Patrik Munkhammar vs Michael Agwi Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 May at 12:37 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Munkhammar vs M. Agwi

SWE
0
Win
Played
1
Win

IRL
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Munkhammar 0 - 1 Agwi
They have played 2 sets in total, with Patrik Munkhammar winning 0 and Michael Agwi winning 2. The last match between Michael Agwi and Patrik Munkhammar was at the M15 Kotka, 22-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Michael Agwi getting the victory 6-2 7-6(4).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Munkhammar | 0 |
| Agwi | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Kotka(05-22-25)
P. Munkhammar vs M. Agwi H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 59.38% (19-13) | Career Total W/L | 68.31% (125-58) |
| 0 | Clay | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 5 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Munkhammar vs M. Agwi Match Preview:
- Agwi has demonstrated superior second serve performance in recent months, winning 45.21% of points compared to Munkhammar's 31.71%. A key indicator for match prediction?
- Munkhammar leads in return game stats, capturing 53.45% of opponents' second serve points versus Agwi's 51.26%. Is this advantage enough to sway the match?
- In terms of first serve returns, Munkhammar again shows an edge with 33.33% versus Agwi's 26.6%.
- When it comes to handling pressure, Agwi has maintained a 55.56% breakpoints save rate, outperforming Munkhammar's 47.83%.
- Over the past year, Agwi holds a higher match win rate at 60.98%, with Munkhammar slightly behind at 55.56%.
- Performance differs by surface; Agwi excels on indoor hard courts (72% win rate), whereas Munkhammar is most successful on clay (67%).
- Both players primarily compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, but Agwi boasts a higher success rate of 65.52% compared to Munkhammar’s 55.56%.
- Agwi's opponents have had an average rank of 461.71, showcasing a disparity in their competitive field, as Munkhammar faces foes with an average rank of 84.
- If the match extends to a deciding set, Agwi has a strong chance of claiming victory, having won 50% in such scenarios, whereas Munkhammar has had no success.
- Munkhammar has an upper hand in breakpoint conversion with 46.15% as opposed to Agwi’s 40.38%, which can prove crucial during critical points in the match.
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
As the match approaches, both players exhibit strengths in different areas. Agwi's superior performance on second serves and better breakpoint saving statistics suggest a resilience under pressure, which could be a decisive factor in tight moments.
However, Munkhammar's proficiency in return games, particularly against the first serve, and higher breakpoint conversion provide a strategic edge during critical phases of the match.
Despite Munkhammar's challenging opponent pool and prowess at converting breakpoints, Agwi’s comprehensive ability to handle pressure and relatively higher win rate over the past year tilt the scales slightly in their favor.
While both players bring competitive assets to the court, Agwi is likely to have the advantage, edging out Munkhammar in this contest.
Patrik Munkhammar vs Michael Agwi Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Munkhammar vs M. Agwi H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 8 | Games Won | 13 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:22:7 | Average Match Time | 1:22:7 |
| 76% (48/63) | 1st Serve % | 58% (26/45) |
| 46% (22/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 77% (20/26) |
| 40% (6/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (7/19) |
| 43% (3/7) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (6/9) |
| 40% (18/45) | Return Points Win % | 56% (35/63) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Munkhammar Recent Matches Played
M. Agwi Recent Matches Played

P. Munkhammar vs M. Agwi Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 59.38% (19/13) | YTD Win/Loss | 68.31% (125/58) |
| 58.90% (43/30) | Sets Win/Loss | 65.14% (271/145) |
| 54.38% (385/323) | Games Win/Loss | 56.09% (2197/1720) |
| 0% (0/0) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (3/3) |
| 62.50% (15/9) | Clay Win/Loss | 69.23% (90/40) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 68.09% (32/15) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.4 |
| 18 | Aces Total | 771 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 59 | Total Double Faults | 579 |
| 1:23:48 | Average Match Time | 1:24:41 |
| 288.31 | Average Opponent Rank | 420.52 |
| 71% (1216/1718) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6290/10070) |
| 60% (728/1216) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (4496/6290) |
| 46% (229/502) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (1807/3780) |
| 52% (116/221) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (501/1122) |
| 48% (831/1743) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4360/10321) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 47.37% (9/10) |
| 59.38% (19/13) | Futures W/L | 71.70% (114/45) |
| 59% (19/32) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 68% (125/183) |
| 36% (4/11) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (27/48) |
| 44% (4/9) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (29/50) |
| 95% (20/19) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (118/110) |
| 5% (20/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (118/8) |
| 0% (12/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 23% (65/15) |