Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patrik Nema vs Boy Westerhof Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Nema vs Westerhof analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrik Nema vs Boy Westerhof Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nema has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Westerhof has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nema, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Westerhof has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nema has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Westerhof has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nema has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Westerhof winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nema has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 39/ 27), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Westerhof has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 97/ 52), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nema winning 0 times. They have played 1 sets in total, with Nema winning 1 and Westerhof winning 0. The last match between Nema and Westerhof was at the Germany F15 (Bad Salzdetfurth), 17-10-2017, First, Carpet with Patrik Nema getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:16:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Nema and Westerhof have played a deciding set 0 times, with Nema winning 0 times and Westerhof 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Nema winning 0, and Westerhof 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nema has played against opponents with an average rank of while Westerhof has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nema has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Westerhof has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nema has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Westerhof has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Nema 1 - 0 Westerhof
Ret.
Rank
560
High
26
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
201
High
38
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
56% (100-80)
Career Total W/L
61% (380-246)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$20,450
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patrik Nema | Boy Westerhof |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 0 |
| Games Won | 5 | 1 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:16:0 | 0:16:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (11/14) | 36% (5/14) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 82% (9/11) | 20% (1/5) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 33% (1/3) | 11% (1/9) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 86% (12/14) | 29% (4/14) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5-1 ret. |
Stats 
Patrik Nema
Player
Boy Westerhof
79%
(
11 of
14)
1st Serve %
36%
(
5 of
14)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
82%
(
9 of
11)
1st Serve Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
1 of
3)
2nd Serve Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
86%
(
12 of
14)
22
Total Points Won
6
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patrik Nema | Boy Westerhof |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Patrik Nema Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jonas Trinker
Player
Patrik Nema
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Nema
Player
Chien-Hsun Lo
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
25 of
53)
58
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Patrik Nema
70%
(
57 of
81)
1st Serve %
54%
(
44 of
82)
1
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
9
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
36 of
44)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
82
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrik Nema
Player
Aidan Mchugh
55%
(
28 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
34 of
54)
10
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patrik Nema
Player
Martin Dimitrov
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
19%
(
4 of
21)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Bronka
Player
Patrik Nema
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
25 of
52)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Kacper Zuk
Player
Patrik Nema
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
26%
(
5 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 3-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Boy Westerhof Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Lescure
Player
Boy Westerhof
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
48%
(
21 of
44)
7
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Yannick Vandenbulcke
Player
Boy Westerhof
62%
(
50 of
81)
1st Serve %
47%
(
44 of
93)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
7
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
15 of
49)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
80
|
6-2 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Boy Westerhof
Player
Maxime Mora
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
74)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
22 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marat Deviatiarov
Player
Boy Westerhof
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Boy Westerhof
61%
(
57 of
94)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
96)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
44 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
46 of
57)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
27%
(
25 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
96)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Boy Westerhof
Player
Shahar Elbaz
47%
(
23 of
49)
1st Serve %
77%
(
40 of
52)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Boy Westerhof
Player
Ido Zonder
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
68%
(
13 of
19)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Boy Westerhof
57%
(
41 of
72)
1st Serve %
54%
(
32 of
59)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
10)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
23 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Boy Westerhof
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
7
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
4
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
14 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
92)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Nema Vs Westerhof Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
