Pablo Aunion vs Ryan Nijboer Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 23 Oct at 03:41 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
P. Aunion vs R. Nijboer

ESP
0
Win
Played
1
Win

NED
0
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Aunion 0 - 1 Nijboer
They have played 2 sets in total, with Pablo Aunion winning 0 and Ryan Nijboer winning 2. The last match between Ryan Nijboer and Pablo Aunion was at the M25 Sintra, 23-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ryan Nijboer getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Aunion | 0 |
| Nijboer | 1 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sintra(10-23-25)
P. Aunion vs R. Nijboer H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $5,735 |
| 53.06% (26-23) | Career Total W/L | 56.68% (297-227) |
| 0 | Hard | 1 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 0 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
P. Aunion vs R. Nijboer Match Preview:
- Which player has the stronger second serve performance recently? Pablo Aunion leads with 45.99% of points won on their second serve compared to Ryan Nijboer's 39.02%.
- Looking at second serve returns, Pablo Aunion also holds an edge with 49.23% of opponents' points won, more than Ryan Nijboer's 46.80%.
- Who seems more resilient under pressure? Pablo Aunion saves 61.11% of breakpoints, outpacing Ryan Nijboer's 52.35%.
- In terms of overall win rate over the past year, Pablo Aunion's record is 61.76% while Ryan Nijboer's is 54.22%.
- Analyzing surface strengths, Pablo Aunion performs best on Clay with a 58% win rate, whereas Ryan Nijboer excels on Hard courts with a 58% win rate.
- Competitive level assessment shows both players frequently compete in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K tournaments where Pablo Aunion has a 61.76% win rate, slightly lower than Ryan Nijboer's 64.44%.
- Considering opponent quality, Pablo Aunion faces opponents with an average rank of 65.09, indicating tougher competition compared to Ryan Nijboer's average of 460.87.
- In deciding sets over the past year, Pablo Aunion has prevailed in 55% of matches, in contrast to Ryan Nijboer's 36% success rate.
Editorial Prediction (October 23, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent performances and key statistics, Pablo Aunion appears to have a competitive edge over Ryan Nijboer in several critical areas.
Pablo Aunion demonstrates stronger second serve capabilities and superior breakpoint resilience. In competitive matches, especially against higher-ranking opponents, Aunion shows consistently better form.
Additionally, his ability to prevail in deciding sets adds to his advantage, particularly if the match extends to a closely contested affair.
Given these factors and their relative performances on preferred surfaces, Pablo Aunion is likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming match.
Pablo Aunion vs Ryan Nijboer Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
P. Aunion vs R. Nijboer H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 0 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 0 | Sets Won | 2 |
| 7 | Games Won | 13 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:38:16 | Average Match Time | 1:38:16 |
| 57% (40/70) | 1st Serve % | 64% (37/58) |
| 57% (23/40) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (24/37) |
| 40% (12/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 62% (13/21) |
| 25% (2/8) | Break Pts Won % | 42% (5/12) |
| 36% (21/58) | Return Points Win % | 50% (35/70) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
P. Aunion Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-4 5-7 10-3 | ||
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
Q3 | W | 2-6 6-4 10-8 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-1 6-4 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-7(2) 6-3 10-6 | ||
R. Nijboer Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 7-6(2) | ||
QF | L | 7-5 3-6 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-2 | ||

P. Aunion vs R. Nijboer Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.06% (26/23) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.68% (297/227) |
| 51.35% (57/54) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.21% (683/532) |
| 50.94% (569/548) | Games Win/Loss | 52.82% (5964/5328) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Hard Win/Loss | 59.30% (102/70) |
| 58.06% (18/13) | Clay Win/Loss | 57.72% (187/137) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 28.57% (8/20) |
| 0.08 | Aces Per Game | 0.22 |
| 43 | Aces Total | 1212 |
| 0.11 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.33 |
| 61 | Total Double Faults | 1838 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:34:44 |
| 64.06 | Average Opponent Rank | 480.64 |
| 57% (491/868) | 1st Serve % | 63% (19950/31665) |
| 67% (327/491) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (13358/19950) |
| 42% (158/377) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (5367/11715) |
| 41% (28/69) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (1609/3549) |
| 37% (291/784) | Return Points Win % | 42% (13620/32049) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 42.22% (38/52) |
| 55.32% (26/21) | Futures W/L | 60.14% (258/171) |
| 49% (22/45) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (290/512) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (2/6) |
| 13% (1/8) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 47% (66/139) |
| 47% (8/17) | Deciding Set Win % | 46% (77/167) |
| 91% (22/20) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (312/260) |
| 9% (22/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (312/52) |
| 19% (27/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 17% (212/37) |