Noel Larwig vs Felipe Mikkelsen Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How has each player's second serve been performing recently? Mikkelsen has struggled, winning 0% of points, while Larwig has maintained a solid 41.46% success rate.
• How do they compare on return games? Mikkelsen has also been unable to win any points on opponent's second serves, whereas Larwig has a 51.16% success rate. For first serve returns, Mikkelsen has 0% while Larwig achieves 39.29%.
• How do they handle pressure situations like breakpoints? Mikkelsen has saved 0% of breakpoints, compared to Larwig's 40.91% success rate in recent matches.
• In terms of overall performance in the past year, Mikkelsen has won 33.33% of their matches, while Larwig has fared better with a win rate of 55.26%.
• What is their best playing surface? Both players perform best on hard courts: Mikkelsen has a 44% win rate, whereas Larwig leads slightly with a 49% win rate.
• In terms of competition level, how have they performed? Mikkelsen has played mostly in lower-tier events, winning only 33.33% of matches, while Larwig has had more success with a 55.26% win rate.
• How do they fare against each other directly? Larwig leads the head-to-head record, having won their only previous meeting 6-2, 6-2.
• How intense have their head-to-head matches been? There has been no deciding set or tiebreakers between them, suggesting Larwig's dominance.
• Who have they played against recently? Mikkelsen’s opponents have an average rank of 259.67, while Larwig has faced tougher competition with an average opponent rank of 78.97.
• Who performs better in deciding sets overall? Larwig has won 55% of deciding sets in the last 12 months, while Mikkelsen has yet to win any.
• Conversion of breakpoints could be crucial. Larwig converts 46.67% of breakpoints, whereas Mikkelsen again has 0% in recent form.

Editorial Prediction (May 12, 2025, UTC):

In consideration of second serve and return game statistics, Larwig holds a clear advantage, showcasing effective performance in recent matches. Mikkelsen’s inability to win points in these crucial areas may significantly affect his chances.

Larwig’s ability to handle pressure is evident from his 40.91% breakpoint save rate, which contrasts sharply with Mikkelsen’s 0%. This could play a critical role if the match becomes competitive.

Their best performances have come on hard courts, but Larwig has a slight edge in win percentage. His ability to perform better against higher-ranked players further tips the balance in his favor.

In previous encounters, Larwig's dominance is clear. With superior conversion stats on breakpoints and deciding sets, Larwig appears firmly in control.

Considering these factors, Larwig is the likely winner of the upcoming match based on the latest statistics and past performance. Mikkelsen will need to dramatically improve his game to change the expected outcome.