Paula Ortega Redondo vs Maria Jespersen Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Redondo vs Jespersen analysis and find out who is favored!
Paula Ortega Redondo vs Maria Jespersen Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Redondo has won 51.35% of points on his second serve, while Jespersen has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Redondo, in recent form, has won 66.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jespersen has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 40% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Redondo has saved 55.56% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jespersen has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Redondo has won 32.14% of matches played (W/L 9/ 19), with Jespersen winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Redondo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 29% (W/L 15/ 36), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 27% (W/L 14/ 38). Jespersen has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 13/ 8), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 30% (W/L 3/ 7).
- Player level: In the last year, Redondo has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 36.36% of matches (W/L 8/ 14), where as Jespersen has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Redondo has played against opponents with an average rank of 40.29 while Jespersen has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Redondo has won 11% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jespersen has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Redondo has converted 35.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jespersen has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Redondo 0 - 0 Jespersen
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
28% (30-76)
Career Total W/L
55% (29-24)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
w/o |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Paula Ortega Redondo | Maria Jespersen |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 43% (49/65) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 25% (1/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Paula Ortega Redondo Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 3-6 7-5 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 1-6 6-1 14-12 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-5 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Patricija Paukstyte
Player
Paula Ortega Redondo
80%
(
70 of
88)
1st Serve %
65%
(
69 of
106)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
42 of
70)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
45%
(
40 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 4-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 4-6 6-1 10-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Maria Jespersen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF |
Alice Rame
Player
Maria Jespersen
76%
(
62 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
0
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
8
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
35 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
37 of
74)
84
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(4) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
R2 |
Monika Kilnarova
Player
Maria Jespersen
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
10
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
18 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 | 3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more