Olga Danilovic vs Dayana Yastremska Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In the recent six months, Yastremska shows a slight edge in second serve points, winning 40.21% compared to Danilovic's 39.4%. Could this minor superiority in serving indicate Yastremska’s potential advantage?
• When examining return games, Yastremska has a small lead, winning 48.54% of points on opponents' second serves against Danilovic’s 47.05%.
• For first serve return points, the difference is minimal, with Yastremska at 31.12% and Danilovic at 30.78%—a statistic closely tied to predicting match favorites.
• Breaking points: Yastremska saves them better, showing a 54.72% save rate against Danilovic's 48.09%, highlighting her effectiveness under pressure.
• Performance overview over the past year: Yastremska’s win rate is 50%, while Danilovic exhibits a significantly higher 69.09% success rate.
• Both players excel on clay, but Danilovic boasts a higher career win percentage on this surface at 70%, compared to Yastremska’s 62%.
• On grass, Yastremska holds a superior performance with a 53% win rate, while Danilovic struggles with just 47%.
• Yastremska’s main tour matches account for a 58.82% win rate, whereas Danilovic thrives in Challengers/ITF events at 84.21%.
• Yastremska’s opponents average a rank of 96.93, slightly tougher than Danilovic’s average opponent rank of 108.4, suggesting Yastremska faces higher-caliber players.
• In deciding sets over the past year, Danilovic displays resilience with a win rate of 69%, surpassing Yastremska’s 46%—could this sway the match if it goes the distance?
• Both players are almost equally effective in breakpoint conversion, with Yastremska at 37.7% and Danilovic at 37.3% efficiency in recent times.

Editorial Prediction (June 15, 2025, UTC):

This match presents an intriguing clash between two players with distinct strengths. Yastremska holds a slight edge in terms of second serve points and return game statistics, suggesting a potential advantage in rally situations. Her ability to save breakpoints at a higher rate indicates resilience under pressure.

Conversely, Danilovic exhibits a stronger recent winning trend, both overall and in deciding sets, highlighting her tenacity and consistency when matches become tightly contested. Her superior performance in the Challenger and ITF tournaments underscores her ability to execute on critical points under less pressure.

Both players shine on clay, yet Danilovic’s higher win rate on this surface and impressive deciding set performance could be the tipping point. While Yastremska has faced tougher opponents, implying readiness to face high competition, Danilovic's recent form suggests she is more likely to seize the win.

Considering these factors, Danilovic seems more likely to emerge victorious in the upcoming clash.