Patricia Maria Tig vs Martha Matoula Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jul at 09:29 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Maria Tig vs M. Matoula

ROU
2
Win
Played
0
Win

GRE
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tig 2 - 0 Matoula
They have played 5 sets in total, with Patricia Maria Tig winning 4 and Martha Matoula winning 1. The last match between Patricia Maria Tig and Martha Matoula was at the W35 Buzau, 12-07-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Clay, with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory 6-1 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tig | 2 |
| Matoula | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(SF) W35 Buzau(07-12-25)
(R1) Transylvania Open - Cluj-Napoca(10-16-23)
P. M. Tig vs M. Matoula H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $673,476 | Career Prize Money | $2,930 |
| 63.72% (411-234) | Career Total W/L | 56.34% (200-155) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 23 | Titles | 2 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 33.33% (1-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 33.33% (1-2) |
P. M. Tig vs M. Matoula Match Preview:
- Tig has edged out Matoula slightly in second serve performances, winning 39.57% of points compared to Matoula's 38.39% over the last six months. Does this difference in second serve success indicate a strong advantage? Perhaps slightly, but not definitively decisive.
- On return games, Matoula has outperformed Tig on both first and second serve returns, 36.55% versus 34% on first serves, and 51.02% versus Tig's 50.41% on second serves. Could this be the key to Matoula's potential victory?
- Tig has demonstrated better poise under pressure, saving 50.57% of breakpoints, while Matoula's success rate is 47.75% in similar situations. Will Tig’s resilience in saving breakpoints give her the upper hand in tight moments?
- Overall, Tig boasts a superior match win rate over the past year at 70.11%, outshining Matoula's 58.44%. Historically, Tig comes out on top—how might this affect their head-to-head dynamic?
- Their preferred surface of play is clay, where Tig and Matoula have their highest career win percentages at 69% and 60%, respectively. Neither player excels on indoor hard courts, their current battleground, which could neutralize specific advantages.
- When levelling the tournament stages, Tig secures a stronger win rate at the Challenger/ITF tournaments above $10K compared to Matoula, standing at 66.1% to 57.58%.
- In once meeting head-to-head, Tig emerged victorious, adding a psychological edge perhaps, since Tig sealed the win in a three-set match.
- Matoula manages a stronger deciding set success rate, winning 62% of such sets compared to Tig’s 50%, suggesting an edge if the match extends to a decider.
- While both players have different strengths, such as Matoula's breakpoint conversion at 45.08% over Tig’s 41.1%, their past performance in head-to-head matches and Tig’s experience against higher-ranked players could tip the scales.
- Both athletes have yet to demonstrate a distinct advantage in tiebreaker scenarios, where Matoula has narrowly edged Tig.
Editorial Prediction (July 11, 2025, UTC):
Patricia Maria Tig and Sophia Matoula show contrasting abilities, with slight variances in performance patterns that might influence the match. Tig's history of marginally superior performance and recent head-to-head win gives her a slim advantage entering this encounter.
While Matoula typically performs robustly against a slightly lesser-ranked opposition and displays a higher breakpoint conversion rate, Tig's poise under pressure and better overall winning rate could be pivotal.
However, the match is likely to be competitive, with intricate exchanges anticipated considering their comparable ability on hard courts. If the clash extends to a deciding set, Matoula's higher success rate in such scenarios needs careful consideration.
Having evaluated the statistics and trends, Patricia Maria Tig is slightly more favorable to clinch this competitive match, albeit by a narrow margin.
Patricia Maria Tig vs Martha Matoula Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. M. Tig vs M. Matoula H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 30 | Games Won | 19 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 18 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 2:36:44 | Average Match Time | 2:36:44 |
| 61% (106/174) | 1st Serve % | 61% (108/176) |
| 62% (66/106) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (54/108) |
| 40% (27/68) | 2nd Serve Win % | 37% (25/68) |
| 53% (17/32) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (10/20) |
| 55% (97/176) | Return Points Win % | 47% (81/174) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. M. Tig Recent Matches Played
M. Matoula Recent Matches Played

P. M. Tig vs M. Matoula Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.78% (412/234) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.34% (200/155) |
| 62.52% (909/545) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.69% (443/367) |
| 55.72% (7291/5794) | Games Win/Loss | 52.46% (3846/3485) |
| 57.23% (99/74) | Hard Win/Loss | 53.76% (50/43) |
| 69.00% (276/124) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.41% (142/97) |
| 55.56% (35/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 34.78% (8/15) |
| 20.00% (2/8) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 648 | Aces Total | 234 |
| 0.3 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 1940 | Total Double Faults | 932 |
| 1:1:59 | Average Match Time | 1:17:15 |
| 503.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.28 |
| 60% (15126/25306) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10802/17695) |
| 63% (9584/15126) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (6321/10802) |
| 45% (4624/10180) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (3040/6893) |
| 48% (1607/3322) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (1199/2390) |
| 47% (11690/24894) | Return Points Win % | 48% (8566/17763) |
| 24.24% (8/25) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.17% (16/13) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 49.52% (52/53) | Main Tour W/L | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 60.27% (135/89) | Challenger W/L | 52.83% (112/100) |
| 78.74% (200/54) | Futures W/L | 62.50% (85/51) |
| 65% (405/627) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (196/349) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 59% (74/126) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (27/51) |
| 50% (88/176) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (57/102) |
| 88% (426/375) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 88% (187/164) |
| 12% (426/51) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 12% (187/23) |
| 17% (218/37) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (168/36) |