Nitin Kumar Sinha vs Alexis Canter Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W W L W L W W L
Form
W W L W W W L L W LHead To Head: Sinha 2 - 0 Canter
They have played 5 sets in total, with Sinha winning 4 and Canter winning 1. The last match between Sinha and Canter was at the M15 New Delhi, 24-03-2022, Second, Hard with Nitin Kumar Sinha getting the victory 6-2 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nitin Kumar Sinha | 2 |
| Alexis Canter | 0 |
M15 New Delhi(24-03-2022)
6
2
6
4
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Avanesyan VS Dolehide PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Tomova VS Eala PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
22 Apr 2025 / First
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-4 |
Stats 
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Alexis Canter
52%
(
25 of
48)
1st Serve %
51%
(
33 of
65)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 4-6 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Alexis Canter
63%
(
67 of
107)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
52%
(
35 of
67)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
63%
(
25 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
44%
(
47 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
107
Total Points Won
104
|
||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 29 | Games Won | 20 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:28:0 | Average Match Time | 2:28:0 |
| 59% (92/155) | 1st Serve % | 57% (96/169) |
| 57% (52/92) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (55/96) |
| 62% (39/63) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (32/73) |
| 52% (11/21) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (7/17) |
| 49% (82/169) | Return Points Win % | 41% (64/155) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (1/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Nitin Kumar Sinha Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Aryan Shah
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
39%
(
37 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
55 of
103)
4
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
37 of
55)
62%
(
36 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
43 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
94
|
6-2 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Sai Karteek Reddy Ganta
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
80%
(
16 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Kriish Tyagi
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
53%
(
46 of
87)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Yuvan Nandal
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
47%
(
22 of
47)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
60
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jay Clarke
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
72%
(
51 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Daniil Sarksian
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
7
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-1 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Keerthivassan Suresh
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
25 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stefan Vujic
Player
Nitin Kumar Sinha
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
59%
(
78 of
132)
10
Aces
8
13
Double Faults
7
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
60%
(
27 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
31 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
47 of
132)
123
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(11) 6-7(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Dev Javia
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Alexis Canter Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Alexis Canter
80%
(
48 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Jonas Pelle Hartenstein
55%
(
65 of
119)
1st Serve %
59%
(
77 of
131)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
46 of
65)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
49 of
77)
48%
(
26 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
25 of
54)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
47 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
57 of
131)
129
Total Points Won
121
|
6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(1) 3-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Alexis Canter
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
77%
(
55 of
71)
2
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
0
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
46%
(
29 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Alexis Canter
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
89%
(
17 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Daniel Kliebhan
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
64%
(
23 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
39%
(
9 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
46%
(
27 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
51
Total Points Won
55
|
4-6 6-3 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexis Canter
Player
Dylan Davies
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
48%
(
22 of
46)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
16 of
22)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
62
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50% (168/171) | Win/Loss | 52% (207/194) |
| 49% (381/390) | Sets Win/Loss | 52% (464/428) |
| 51% (3644/3533) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (4368/4140) |
| 49% (118/123) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (141/117) |
| 52% (50/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 47% (7/8) |
| 0% (0/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 48% (55/60) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 31% (4/9) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.19 |
| 808 | Aces Total | 773 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 556 | Total Double Faults | 468 |
| 1:12:34 | Average Match Time | 1:7:48 |
| 411.51 | Average Opponent Rank | 330.71 |
| 60% (9306/15531) | 1st Serve % | 63% (10871/17284) |
| 67% (6216/9306) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (7256/10871) |
| 48% (3001/6225) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3129/6413) |
| 44% (655/1502) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (560/1383) |
| 40% (6240/15639) | Return Points Win % | 37% (6120/16584) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 21% (3/11) | Challenger W/L | 18% (2/9) |
| 51% (165/160) | Futures W/L | 53% (205/185) |
| 50% (161/324) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (205/398) |
| 60% (3/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 44% (31/70) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (48/94) |
| 52% (51/98) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (41/93) |
| 83% (164/136) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (215/184) |
| 16% (164/27) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (215/31) |
| 18% (175/31) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 12% (186/23) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
