Prediction of Paul Chamberlin vs Joakim Nystrom Head-to-Head, At
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Chamberlin vs J. Nystrom

Paul Chamberlin
USA
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
63
Age
62
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
49
Best Rank
7
0
Total Titles
13
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-

Joakim Nystrom
SWE
l
l
l
l
w
w
w
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
63
Age
62
5'10" (178 cm)
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
49
Best Rank
7
0
Total Titles
13
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Chamberlin 1 - 0 Nystrom
They have played 5 sets in total, with Paul Chamberlin winning 3 and Joakim Nystrom winning 2. The last match between Paul Chamberlin and Joakim Nystrom was at the Australian Open, 16-01-1989, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Chamberlin getting the victory 6-2 4-6 3-6 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Chamberlin | 1 |
| Nystrom | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Australian Open(01-16-89)
Paul Chamberlin
6
4
3
6
6
Joakim Nystrom
2
6
6
2
4
P. Chamberlin vs J. Nystrom H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 47.06% (80-90) | Career Total W/L | 64.68% (271-148) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 13 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Chamberlin vs J. Nystrom Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Paul Chamberlin has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Joakim Nystrom has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Paul Chamberlin, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Joakim Nystrom has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Paul Chamberlin has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Joakim Nystrom has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Paul Chamberlin has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Joakim Nystrom winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Paul Chamberlin has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 59% (W/L 17/12), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 33% (W/L 2/4). Joakim Nystrom has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 60/31), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 62% (W/L 23/14).
- Player level: In the last year, Paul Chamberlin has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Joakim Nystrom has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Paul Chamberlin winning 1 times and Joakim Nystrom being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Paul Chamberlin winning 3 and Joakim Nystrom winning 2.
- The last match between Paul Chamberlin and Joakim Nystrom was at the Australian Open, 16-01-1989, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Paul Chamberlin getting the victory 6-2 4-6 3-6 6-2 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Paul Chamberlin has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Joakim Nystrom has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Paul Chamberlin has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Joakim Nystrom has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Paul Chamberlin has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Joakim Nystrom has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Paul Chamberlin vs Joakim Nystrom Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Chamberlin vs J. Nystrom H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 25 | Games Won | 20 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑5 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Chamberlin 0%, Nystrom 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Chamberlin 0%, Nystrom 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Chamberlin 0%, Nystrom 0%.
P. Chamberlin Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 7-5 | ||
R1 | L | 7-5 6-2 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 7-6 6-1 | ||
J. Nystrom Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R3 | L | 6-1 4-6 6-0 | ||
R4 | W | 2-6 7-6 7-5 | ||
R3 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
QF | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R3 | W | 6-2 6-4 | ||

P. Chamberlin vs J. Nystrom Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 47.06% (80/90) | YTD Win/Loss | 64.68% (271/148) |
| 47.94% (198/215) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.51% (668/436) |
| 49.17% (1976/2043) | Games Win/Loss | 54.37% (5528/4640) |
| 50.00% (55/55) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.93% (60/31) |
| 33.33% (2/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.35% (149/79) |
| 24.00% (6/19) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.90% (39/24) |
| 58.62% (17/12) | Grass Win/Loss | 62.16% (23/14) |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 297.65 | Average Opponent Rank | 364.06 |
| 55.56% (10/8) | Slam W/L | 64.38% (47/26) |
| 27.27% (3/8) | Masters W/L | 59.62% (31/21) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 57.14% (4/3) |
| 46.32% (44/51) | Main Tour W/L | 66.06% (183/94) |
| 50.00% (23/23) | Challenger W/L | 60.00% (6/4) |
| 47% (70/148) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 66% (214/324) |
| 48% (10/21) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 61% (57/93) |
| 44% (19/43) | Deciding Set Win % | 65% (82/127) |
| 81% (85/69) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (243/219) |
| 19% (85/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (243/24) |
| 13% (84/11) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 30% (174/52) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
07:00 AM 17/11/25
Prediction09:20 PM 16/11/25
Prediction12:00 PM 17/11/25
Prediction11:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction10:00 PM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 AM 17/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
16 Nov 2025
Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Iga Swiatek vs Gabriela Lee Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group B – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Jannik Sinner Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Ella Seidel vs Hanne Vandewinkel Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group F – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
16 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Sinner H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
20:05
H2H 10-5
18:45
H2H 1-0
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Nitto ATP Finals - Turin
Italy
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal