Patrick Zahraj vs Arthur Nagel Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Zahraj vs A. Nagel

Patrick Zahraj
GER
l
l
w
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
26
Age
22
-
Height
-
267
C. Rank
617
240
Best Rank
610
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$10.6K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Arthur Nagel
FRA
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
w
2
Win
2
Played
0
Win
26
Age
22
-
Height
-
267
C. Rank
617
240
Best Rank
610
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$10.6K
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Zahraj 2 - 0 Nagel
They have played 5 sets in total, with Patrick Zahraj winning 4 and Arthur Nagel winning 1. The last match between Patrick Zahraj and Arthur Nagel was at the M15 Trier, 22-08-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-0.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Zahraj | 2 |
| Nagel | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R2) M15 Trier(08-22-24)
Patrick Zahraj
4
6
6
Arthur Nagel
6
1
0
(R1) M15 Lons-le-Saunier(04-02-24)
Patrick Zahraj
7
7
Arthur Nagel
6
5
P. Zahraj vs A. Nagel H2H Profile
P. Zahraj vs A. Nagel Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Patrick Zahraj has won 40.87% of points on their second serve, while Arthur Nagel has won 44.83%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Patrick Zahraj, in recent form, has won 44.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Arthur Nagel has won 42.55%. The same stats for first serve returns are 25.26% and 27.75% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Patrick Zahraj has saved 56.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Arthur Nagel has saved 51.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Patrick Zahraj has won 51.35% of matches played (W/L 38/36), with Arthur Nagel winning 67.14% (W/L 47/23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Patrick Zahraj has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 62% (W/L 48/30), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 19/17). Arthur Nagel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 11/2), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 25/17).
- Player level: In the last year, Patrick Zahraj has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50.98% of matches (W/L 26/25), where as Arthur Nagel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.65% of matches (W/L 46/22). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Patrick Zahraj winning 2 times and Arthur Nagel being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Patrick Zahraj winning 4 and Arthur Nagel winning 1.
- The last match between Patrick Zahraj and Arthur Nagel was at the M15 Trier, 22-08-2024, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Patrick Zahraj getting the victory 4-6 6-1 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:59:30.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Patrick Zahraj has played against opponents with an average rank of 324.74 while Arthur Nagel has played against players with an average rank of 434.5.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Patrick Zahraj has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Arthur Nagel has won 64% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Patrick Zahraj has converted 34.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Arthur Nagel has converted 34.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Patrick Zahraj vs Arthur Nagel Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Zahraj vs A. Nagel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 18 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 11 |
| 11 | Total Double Faults | 7 |
| 1:59:30 | Average Match Time | 1:59:30 |
| 68% (100/147) | 1st Serve % | 62% (112/181) |
| 75% (75/100) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (63/112) |
| 38% (18/47) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (26/69) |
| 44% (12/27) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (6/13) |
| 51% (92/181) | Return Points Win % | 37% (54/147) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Zahraj 46%, Nagel 52%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Zahraj 51%, Nagel 51%.
Break Points Saved %: Zahraj 60%, Nagel 57%.
P. Zahraj Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(4) 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 6-3 | ||
A. Nagel Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | W | 7-6(8) 7-6(6) | ||
R2 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | ||
F | W | 6-4 7-5 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 3-6 6-2 | ||

P. Zahraj vs A. Nagel Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.97% (150/118) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.87% (99/56) |
| 54.97% (332/272) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.45% (214/140) |
| 52.07% (2996/2758) | Games Win/Loss | 54.55% (1809/1507) |
| 52.78% (19/17) | Hard Win/Loss | 84.62% (11/2) |
| 53.44% (70/61) | Clay Win/Loss | 65.82% (52/27) |
| 60.87% (56/36) | Indoor Hard W/L | 57.14% (36/27) |
| 55.56% (5/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.34 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
| 968 | Aces Total | 447 |
| 0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1016 | Total Double Faults | 313 |
| 1:30:14 | Average Match Time | 1:20:2 |
| 155.75 | Average Opponent Rank | 341.19 |
| 61% (9370/15322) | 1st Serve % | 65% (5691/8732) |
| 69% (6439/9370) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (3799/5691) |
| 45% (2657/5952) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1537/3041) |
| 43% (715/1679) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (376/870) |
| 42% (6492/15615) | Return Points Win % | 40% (3417/8493) |
| 30.00% (3/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.00% (39/36) | Challenger W/L | 50.00% (1/1) |
| 59.02% (108/75) | Futures W/L | 64.05% (98/55) |
| 56% (148/262) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (97/153) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 54% (40/74) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (19/37) |
| 54% (39/72) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (27/45) |
| 86% (148/128) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (98/87) |
| 13% (148/19) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (98/11) |
| 18% (120/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (56/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 04:20 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 08:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 04:05 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 09:00 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
04:10
H2H 1-1
20:00
H2H 0-1
17:00
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
18:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal