Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Patricia Maria Tig vs Anhelina Kalinina Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Tig vs Kalinina analysis and find out who is favored!
Patricia Maria Tig vs Anhelina Kalinina Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Tig has won 39.2% of points on his second serve, while Kalinina has won 44.8%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Tig, in recent form, has won 49.57% of his opponent's second serve points, while Kalinina has won 55.35%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.83% and 39.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Tig has saved 44.07% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kalinina has saved 49.1% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Tig has won 37.04% of matches played (W/L 10/ 17), with Kalinina winning 52.73% (W/L 29/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Tig has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 200/ 100), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 13% (W/L 1/ 7). Kalinina has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 173/ 70), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 13/ 15).
- Player level: In the last year, Tig has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 26.67% of matches (W/L 4/ 11), where as Kalinina has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 53.85% of matches (W/L 14/ 12). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Tig winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Tig winning 2 and Kalinina winning 0. The last match between Tig and Kalinina was at the Baltic Open - Jurmala, 24-07-2019, Second, Clay with Patricia Maria Tig getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:18:22.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Tig and Kalinina have played a deciding set 0 times, with Tig winning 0 times and Kalinina 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Tig winning 0, and Kalinina 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Tig has played against opponents with an average rank of 243.22 while Kalinina has played against players with an average rank of 99.22.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Tig has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kalinina has won 73% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Tig has converted 48.57% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kalinina has converted 41.95% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Tig 1 - 0 Kalinina
474
Rank
56
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
32
Rank
25
High
27
Age
R
Plays
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
62% (323-199)
Career Total W/L
64% (366-203)
25% (1-3)
YTD W/L
50% (10-10)
$584,816
Career Prize Money
$1,969,242
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Anhelina Kalinina |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:22 | 1:18:22 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (52/66) | 75% (36/48) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (35/52) | 50% (18/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 21% (3/14) | 67% (8/12) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (5/5) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (22/48) | 42% (28/66) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
75%
(
36 of
48)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
21%
(
3 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
8 of
12)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
28 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
22 of
48)
60
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Patricia Maria Tig | Anhelina Kalinina |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 25% (1/3) | 50% (10/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 47% (20/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 37% (21/36) | 48% (191/203) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 75% (3/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.04 | 0.14 |
| Aces Total | 1 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 1.07 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 48 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:45 | 1:39:40 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 303.25 | 75.35 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (101/193) | 66% (815/1228) |
| 1st Serve W% | 55% (56/101) | 58% (476/815) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 38% (35/92) | 44% (182/413) |
| BPs Won% Total | 60% (9/15) | 41% (77/190) |
| Return Pts W% | 43% (80/185) | 45% (613/1355) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 43% (3/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 33% (1/3) | 50% (10/20) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (3/3) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (8/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (8/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 17% (12/2) |
Patricia Maria Tig Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ayla Aksu
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
9 of
15)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
44%
(
4 of
9)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
17%
(
1 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
67%
(
10 of
15)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
19
Total Points Won
16
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Chiara Fornasieri
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
0
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Laura Hietaranta
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
23 of
34)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Martina Colmegna
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
79%
(
48 of
61)
1st Serve %
50%
(
26 of
52)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
10
60%
(
29 of
48)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
33 of
52)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anastasija Sevastova
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
67%
(
22 of
33)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
23 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francesca Curmi
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
78%
(
62 of
80)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
6
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
42 of
86)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
5-7 6-0 2-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nuria Parrizas-Diaz
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
56%
(
35 of
62)
1st Serve %
63%
(
46 of
73)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
39 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
56
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ekaterina Makarova (1996)
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
73%
(
69 of
94)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
0
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
2
61%
(
42 of
69)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
45%
(
42 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
81)
92
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Patricia Maria Tig
Player
Martha Matoula
61%
(
70 of
115)
1st Serve %
61%
(
70 of
114)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
11
66%
(
46 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
33%
(
15 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
54 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
58 of
114)
119
Total Points Won
110
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Margaux Rouvroy
Player
Patricia Maria Tig
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
33 of
58)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
43 of
95)
94
Total Points Won
72
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Anhelina Kalinina Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Martina Trevisan
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
39 of
54)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
43%
(
24 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Alize Cornet
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
10
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
33%
(
7 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
16 of
47)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
54%
(
34 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
55 of
98)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Daria Kasatkina
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
47%
(
15 of
32)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
40)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
82%
(
9 of
11)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
29 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
68%
(
41 of
60)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Caroline Wozniacki
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
67%
(
43 of
64)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R4 |
Stats
Yulia Putintseva
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve %
75%
(
61 of
81)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Aryna Sabalenka
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
66%
(
50 of
76)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
48%
(
39 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
76)
80
Total Points Won
78
|
6-4 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Caroline Wozniacki
69%
(
83 of
120)
1st Serve %
63%
(
82 of
130)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
57%
(
47 of
83)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
45 of
82)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
29%
(
6 of
21)
Break Points Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
43%
(
51 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
61 of
130)
130
Total Points Won
120
|
5-7 7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucia Bronzetti
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
15 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Xiyu Wang
Player
Anhelina Kalinina
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
8
Aces
0
9
Double Faults
4
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
23 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Anhelina Kalinina
Player
Diane Parry
69%
(
52 of
75)
1st Serve %
54%
(
48 of
89)
3
Aces
9
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
44%
(
33 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
41 of
89)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tig Vs Kalinina Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Anhelina Kalinina
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
