Patrick Zahraj vs Raphael Baltensperger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Zahraj vs Baltensperger analysis and find out who is favored!
Patrick Zahraj vs Raphael Baltensperger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zahraj has won 48.12% of points on his second serve, while Baltensperger has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zahraj, in recent form, has won 52.63% of his opponent's second serve points, while Baltensperger has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 32.48% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zahraj has saved 63.26% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Baltensperger has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zahraj has won 61.9% of matches played (W/L 39/ 24), with Baltensperger winning 60% (W/L 3/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zahraj has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 44/ 31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 18/ 14). Baltensperger has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 23/ 13), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 46/ 48).
- Player level: In the last year, Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.9% of matches (W/L 39/ 23), where as Baltensperger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 3/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Zahraj winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Zahraj winning 2 and Baltensperger winning 0. The last match between Zahraj and Baltensperger was at the M25 Klosters, 20-06-2021, Q1 round, Clay with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:13:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zahraj and Baltensperger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Zahraj winning 0 times and Baltensperger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Zahraj winning 0, and Baltensperger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 122.56 while Baltensperger has played against players with an average rank of 124.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zahraj has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Baltensperger has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zahraj has converted 42.08% of breakpoint opportunities, and Baltensperger has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Zahraj 1 - 0 Baltensperger
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
807
Rank
807
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
900
Rank
676
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
58% (81-59)
Career Total W/L
55% (126-103)
58% (11-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Zahraj VS Baltensperger H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Patrick Zahraj | Raphael Baltensperger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 4 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 1:13:0 | 1:13:0 |
1st Serve % | 65% (32/49) | 62% (33/53) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (25/32) | 52% (17/33) |
2nd Serve Win% | 47% (8/17) | 35% (7/20) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 33% (1/3) |
Return Points W% | 55% (29/53) | 33% (16/49) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Zahraj VS Baltensperger H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-0 6-4 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Patrick Zahraj | Raphael Baltensperger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 58% (11/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 57% (25/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 53% (228/203) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 73% (8/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 38% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.52 | 0 |
Aces Total | 110 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.36 | 0 |
DFs Total | 76 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:50 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 183.84 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 61% (750/1236) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 70% (528/750) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (226/486) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 41% (52/126) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 40% (503/1242) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 58% (11/19) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (9/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Patrick Zahraj Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Patrick Zahraj
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
73)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Arthur Nagel
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
55%
(
58 of
106)
5
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
33%
(
11 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
35 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
99
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Patrick Zahraj
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
67%
(
60 of
90)
26
Aces
11
5
Double Faults
6
84%
(
58 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
45 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
30%
(
32 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
33 of
90)
106
Total Points Won
89
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marcello Serafini
Player
Patrick Zahraj
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
3
Aces
12
3
Double Faults
5
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
32 of
41)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
76
Total Points Won
80
|
2-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Ben Jones
54%
(
30 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
64
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Philip Henning
Player
Patrick Zahraj
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
8
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
19 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Alberto Bronzetti
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
58%
(
57 of
99)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
35 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
SF |
Mees Rottgering
Player
Patrick Zahraj
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
6
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
26 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Amaury Raynel
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
71%
(
50 of
70)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
63
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
David Perez Sanz
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
31 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
94
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Raphael Baltensperger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Edouard Aubert
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
33 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
7
57%
(
24 of
42)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
34 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
55
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Toby Alex Kodat
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
63%
(
65 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
76 of
118)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
10
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
47 of
76)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
52 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
108
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Nicolas Kobelt
58%
(
57 of
99)
1st Serve %
47%
(
39 of
83)
3
Aces
5
12
Double Faults
6
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
14 of
44)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
42 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
41 of
83)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Niklas Koch
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Maurus Malgiaritta
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Patrick Zahraj
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
62
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
QF |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve %
55%
(
43 of
78)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
30 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-4 5-7 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Raphael Baltensperger
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
69%
(
50 of
72)
1st Serve %
50%
(
21 of
42)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Quentin Folliot
Player
Raphael Baltensperger
41%
(
38 of
92)
1st Serve %
55%
(
60 of
109)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
54%
(
29 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
40%
(
37 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
47 of
109)
102
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-4 | H2H |
view more