Prediction of Paul Mcnamee vs Roscoe Tanner Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
P. Mcnamee vs R. Tanner

Paul Mcnamee

AUS

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Roscoe Tanner

USA

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Mcnamee 1 - 2 Tanner

They have played 7 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 2 and Roscoe Tanner winning 5. The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Roscoe Tanner was at the Queens Club, 06-06-1983, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-3 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Mcnamee	1
Tanner	2

Last 3 H2H Matches:

(R2) Queens Club(06-06-83)

Stats

Paul Mcnamee

Roscoe Tanner

(SF) Bristol(06-13-81)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Paul Mcnamee

(R3) Wimbledon(06-23-80)

Stats

Roscoe Tanner

Paul Mcnamee

P. Mcnamee vs R. Tanner H2H Profile

P. Mcnamee	Stats	R. Tanner
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
52.74% (260-233)	Career Total W/L	66.67% (604-302)
1	Grass	2
4	Titles	17
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

P. Mcnamee vs R. Tanner Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Roscoe Tanner has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Mcnamee, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Roscoe Tanner has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Paul Mcnamee has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Roscoe Tanner has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Roscoe Tanner winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Paul Mcnamee has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 63/49), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 47% (W/L 35/39). Roscoe Tanner has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 56% (W/L 116/42), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 62% (W/L 98/59).
Player level: In the last year, Paul Mcnamee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Roscoe Tanner has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Paul Mcnamee winning 1 times and Roscoe Tanner being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Paul Mcnamee winning 2 and Roscoe Tanner winning 5.
The last match between Paul Mcnamee and Roscoe Tanner was at the Queens Club, 06-06-1983, Round: R2, Surface: Grass, with Paul Mcnamee getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Mcnamee has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Roscoe Tanner has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Mcnamee has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Roscoe Tanner has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Mcnamee has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Roscoe Tanner has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Paul Mcnamee vs Roscoe Tanner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Mcnamee vs R. Tanner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

P. Mcnamee	Stats	R. Tanner
1	H2H Matches Won	2
2	Sets Won	5
34	Games Won	37
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑5 Win %	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (2/2)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/2)
0% (0/2)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

P. Mcnamee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Australian Open - 11-01-1988
R1 Bill ScanlonB. Scanlon	W	6-3 6-3 6-3	Stats
R2 Sammy Giammalva JrS. Giammalva	W	6-7 7-6 6-2 4-1 RET	Stats
R3 Pat CashP. Cash	L	6-1 6-2 6-1	Stats
Adelaide - 28-12-1987
R3 Charles Bud CoxC. Bud	W	6-1 6-2	Stats
R4 Wally MasurW. Masur	L	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

R. Tanner Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Memphis - 28-01-1985
R2 Zoltan KuharszkyZ. Kuharszky	L	7-5 6-7 6-4	Stats
Tel Aviv - 10-09-1984
R3 Amos MansdorfA. Mansdorf	L	6-4 7-6	Stats
US Open - 28-08-1984
R1 Matt DoyleM. Doyle	L	6-2 6-2 6-4	Stats
Cincinnati - 20-08-1984
R2 Jimmy ConnorsJ. Connors	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
Columbus - 13-08-1984
R3 Tim GulliksonT. Gullikson	L	5-7 6-2 6-1	Stats

View All

P. Mcnamee vs R. Tanner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

P. Mcnamee	Stats	R. Tanner
52.74% (260/233)	YTD Win/Loss	66.67% (604/302)
51.88% (662/614)	Sets Win/Loss	63.03% (1439/844)
50.55% (6201/6067)	Games Win/Loss	54.41% (12342/10342)
47.30% (35/39)	Hard Win/Loss	66.98% (215/106)
53.16% (126/111)	Clay Win/Loss	62.42% (98/59)
51.43% (36/34)	Indoor Hard W/L	64.66% (161/88)
56.25% (63/49)	Grass Win/Loss	73.42% (116/42)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
527.71	Average Opponent Rank	549.44
53.57% (45/39)	Slam W/L	73.17% (90/33)
48.00% (12/13)	Masters W/L	54.39% (31/26)
64.71% (11/6)	Cups W/L	69.23% (9/4)
50.57% (178/174)	Main Tour W/L	66.48% (474/239)
93.33% (14/1)	Challenger W/L	0% (0/0)
53% (204/387)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	67% (505/759)
54% (55/102)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	67% (90/134)
0% (0/0)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	39% (15/38)
52% (74/143)	Deciding Set Win %	56% (161/288)
86% (258/221)	1st Set Won, Won Match	86% (596/514)
14% (258/36)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	14% (596/82)
17% (234/40)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	28% (299/83)