Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Paul Capdeville vs Nikola Ciric Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Capdeville vs Ciric analysis and find out who is favored!
Paul Capdeville vs Nikola Ciric Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Capdeville has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ciric has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Capdeville, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ciric has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Capdeville has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ciric has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Capdeville has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ciric winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Capdeville has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 137/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 32% (W/L 7/ 15). Ciric has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 283/ 169), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Capdeville winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Capdeville winning 2 and Ciric winning 1. The last match between Capdeville and Ciric was at the Buenos Aires Challenger, 08-11-2011, First, Clay with Paul Capdeville getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:1:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Capdeville and Ciric have played a deciding set 1 times, with Capdeville winning 1 times and Ciric 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Capdeville winning 0, and Ciric 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Capdeville has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ciric has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Capdeville has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ciric has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Capdeville has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ciric has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Capdeville 1 - 0 Ciric
Ret.
Rank
76
High
41
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
151
High
40
Age
L
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
56% (393-303)
Career Total W/L
59% (298-209)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$467,483
Career Prize Money
$1,260
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Capdeville VS Ciric H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Paul Capdeville | Nikola Ciric |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:1:20 | 2:1:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (59/90) | 57% (55/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 63% (37/59) | 67% (37/55) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (19/31) | 39% (16/41) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (4/11) | 38% (3/8) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (43/96) | 38% (34/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Capdeville VS Ciric H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Paul Capdeville
Player
Nikola Ciric
66%
(
59 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
55 of
96)
3
Aces
15
5
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
61%
(
19 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
34 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
96)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Paul Capdeville | Nikola Ciric |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Paul Capdeville Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
James Duckworth
Player
Paul Capdeville
40%
(
46 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
62 of
102)
15
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
3
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
58%
(
40 of
69)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
37%
(
42 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
102)
115
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Capdeville
Player
Guillermo Nunez
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve %
43%
(
15 of
35)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
15 of
20)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
10%
(
2 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
9 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
80%
(
28 of
35)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adrian Ungur
Player
Paul Capdeville
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve %
71%
(
35 of
49)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
26 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
60
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Paul Capdeville
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Taro Daniel
Player
Paul Capdeville
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve %
47%
(
21 of
45)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
22 of
27)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
80%
(
8 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Paul Capdeville
Player
Luke Saville
61%
(
67 of
109)
1st Serve %
64%
(
98 of
153)
5
Aces
8
8
Double Faults
7
78%
(
52 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
61 of
98)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
30%
(
33 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
62 of
153)
138
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(7) 6-0 11-9 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
David Souto
Player
Paul Capdeville
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Capdeville
Player
Gonzalo Lama
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
8
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
21 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Arguello
Player
Paul Capdeville
38%
(
20 of
52)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
10
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
23 of
32)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guido Andreozzi
Player
Paul Capdeville
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
6
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
9 of
32)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Nikola Ciric Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Nikola Ciric
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
32
|
7-6(1) 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Pietro Rondoni
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
77%
(
48 of
62)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
22%
(
12 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
47
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Enrico Becuzzi
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
20 of
45)
9
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
6%
(
2 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Tudor Sulea
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
31 of
42)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Guillaume Rufin
Player
Nikola Ciric
52%
(
47 of
90)
1st Serve %
63%
(
52 of
82)
2
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
2
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
60%
(
26 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
25 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-1 4-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikola Ciric
Player
Calin Manda
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
59 of
82)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
37 of
59)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 6-2 7-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Capdeville Vs Ciric Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
