Oliver Crawford vs Masamichi Imamura Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Is there a significant difference in second serve performance recently? Crawford slightly edges Imamura with 46.16% compared to 45.65% in converting second serve points.
• Both players win similar percentage of return points on their opponents' second serves, with Crawford slightly higher at 44.71% over Imamura's 44.47%.
• For first serve returns, Imamura leads with a 29.52% win rate, while Crawford has 27.43%.
• Who handles pressure better? Crawford saves more breakpoints at 54.18%, slightly better than Imamura’s 51.28%.
• Looking at last year’s overall match win rates, Crawford is more dominant, winning 72.5% of matches, whereas Imamura has a 50% win rate.
• Imamura performs best on indoor hard courts with a 67% win rate, while Crawford excels on hard courts with a 71% success rate.
• In terms of competition level, Crawford has played and won consistently at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level with a 79.25% win rate, compared to Imamura's 40.54% at Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K.
• Imamura has been competing against slightly higher-ranked players on average at 345.18 compared to Crawford's 421.04 ranked opponents.
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Crawford has shown greater resilience with a 71% win rate compared to Imamura's 57%.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion, Imamura is slightly better, converting 37.25% of opportunities versus Crawford's 36.07%.

Editorial Prediction (August 25, 2025, UTC):

The upcoming tennis match between Imamura and Crawford highlights a fascinating contrast in strengths and recent performances.

Crawford demonstrates superior overall match-winning consistency, particularly on hard courts and in deciding set scenarios. This consistency is further supported by their ability to handle pressure effectively, as seen in their higher breakpoint save percentage.

Imamura, however, shows a slight edge in breakpoint conversion and first serve return successes. Despite this, Crawford’s performance history and competitive edge in tournament settings could prove decisive.

Taking all considered factors into account, Crawford appears to have the upper hand and is likely to emerge as the winner in this contest.