61%
(
33 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
27%
(
34 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
42 of
129)
132
Total Points Won
121
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Peter Polansky | Marius Copil |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 41% (17/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 48% (199/213) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (8/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.67 |
Aces Total | 0 | 135 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 0 | 48 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:37:31 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 304.33 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 58% (687/1176) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 76% (521/687) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 51% (247/489) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 35% (33/95) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 35% (447/1261) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (8/8) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (8/18) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 56% (5/9) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 80% (4/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (8/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (8/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (10/0) |
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
QF |
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H |
view more