Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Terence Atmane Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Jul at 03:54 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Llamas Ruiz vs T. Atmane

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ruiz 1 - 0 Atmane
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pablo Llamas Ruiz winning 2 and Terence Atmane winning 0. The last match between Pablo Llamas Ruiz and Terence Atmane was at the Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag, 22-07-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Pablo Llamas Ruiz getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ruiz | 1 |
| Atmane | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Plava Laguna Croatia Open - Umag(07-22-25)
P. L. Ruiz vs T. Atmane H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $321,140 | Career Prize Money | $765,265 |
| 60.54% (178-116) | Career Total W/L | 60.56% (238-155) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 40.00% (2-3) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.18% (7-10) |
P. L. Ruiz vs T. Atmane Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Recently, Ruiz has achieved a 46.04% win rate on second serve points, slightly lower than Atmane's 47.07%. Does this small difference affect match predictions? It often does as it’s closely tied to match outcomes.
- Return Game Analysis: Ruiz excels in returning, winning 45.99% of opponents' second serve points compared to Atmane's 44.79%. Additionally, Ruiz significantly outperforms Atmane in first serve returns, capturing 33.42% versus 24%. How does this influence the match prediction? It can give Ruiz an edge.
- Under Pressure: Atmane has a superior breakpoint-saving capability, checking in at 63.61%, higher than Ruiz's 50%. Could this skill be a game-changer? Saving breakpoints often shifts match momentum.
- Overall Performance: Over a year, Atmane has a slight edge in match wins with a 54.29% win rate, while Ruiz stands at 51.85%. What does this suggest? Atmane might have a slight edge in overall performance.
- Preferred Surface: Ruiz's best win rate is on clay (64%), whereas Atmane favors hard courts with a 65% win rate. How does surface preference impact their play? It could dictate match strategy.
- Competition Level: Atmane has a better record at higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments, winning 58.7% of matches, whereas Ruiz only wins 41.67% at this level. How might this affect their head-to-head performance? It suggests Atmane might prevail in tougher competitions.
- Quality of Opponents: Atmane has faced slightly higher-ranked opponents, with an average ranking of 241.59, compared to Ruiz's opponents at 259.26. Can this be an advantage? Playing tougher opponents often improves player resilience and skill.
- Deciding Set Capabilities: Ruiz has a slight edge in winning deciding sets, boasting a 50% win rate compared to Atmane's 47%. Will this play a role if the match is tight? Potentially, in closely contested matches, this could make a difference.
- Breakpoint Conversion: Ruiz's breakpoint conversion recently stands at 31.33%, higher than Atmane's 29.65%. Does this highlight a critical strength? Efficient breakpoint conversion often leads to match-winning opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (July 22, 2025, UTC):
As these two players prepare to face each other, their stats reveal a close contest ahead. Ruiz enjoys a slight edge in return games and breakpoint conversion, both crucial to gaining the upper hand during critical moments in a match.
Atmane stands out under pressure, excelling in saving breakpoints, which could be pivotal if Ruiz’s returns are aggressive. Furthermore, Atmane’s experience against higher-ranked players and superior performance on more challenging circuits suggest enhanced resilience.
Considering both recent performance metrics and surface adaptability, Atmane may start as a favorite. However, given Ruiz's slight advantages in return statistics and deciding set scenarios, the match could swing either way under certain conditions. Ultimately, slight statistical and psychological advantages lean towards a narrow victory for Atmane in this matchup.
Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Terence Atmane Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. L. Ruiz vs T. Atmane H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:17:47 | Average Match Time | 1:17:47 |
| 63% (31/49) | 1st Serve % | 52% (30/58) |
| 68% (21/31) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (19/30) |
| 67% (12/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 25% (7/28) |
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (2/4) |
| 55% (32/58) | Return Points Win % | 33% (16/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. L. Ruiz Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-3 3-6 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-4 | ||
QF | L | 6-3 6-4 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 3-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 7-6(5) | ||
T. Atmane Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 2-6 6-4 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 4-4 ret. | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 5-7 6-0 | ||

P. L. Ruiz vs T. Atmane Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.54% (178/116) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.56% (238/155) |
| 58.99% (397/276) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.61% (541/382) |
| 53.50% (3391/2947) | Games Win/Loss | 52.64% (4755/4278) |
| 48.08% (25/27) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.16% (187/100) |
| 64.76% (147/80) | Clay Win/Loss | 55.07% (38/31) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Indoor Hard W/L | 36.00% (9/16) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 33.33% (4/8) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.52 |
| 510 | Aces Total | 2288 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.3 |
| 374 | Total Double Faults | 1332 |
| 1:35:55 | Average Match Time | 1:40:25 |
| 374.09 | Average Opponent Rank | 381.04 |
| 68% (13109/19241) | 1st Serve % | 59% (16558/27841) |
| 65% (8461/13109) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (11940/16558) |
| 51% (3104/6132) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (5866/11283) |
| 45% (969/2145) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (1012/2386) |
| 42% (8111/19152) | Return Points Win % | 38% (10330/27294) |
| 53.33% (8/7) | Slam W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 66.67% (2/1) | Masters W/L | 57.58% (19/14) |
| 64.00% (16/9) | Main Tour W/L | 42.86% (15/20) |
| 59.29% (67/46) | Challenger W/L | 62.16% (92/56) |
| 61.59% (85/53) | Futures W/L | 65.43% (106/56) |
| 62% (175/284) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (234/383) |
| 25% (1/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 51% (43/85) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (91/155) |
| 51% (44/86) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (74/140) |
| 88% (177/156) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (243/209) |
| 12% (177/21) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (243/34) |
| 18% (117/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (148/29) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kathinka Von Deichmann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Eva Vedder vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 19th November 2025 Best Bets

Shintaro Mochizuki vs Federico Arnaboldi Prediction – ATP Bergamo Challenger – 18th November 2025 Best Bets

Simona Waltert vs Solana Sierra Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 16th November 2025 Best Bets

Linda Noskova vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 16th November 2025 Best Bets
