Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Peyton Stearns Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gibert vs Stearns analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Paula Badosa Gibert vs Peyton Stearns Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gibert 0 - 0 Stearns
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gibert has won 47.52% of points on their second serve, while Stearns has won 49.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gibert, in recent form, has won 56.36% of their opponent's second serve points, while Stearns has won 55.27%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.65% and 39.38% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gibert has saved 66.14% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stearns has saved 53.7% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gibert has won 53.57% of matches played (W/L 15/ 13), with Stearns winning 49.02% (W/L 25/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gibert has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 167/ 89), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 18/ 13). Stearns has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 70% (W/L 14/ 6), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 2/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Gibert has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 50% of matches (W/L 5/ 5), where as Stearns has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 47.06% of matches (W/L 8/ 9). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gibert has played against opponents with an average rank of 213.29 while Stearns has played against players with an average rank of 125.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gibert has won 62% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stearns has won 35% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gibert has converted 46.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stearns has converted 49.22% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
93
Rank
2
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
52
Rank
43
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
Form
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
L
L
64% (350-197)
Career Total W/L
60% (148-98)
54% (14-12)
YTD W/L
50% (15-15)
$5,193,999
Career Prize Money
$867,199
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Paula Badosa Gibert vs Peyton Stearns For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gibert VS Stearns
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paula Badosa Gibert | Peyton Stearns |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (14/12) | 50% (15/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 54% (34/29) | 52% (40/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (303/281) | 51% (367/351) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 45% (5/6) | 27% (3/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 69% (11/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 75% (3/1) | 33% (1/2) |
| Aces pg | 0.35 | 0.18 |
| Aces Total | 99 | 63 |
| DFs per game | 0.47 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 133 | 88 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:20 | 1:52:59 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 225.81 | 105.83 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1183/2008) | 67% (1617/2430) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (787/1183) | 59% (951/1617) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (392/825) | 48% (394/813) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (96/206) | 48% (130/269) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (798/1878) | 45% (1022/2277) |
| Slam W/L | 71% (5/2) | 40% (2/3) |
| Masters W/L | 50% (5/5) | 38% (3/5) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 44% (4/5) | 55% (6/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (14/23) | 50% (15/30) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 62% (8/13) | 41% (7/17) |
| 1st set W, W | 64% (11/7) | 76% (17/13) |
| 1st set W, L | 36% (11/4) | 24% (17/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 47% (15/7) | 15% (13/2) |
Paula Badosa Gibert Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Karolina Muchova
51%
(
38 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diana Shnaider
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
34 of
53)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
85
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Jule Niemeier
53%
(
41 of
78)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
79)
3
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
12
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
87
Total Points Won
70
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Arantxa Rus
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
7
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Aryna Sabalenka
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
40 of
67)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
20 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
21 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Yulia Putintseva
74%
(
69 of
93)
1st Serve %
62%
(
49 of
79)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
33 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
93
Total Points Won
79
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Katie Boulter
71%
(
68 of
96)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
6
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
9
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Cori Gauff
Player
Paula Badosa Gibert
38%
(
38 of
100)
1st Serve %
53%
(
48 of
90)
3
Aces
2
11
Double Faults
9
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
45%
(
28 of
62)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
43 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Diana Shnaider
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
56%
(
60 of
108)
2
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paula Badosa Gibert
Player
Emma Navarro
65%
(
58 of
89)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Peyton Stearns Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Daria Saville
Player
Peyton Stearns
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
23 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
69
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emma Navarro
Player
Peyton Stearns
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
61%
(
28 of
46)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
84%
(
16 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Julia Stusek
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
69)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
11 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Mirra Andreeva
Player
Peyton Stearns
65%
(
36 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
40%
(
22 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Daria Kasatkina
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve %
74%
(
48 of
65)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
31 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Lucija Ciric Bagaric
66%
(
80 of
122)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
0
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
6
58%
(
46 of
80)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
47%
(
57 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
101)
117
Total Points Won
106
|
6-3 6-7(8) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Mayar Sherif
78%
(
43 of
55)
1st Serve %
74%
(
31 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Viktoriya Tomova
72%
(
94 of
131)
1st Serve %
63%
(
85 of
134)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
48 of
85)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
43%
(
56 of
131)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
64 of
134)
139
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(6) 7-5 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Lucia Bronzetti
77%
(
88 of
115)
1st Serve %
70%
(
79 of
113)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
51%
(
45 of
88)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
41 of
79)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
9 of
22)
Break Points Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
50%
(
58 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
61 of
113)
118
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peyton Stearns
Player
Xiyu Wang
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gibert Vs Stearns Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gibert are available here and Stearns photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Paula Badosa Gibert
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
