Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Ruiz vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Pablo Llamas Ruiz vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Ruiz has won 48.42% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 48.43%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Ruiz, in recent form, has won 48.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 53.93%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.59% and 34.9% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Ruiz has saved 58.82% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 57.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Ruiz has won 60% of matches played (W/L 42/ 28), with Michalski winning 61.54% (W/L 40/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Ruiz has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 65% (W/L 117/ 62), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Michalski has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 174/ 90), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 5/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Ruiz has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.26% of matches (W/L 33/ 20), where as Michalski has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 42.42% of matches (W/L 14/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Ruiz winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Ruiz winning 2 and Michalski winning 0. The last match between Ruiz and Michalski was at the Maspalomas Challenger, 29-11-2022, First, Clay with Pablo Llamas Ruiz getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:10:56.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Ruiz and Michalski have played a deciding set 0 times, with Ruiz winning 0 times and Michalski 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Ruiz winning 0, and Michalski 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Ruiz has played against opponents with an average rank of 288.21 while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of 259.77.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Ruiz has won 33% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Ruiz has converted 40.38% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 40.39% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Ruiz 1 - 0 Michalski
4
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
152
Rank
131
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
302
Rank
243
High
24
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
Form
61% (142-90)
Career Total W/L
62% (207-126)
45% (9-11)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$109,580
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Pablo Llamas Ruiz | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 5 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:10:56 | 1:10:56 |
1st Serve % | 69% (33/48) | 76% (38/50) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 58% (22/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 87% (13/15) | 58% (7/12) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/2) |
Return Points W% | 42% (21/50) | 21% (10/48) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-4 |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Daniel Michalski
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
76%
(
38 of
50)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
87%
(
13 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Pablo Llamas Ruiz | Daniel Michalski |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 45% (9/11) | 44% (7/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 51% (24/23) | 43% (15/20) |
Games Win/Loss | 49% (233/241) | 47% (159/181) |
Hard Win/Loss | 29% (2/5) | 14% (1/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (4/3) | 67% (2/1) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.11 |
Aces Total | 68 | 19 |
DFs per game | 0.05 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 12 | 31 |
Avg Match Time | 1:51:56 | 1:48:46 |
Avg Opp Rank | 308.55 | 354.69 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1056/1536) | 64% (738/1155) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (719/1056) | 63% (463/738) |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (237/480) | 48% (201/417) |
BPs Won% Total | 42% (50/120) | 42% (41/98) |
Return Pts W% | 36% (545/1509) | 38% (417/1090) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 42% (5/7) | 44% (7/9) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 45% (9/20) | 44% (7/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 57% (4/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 14% (1/7) | 67% (2/3) |
1st set W, W | 82% (11/9) | 88% (8/7) |
1st set W, L | 18% (11/2) | 13% (8/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (8/0) |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
85)
1
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
0
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
39 of
55)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
5 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
41%
(
42 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
101
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Henrique Rocha
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
69%
(
56 of
81)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
38 of
56)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
81)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Richard Gasquet
63%
(
58 of
92)
1st Serve %
61%
(
69 of
113)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
49 of
69)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
16 of
44)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
48 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
97
|
6-2 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Ivan Gakhov
79%
(
45 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
32 of
53)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Jan Choinski
75%
(
77 of
102)
1st Serve %
72%
(
71 of
98)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
52 of
77)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
46 of
71)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
102
Total Points Won
98
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Landaluce
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
27 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
18 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
18 of
49)
55
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(6) 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
64%
(
66 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
71 of
108)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
40 of
71)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
40%
(
41 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
51 of
108)
113
Total Points Won
98
|
7-5 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maxime Cressy
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
67%
(
81 of
121)
17
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
55 of
81)
70%
(
28 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
22%
(
2 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
18 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
45 of
121)
114
Total Points Won
94
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
Player
Guy Den Ouden
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
31 of
48)
47%
(
7 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
18 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
36 of
80)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dominic Thiem
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
35%
(
27 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Jonas Forejtek
54%
(
66 of
122)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
2
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
1
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
63%
(
35 of
56)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
25 of
49)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
123
|
7-5 6-7(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Evan Furness
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
64%
(
74 of
115)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
75%
(
59 of
79)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
45 of
74)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
37%
(
42 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
51 of
115)
122
Total Points Won
106
|
6-1 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Daniel Michalski
70%
(
45 of
64)
1st Serve %
71%
(
54 of
76)
6
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Martin Damm
Player
Daniel Michalski
51%
(
49 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
55%
(
26 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
19%
(
3 of
16)
39%
(
37 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
QF |
David Jorda Sanchis
Player
Daniel Michalski
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
60%
(
24 of
40)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
56
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Sergi Perez Contri
62%
(
38 of
61)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
7
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
25 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H |
view more