Prediction of Pavel Snobel vs Farrukh Dustov Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Snobel vs F. Dustov

Pavel Snobel
CZE
l
w
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
45
Age
39
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'4" (193 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
154
Best Rank
98
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$59.1K
Career Money
$76.8K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed

Farrukh Dustov
UZB
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
l
l
2
Win
3
Played
1
Win
45
Age
39
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'4" (193 cm)
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
154
Best Rank
98
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$59.1K
Career Money
$76.8K
Left-Handed
Plays
Right-Handed
Head-to-head: Snobel 2 - 1 Dustov
They have played 8 sets in total, with Pavel Snobel winning 5 and Farrukh Dustov winning 3. The last match between Pavel Snobel and Farrukh Dustov was at the Samsung Challenger 2007 - Ho Chi Minh City, 18-03-2007, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Pavel Snobel getting the victory 6-3 7-6(3).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Snobel | 2 |
| Dustov | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(F) Samsung Challenger 2007 - Ho Chi Minh City(03-18-07)
Pavel Snobel
6
7
Farrukh Dustov
3
6
(R1) Memorial Manfredini - Sassuolo(06-06-06)
Farrukh Dustov
6
3
6
Pavel Snobel
2
6
1
(QF) Samarkand Challenger - Samarkand(08-19-04)
Pavel Snobel
6
6
6
Farrukh Dustov
7
3
2
P. Snobel vs F. Dustov H2H Profile
P. Snobel vs F. Dustov Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pavel Snobel has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Farrukh Dustov has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pavel Snobel, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Farrukh Dustov has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Pavel Snobel has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Farrukh Dustov has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Pavel Snobel has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Farrukh Dustov winning 0% (W/L 0/) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Pavel Snobel has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 51/34), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 48% (W/L 13/14). Farrukh Dustov has their best career surface win % on , winning 60% (W/L /), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L /).
- Player level: In the last year, Pavel Snobel has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Farrukh Dustov has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Pavel Snobel winning 2 times and Farrukh Dustov being victorious 1 times. They have played 8 sets in total, with Pavel Snobel winning 5 and Farrukh Dustov winning 3.
- The last match between Pavel Snobel and Farrukh Dustov was at the Samsung Challenger 2007 - Ho Chi Minh City, 18-03-2007, Round: F, Surface: Hard, with Pavel Snobel getting the victory 6-3 7-6(3).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Pavel Snobel and Farrukh Dustov have played a deciding set 2 times, with Pavel Snobel winning 1 times and Farrukh Dustov 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Pavel Snobel winning 1, and Farrukh Dustov 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pavel Snobel has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Farrukh Dustov has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pavel Snobel has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Farrukh Dustov has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Pavel Snobel has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Farrukh Dustov has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Pavel Snobel vs Farrukh Dustov Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Snobel vs F. Dustov H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Snobel 0%, Dustov 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Snobel 0%, Dustov 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Snobel 0%, Dustov 0%.
P. Snobel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-1 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
F. Dustov Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||

P. Snobel vs F. Dustov Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 54.37% (255/214) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.71% (369/331) |
| 53.83% (583/500) | Sets Win/Loss | 51.75% (872/813) |
| 51.42% (5250/4961) | Games Win/Loss | 50.76% (8187/7941) |
| 56.30% (76/59) | Hard Win/Loss | 47.75% (85/93) |
| 50.00% (78/78) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.23% (173/146) |
| 58.28% (88/63) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (100/75) |
| 48.15% (13/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 39.29% (11/17) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 133 | Aces Total | 2004 |
| 0.02 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.07 |
| 113 | Total Double Faults | 585 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 562.04 | Average Opponent Rank | 624.29 |
| 58% (1402/2405) | 1st Serve % | 69% (15853/22881) |
| 67% (939/1402) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (11247/15853) |
| 49% (488/1001) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (3348/7028) |
| 42% (80/191) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 37% (685/1845) |
| 37% (840/2247) | Return Points Win % | 36% (8086/22631) |
| 44.44% (16/20) | Slam W/L | 29.63% (8/19) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 36.67% (11/19) |
| 45.00% (9/11) | Main Tour W/L | 46.15% (30/35) |
| 50.16% (153/152) | Challenger W/L | 54.16% (241/204) |
| 71.30% (77/31) | Futures W/L | 61.42% (78/49) |
| 55% (248/449) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (357/657) |
| 29% (4/14) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (11/33) |
| 48% (70/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (149/267) |
| 54% (74/138) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (140/248) |
| 85% (252/214) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (358/294) |
| 14% (252/35) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (358/61) |
| 19% (216/41) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (342/77) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction07:30 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction03:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction09:00 PM 18/11/25
Prediction04:30 PM 18/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

18 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

16 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
Top Predictions Today
12:35
H2H 0-0
13:12
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
13:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal