Pedja Krstin vs Cem Ilkel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Krstin vs C. Ilkel

Pedja Krstin
SRB
w
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
30
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
877
C. Rank
586
159
Best Rank
144
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$192.9K
Career Money
$225.5K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Cem Ilkel
TUR
w
l
w
w
w
l
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
30
6'0" (183 cm)
Height
6'0" (183 cm)
877
C. Rank
586
159
Best Rank
144
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$192.9K
Career Money
$225.5K
Right-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Krstin 1 - 0 Ilkel
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pedja Krstin winning 2 and Cem Ilkel winning 0. The last match between Pedja Krstin and Cem Ilkel was at the Nigeria F4 (Lagos), 13-10-2017, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Pedja Krstin getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Krstin | 1 |
| Ilkel | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) Nigeria F4 (Lagos)(10-13-17)
Pedja Krstin
6
6
Cem Ilkel
4
4
P. Krstin vs C. Ilkel H2H Profile
P. Krstin vs C. Ilkel Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pedja Krstin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Cem Ilkel has won 67.50%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pedja Krstin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Cem Ilkel has won 45.90%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 14.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pedja Krstin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Cem Ilkel has saved 66.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pedja Krstin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Cem Ilkel winning 71.43% (W/L 30/12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pedja Krstin has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 195/160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/3). Cem Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 288/181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/9).
- Player level: In the last year, Pedja Krstin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Cem Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 76.32% of matches (W/L 29/9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pedja Krstin winning 1 times and Cem Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pedja Krstin winning 2 and Cem Ilkel winning 0.
- The last match between Pedja Krstin and Cem Ilkel was at the Nigeria F4 (Lagos), 13-10-2017, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Pedja Krstin getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pedja Krstin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Cem Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 424.21.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pedja Krstin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Cem Ilkel has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pedja Krstin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Cem Ilkel has converted 12.50% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Pedja Krstin vs Cem Ilkel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Krstin vs C. Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 8 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:17:0 | Average Match Time | 1:17:0 |
| 53% (27/51) | 1st Serve % | 53% (34/64) |
| 81% (22/27) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (25/34) |
| 67% (16/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (11/30) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 44% (28/64) | Return Points Win % | 25% (13/51) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Krstin 0%, Ilkel 58%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Krstin 0%, Ilkel 52%.
Break Points Saved %: Krstin 0%, Ilkel 61%.
P. Krstin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-1 1-0 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 3-6 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-7(5) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(3) 3-2 ret. | ||
C. Ilkel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | L | 7-6(4) 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 6-4 | ||
SF | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||

P. Krstin vs C. Ilkel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.70% (319/275) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.52% (438/337) |
| 54.13% (727/616) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.63% (979/813) |
| 51.63% (6308/5909) | Games Win/Loss | 51.54% (8791/8267) |
| 53.71% (94/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.41% (288/181) |
| 54.93% (195/160) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.53% (57/71) |
| 49.18% (30/31) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.76% (92/76) |
| 0.00% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 10.00% (1/9) |
| 0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.34 |
| 1458 | Aces Total | 2865 |
| 0.27 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1617 | Total Double Faults | 1385 |
| 1:3:33 | Average Match Time | 1:15:9 |
| 579.07 | Average Opponent Rank | 560.68 |
| 57% (16017/27953) | 1st Serve % | 58% (24152/41308) |
| 69% (10990/16017) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (16999/24152) |
| 48% (5678/11936) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (8757/17156) |
| 44% (1182/2684) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1622/4023) |
| 39% (10504/27020) | Return Points Win % | 39% (16247/41803) |
| 40.00% (10/15) | Slam W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 66.67% (2/1) |
| 100.00% (2/0) | Cups W/L | 31.82% (7/15) |
| 48.48% (16/17) | Main Tour W/L | 17.86% (5/23) |
| 40.57% (114/167) | Challenger W/L | 52.23% (176/161) |
| 70.24% (177/75) | Futures W/L | 66.39% (241/122) |
| 54% (312/576) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (426/756) |
| 17% (1/6) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (4/10) |
| 49% (65/133) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (147/275) |
| 44% (71/162) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (130/233) |
| 81% (347/282) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (424/362) |
| 19% (347/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (424/60) |
| 14% (246/35) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (350/74) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Mon, 24 Nov, 08:00 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 09:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 05:50 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionMon, 24 Nov, 03:30 AM
PredictionSun, 23 Nov, 05:50 AM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

22 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Leolia Jeanjean vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
20:10
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
22:00
H2H 0-0
22:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Hersonissos 7 Challenger
Greece
Islamabad Challenger
Pakistan
Maia Challenger
Portugal
Manama 2 Challenger
Bahrain
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Playford Challenger
Australia
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Phan Thiet
Vietnam
M15 Tallahassee
United States
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Bhopal
India
M25 Heraklion
Greece