Prediction of Pamela Southcombe vs Madie Moss Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

HEAD TO HEAD

P. Southcombe vs M. Moss

Pamela Southcombe
Pamela Southcombe

Flag AUS AUS

l
w
w
l
w
l
l
l
l
w
Madie Moss
Madie Moss

Flag AUS AUS

w
l
w
l
l
l
w
l
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

0
Age
0
-
Height
-
Ret.
C. Rank
Ret.
0
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Southcombe 1 - 0 Moss

They have played 2 sets in total, with Pamela Southcombe winning 2 and Madie Moss winning 0. The last match between Pamela Southcombe and Madie Moss was at the Melbourne, 27-11-1952, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Pamela Southcombe getting the victory 6-2 9-7.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Southcombe1
Moss0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R4Melbourne(11-27-52)

Grass
AUS Flag
Pamela Southcombe
6
9
AUS Flag
Madie Moss
2
7

P. Southcombe vs M. Moss H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
44.62% (29-36)Career Total W/L37.78% (17-28)
1Grass0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

P. Southcombe vs M. Moss Match Preview:

  • Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Pamela Southcombe has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Madie Moss has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
  • Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Pamela Southcombe, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Madie Moss has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
  • Under pressure analysis: Pamela Southcombe has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Madie Moss has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
  • Performance overview: Over the last year Pamela Southcombe has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Madie Moss winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
  • Best surface: Pamela Southcombe has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 7/8), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 25% (W/L 1/3). Madie Moss has their best career surface win % on N/A, winning 47% (W/L 4/3), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 26% (W/L 6/17).
  • Player level: In the last year, Pamela Southcombe has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Madie Moss has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
  • Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Pamela Southcombe winning 1 times and Madie Moss being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Pamela Southcombe winning 2 and Madie Moss winning 0.
  • The last match between Pamela Southcombe and Madie Moss was at the Melbourne, 27-11-1952, Round: R4, Surface: Grass, with Pamela Southcombe getting the victory 6-2 9-7.
  • Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
  • Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Pamela Southcombe has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Madie Moss has played against players with an average rank of 0.
  • Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Pamela Southcombe has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Madie Moss has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
  • Break point conversion: In recent form, Pamela Southcombe has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Madie Moss has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Pamela Southcombe vs Madie Moss Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

P. Southcombe vs M. Moss H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
15Games Won9
0:0:0Average Match Time0:0:0
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Southcombe 0%, Moss 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Southcombe 0%, Moss 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Southcombe 0%, Moss 0%.

P. Southcombe Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassAdelaide - 29-11-1976

R3

AUSJ. Peters
W
6-0 6-3

R4

AUSL. Harrison
L
6-3 6-2
ClayAdelaide Hard - 09-10-1976

AUSJ. Lehane
L
6-0 6-0
GrassAdelaide - 08-12-1966

R3

AUSR. Harris
L
8-6 7-5
GrassMelbourne - 26-11-1965

R3

AUSM. Kynaston
W
9-7 6-0

M. Moss Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
GrassSydney - 08-11-1953

R4

AUSB. Penrose
L
7-5 6-2

R3

AUSD. Hardingham
W
6-3 3-6 7-5
GrassMelbourne - 27-11-1952

R3

AUSJ. Donoghue
W
6-2 6-1

R4

AUSP. Southcombe
L
6-2 9-7
ClayChiswick - 09-05-1949

R3

GBRL. Brighton
L
6-8 4-1 ret
banner

P. Southcombe vs M. Moss Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
44.62% (29/36)YTD Win/Loss37.78% (17/28)
42.31% (55/75)Sets Win/Loss40.43% (38/56)
45.88% (562/663)Games Win/Loss46.72% (399/455)
46.67% (7/8)Clay Win/Loss46.15% (6/7)
0% (0/0)Indoor Hard W/L50.00% (1/1)
45.65% (21/25)Grass Win/Loss26.09% (6/17)
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
44.44% (4/5)Slam W/L28.57% (2/5)
41% (24/59)Best of 3 Sets Win %38% (16/42)
42% (5/12)Deciding Set Win %33% (3/9)
81% (26/21)1st Set Won, Won Match80% (20/16)
19% (26/5)1st Set Won, Lost Match15% (20/3)
9% (33/3)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (23/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

01:45 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
ECUA. Andrade9
ROUS. Gima
W1
1.165
W2
4.4
02:00 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
AUSJ. McCabe5
INDK. Singh
W1
1.25
W2
3.48
03:15 AM 19/11/25
Prediction
ECUE. CamachoWC
ECUA. G. Meza4
W1
8.6
W2
1.029
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ITAS. NapolitanoPR
FINO. Virtanen3
W1
3.84
W2
1.21
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
KAZB. Zhukayev
SRBM. Topo
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
12:00 PM 19/11/25
Prediction
ESTD. Glinka
GERT. Gentzsch
W1
1.58
W2
2.2