Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Polansky vs Kevin Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Polansky vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Polansky vs Kevin Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Polansky has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Kim has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Polansky, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Polansky has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Polansky has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 3), with Kim winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Polansky has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 82/ 59), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 34% (W/L 11/ 21). Kim has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 88/ 60), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 43% (W/L 17/ 23).
- Player level: In the last year, Polansky has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/ 2), where as Kim has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 6 times before with Polansky winning 3 times. They have played 14 sets in total, with Polansky winning 8 and Kim winning 6. The last match between Polansky and Kim was at the Panama City Challenger, 06-07-2012, Quarterfinals, Clay with Peter Polansky getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:33:24.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Polansky and Kim have played a deciding set 2 times, with Polansky winning 0 times and Kim 2 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Polansky winning 3, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Polansky has played against opponents with an average rank of 269 while Kim has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Polansky has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Polansky has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Polansky 3 - 3 Kim
721
Rank
110
High
35
Age
R
Plays
3
Total3
2
Hard2
1
Clay0
0
Indoor1
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
63
High
45
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
56% (541-428)
Career Total W/L
51% (471-461)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$541,225
Career Prize Money
$444,220
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Peter Polansky | Kevin Kim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 3 | 3 |
| Sets Won | 8 | 6 |
| Games Won | 68 | 65 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:33:24 | 0:33:24 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (96/147) | 55% (99/181) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 65% (62/96) | 68% (67/99) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (26/51) | 48% (39/82) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 26% (6/23) | 50% (8/16) |
| Return Points W% | 41% (75/181) | 40% (59/147) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (3/6) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (3/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-4 |
Stats 
Peter Polansky
Player
Kevin Kim
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
25 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
||||
| 6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
53 of
98)
1st Serve %
61%
(
49 of
80)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
51%
(
23 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
37 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
34 of
80)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
| 6-1 6-1 | |||||
| 6-4 1-6 6-3 | |||||
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
| 7-6(2) 7-6(5) | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Polansky | Kevin Kim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Peter Polansky Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Max Purcell
Player
Peter Polansky
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
10
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Thai Kwiatkowski
Player
Peter Polansky
58%
(
21 of
36)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michail Pervolarakis
Player
Peter Polansky
62%
(
16 of
26)
1st Serve %
50%
(
16 of
32)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
40%
(
4 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
38%
(
10 of
26)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
27
Total Points Won
31
|
5-5 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Roberto Quiroz
Player
Peter Polansky
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
36 of
43)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
30 of
38)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
20 of
68)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Peter Polansky
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
26 of
47)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
20 of
26)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Jc Aragone
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Peter Polansky
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
16
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
66
|
2-6 7-6(2) 0-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Polansky
Player
Tennys Sandgren
62%
(
71 of
114)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
9
Aces
26
3
Double Faults
10
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
50 of
60)
58%
(
25 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
0%
(
0 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
38 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
32 of
108)
108
Total Points Won
114
|
3-6 7-6(3) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Inaki Montes-De La Torre
Player
Peter Polansky
63%
(
59 of
93)
1st Serve %
55%
(
62 of
112)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
59%
(
20 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
38%
(
35 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
50 of
112)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Kevin Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Kevin Kim
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
40%
(
18 of
45)
3
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
64%
(
21 of
33)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
6 of
27)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
48%
(
23 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
55
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nils Langer
Player
Kevin Kim
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
52%
(
50 of
97)
15
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
31 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
6-2 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Sebastian Bader
52%
(
33 of
64)
1st Serve %
47%
(
28 of
60)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
21 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marcelo Arevalo
Player
Kevin Kim
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
95%
(
20 of
21)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Eduardo Dischinger
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
43%
(
27 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
7
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Drew B. Lied
Player
Kevin Kim
30%
(
3 of
10)
1st Serve %
100%
(
6 of
6)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
2 of
3)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
43%
(
3 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
9
Total Points Won
7
|
2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kevin Kim
Player
Peter Tarwid
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve %
46%
(
26 of
56)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
9
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
9 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Robert Farah
Player
Kevin Kim
63%
(
65 of
103)
1st Serve %
51%
(
55 of
108)
18
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
2
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
105
Total Points Won
106
|
7-5 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jose Fernando Carvajal Torres
Player
Kevin Kim
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve %
50%
(
11 of
22)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
58%
(
11 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
7 of
11)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
43%
(
13 of
30)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
27
Total Points Won
25
|
3-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Wayne Odesnik
Player
Kevin Kim
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
11
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
90%
(
28 of
31)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
16 of
21)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Polansky Vs Kim Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
