Pablo Carreno-Busta vs Alejandro Tabilo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Oct at 12:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Carreno-Busta vs A. Tabilo

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CHI
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Carreno-Busta 1 - 0 Tabilo
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Carreno-Busta | 1 |
| Tabilo | 0 |
Last 0 H2H Matches:
No past h2h happened.
P. Carreno-Busta vs A. Tabilo H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $10,687,070 | Career Prize Money | $2,504,375 |
| 63.34% (610-353) | Career Total W/L | 59.42% (388-265) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 33 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 38.10% (8-13) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.38% (12-17) |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 1 |
P. Carreno-Busta vs A. Tabilo Match Preview:
- In the last six months, Alejandro Tabilo has secured 49.18% of points on his second serve, surpassing Pablo Carreno-Busta, who has managed 44.84%. Could this second serve performance give Alejandro an edge?
- When it comes to return stats, Tabilo has claimed 44.57% of points on his opponent's second serve recently, slightly behind Carreno-Busta at 45.27%. For first serve returns, Tabilo trails with 25.13% compared to Carreno-Busta’s 26.51%. Does this indicate a stronger return game for Carreno-Busta?
- Under pressure, Tabilo has saved 54.85% of breakpoints, narrowly less effective than Carreno-Busta's 55.76%. Could this make a crucial difference in tight moments?
- Looking at their performance over the past year, Tabilo has won 56.00% of his matches, while Carreno-Busta has a slightly higher rate at 59.09%. What does this suggest about overall match-winning ability?
- Both players share their best surface performance on Clay with a 61% win rate, yet Tabilo has a better record on I.hard (55%) compared to Carreno-Busta’s weakness on Grass (30%). Will the surface play a defining role?
- Analyzing player levels, Tabilo has competed mainly on the Main tour, winning 47.37% of his matches. Carreno-Busta has a superior 75% win rate in Challenger-level events. How might their experience levels affect the outcome?
- In their direct head-to-head, Carreno-Busta leads, having won their only match played, indicating an advantage in personal encounters.
- Tabilo has played higher-ranked opponents recently (average rank 148.18) than Carreno-Busta (average rank 191.88). Could this tougher competition have better prepared Tabilo?
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Tabilo has a higher success rate at 55%, compared to Carreno-Busta’s 45%. Might this resilience be pivotal?
Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):
Alejandro Tabilo's stronger recent second serve performance provides a potential advantage over Pablo Carreno-Busta, as successful second serves are crucial for match predictions. However, Pablo's slight edge in first and second serve return points shows his tenacity in breaking down his opponent's games.
Examining pressure scenarios, Carreno-Busta excels marginally in saving breakpoints, which could prove decisive in clutch moments. Despite both players' proficiency on clay, the difference could lie in their recent match history. Carreno-Busta's victory in their only head-to-head further tilts the balance in his favor.
While Tabilo's experience against stronger opponents may boost his confidence, Carreno-Busta's consistent form at the Challenger level suggests superior match sharpness. The deciding factor would likely come from the players’ pressure-handling capabilities and their ability to capitalize on pivotal game points.
Based on these insights, Pablo Carreno-Busta emerges as the slight favorite to win this upcoming match, leveraging his return game advantages and past head-to-head victory.
Pablo Carreno-Busta vs Alejandro Tabilo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
Recent Performance Stats
P. Carreno-Busta Recent Matches Played
A. Tabilo Recent Matches Played

P. Carreno-Busta vs A. Tabilo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.34% (610/353) | YTD Win/Loss | 59.42% (388/265) |
| 60.20% (1431/946) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.96% (868/656) |
| 53.51% (12137/10545) | Games Win/Loss | 52.72% (7597/6812) |
| 65.35% (198/105) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.41% (120/82) |
| 65.62% (355/186) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.89% (218/140) |
| 51.52% (51/48) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.52% (38/33) |
| 30.00% (6/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 54.55% (12/10) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.38 |
| 2864 | Aces Total | 2670 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
| 1384 | Total Double Faults | 1940 |
| 1:21:30 | Average Match Time | 1:25:45 |
| 111.42 | Average Opponent Rank | 390.76 |
| 64% (35944/56288) | 1st Serve % | 62% (24949/40233) |
| 70% (25056/35944) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (17675/24949) |
| 52% (10546/20339) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7372/15284) |
| 42% (2307/5554) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1645/3828) |
| 39% (22215/56929) | Return Points Win % | 40% (15656/39603) |
| 59.41% (60/41) | Slam W/L | 48.65% (18/19) |
| 52.59% (71/64) | Masters W/L | 61.22% (30/19) |
| 55.00% (11/9) | Cups W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 56.38% (168/130) | Main Tour W/L | 53.54% (53/46) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 70.56% (151/63) | Challenger W/L | 63.77% (132/75) |
| 77.01% (144/43) | Futures W/L | 60.82% (149/96) |
| 64% (541/847) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 60% (374/628) |
| 59% (61/104) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 42% (8/19) |
| 56% (207/367) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (104/202) |
| 55% (170/308) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (107/196) |
| 86% (595/514) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (383/329) |
| 13% (595/79) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (383/54) |
| 26% (366/94) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (269/56) |