M. Arnaldi
To Win
N. Djokovic
To Win
Pedro Martinez Portero vs Matteo Arnaldi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W L W L W L L
Form
L L W W L W L L L WHead-2-Head: Portero 1 - 1 Arnaldi
They have played 4 sets in total, with Portero winning 2 and Arnaldi winning 2. The last match between Portero and Arnaldi was at the Hamburg Open - Hamburg, 15-07-2024, First, Clay with Pedro Martinez Portero getting the victory 7-6(4) 6-1.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Pedro Martinez Portero | 1 |
| Matteo Arnaldi | 1 |
Hamburg Open - Hamburg(15-07-2024)
7
6
6
1
| Portero | Stats | Arnaldi |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (10-14) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (9-9) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 48 | Ranking | 44 |
| 36 | Highest Rank | 30 |
| 27 | Age | 24 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 16 | Titles | 6 |
| 60% (453-299) | Career Total W/L | 61% (225-143) |
| $2,457,065 | Career Prize Money | $2,239,275 |
| 1 | Clay H2H | 1 |
Upcoming Match
26 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sabalenka VS Blinkova PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Fritz VS O'Connell PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(4) 6-1 |
Stats 
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
7
3
Double Faults
4
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
37%
(
7 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
||||
| 7-6(4) 7-5 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
71%
(
75 of
105)
12
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
47 of
75)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
27 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
45 of
105)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 24 | Games Won | 21 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 19 |
| 13 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 2:2:26 | Average Match Time | 2:2:26 |
| 72% (124/173) | 1st Serve % | 58% (81/139) |
| 65% (80/124) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (59/81) |
| 41% (20/49) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (22/58) |
| 54% (7/13) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 60% (6/10) |
| 42% (58/139) | Return Points Win % | 42% (73/173) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Pedro Martinez Portero Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Francisco Comesana
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
71%
(
47 of
66)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
84)
16
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Arthur Fils
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
49%
(
25 of
51)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
18 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Brandon Nakashima
68%
(
79 of
117)
1st Serve %
63%
(
72 of
114)
2
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
1
67%
(
53 of
79)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
48 of
72)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
44 of
114)
116
Total Points Won
115
|
7-5 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nuno Borges
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
59%
(
67 of
113)
1st Serve %
71%
(
94 of
132)
10
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
67%
(
45 of
67)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
57 of
94)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
55 of
132)
126
Total Points Won
119
|
7-5 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
12 of
34)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
87)
77
Total Points Won
76
|
6-4 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
69%
(
22 of
32)
0
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
38%
(
15 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
45
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Stan Wawrinka
80%
(
80 of
100)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
97)
0
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
60%
(
48 of
80)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
31 of
55)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
45 of
97)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
54%
(
22 of
41)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
97%
(
30 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
14 of
22)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
32
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Corentin Moutet
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
55%
(
32 of
58)
1st Serve %
64%
(
42 of
66)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fabian Marozsan
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
10
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Matteo Arnaldi Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Borna Coric
51%
(
49 of
97)
1st Serve %
70%
(
74 of
106)
13
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
54 of
74)
56%
(
27 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
106)
103
Total Points Won
100
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Korda
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
62%
(
46 of
74)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
48%
(
48 of
99)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
1
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
40 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tomas Machac
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
61%
(
45 of
74)
5
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Yibing Wu
55%
(
50 of
91)
1st Serve %
74%
(
84 of
114)
16
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
0
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
84)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
26 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
114)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
18%
(
8 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Andrey Rublev
43%
(
30 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
57%
(
17 of
30)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
55%
(
22 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
31 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Arnaldi
Player
Aleksandar Kovacevic
58%
(
61 of
106)
1st Serve %
58%
(
53 of
92)
7
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
39%
(
41 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
36 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
97
|
6-3 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
8
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
49 of
63)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
43 of
55)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
28 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
28%
(
24 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
6-7(2) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Alejandro Davidovich Fokina
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
26 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60% (453/299) | Win/Loss | 61% (225/143) |
| 57% (1011/749) | Sets Win/Loss | 59% (524/364) |
| 53% (8699/7727) | Games Win/Loss | 53% (4453/3954) |
| 50% (69/68) | Hard Win/Loss | 63% (80/47) |
| 65% (360/197) | Clay Win/Loss | 66% (126/66) |
| 45% (20/24) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (15/26) |
| 29% (4/10) | Grass Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) |
| 0.13 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 1075 | Aces Total | 1432 |
| 0.31 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2514 | Total Double Faults | 1025 |
| 1:38:13 | Average Match Time | 1:43:46 |
| 411.68 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.84 |
| 66% (30953/47218) | 1st Serve % | 59% (14961/25345) |
| 65% (20180/30953) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (10196/14961) |
| 48% (7877/16269) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (5212/10379) |
| 44% (2361/5351) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1088/2516) |
| 43% (20194/47504) | Return Points Win % | 40% (9990/24815) |
| 55% (32/26) | Slam W/L | 61% (17/11) |
| 33% (16/32) | Masters W/L | 57% (26/20) |
| 50% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 80% (4/1) |
| 50% (73/73) | Main Tour W/L | 48% (26/28) |
| 60% (144/95) | Challenger W/L | 60% (73/49) |
| 72% (187/71) | Futures W/L | 70% (78/33) |
| 61% (428/704) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 62% (210/340) |
| 44% (14/32) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 46% (11/24) |
| 55% (112/205) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 57% (67/118) |
| 56% (127/225) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (63/123) |
| 87% (438/381) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (227/189) |
| 13% (438/56) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (227/38) |
| 22% (314/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (140/34) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
