Nithesa Selvaraj vs Amelia Zylberman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How do they perform on their second serve? Over the last 6 months, Zylberman has managed to win 43.64% of points from their second serve, while Selvaraj hasn’t won any.
• Analyzing return game effectiveness, Zylberman has captured 37.78% of their opponent's second serve points, whereas Selvaraj has failed to win any.
• When returning the first serve, Zylberman secures 33.33% of points, contrasting with Selvaraj’s 0%.
• Saving breakpoints under duress, Zylberman is successful 35.29% of the time, a stark difference from Selvaraj's 0% success rate.
• Considering match performance, Zylberman has a 26.67% match win rate over the last year, while Selvaraj boasts a 100% win rate, though only with 2 matches played.
• Which surface favors them? Zylberman excels on Hard courts with a 39% win rate, while Selvaraj triumphs on the same surface with an impressive 69% win rate.
• Examining competition level, Zylberman competes predominantly at Challengers and ITF tournaments over $10,000 but wins only 23.08% of matches. Selvaraj has played less, exclusively in Futures/ITF $10K categories, with a perfect win record.
• Looking at opponent quality, Zylberman has faced players with an average rank of 50.47; in contrast, Selvaraj has not competed against any ranked player over the past year.
• If their match reaches a deciding set, both players have not won any deciding sets in the last 12 months.
• How about their breakpoint conversion rate? Zylberman converts breakpoints at 37.5%, whereas Selvaraj stands at 0% in converting such opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 5, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming tennis clash, the statistics highlight stark contrasts in the players' recent performances.

While Zylberman exhibits a consistent, albeit modest, ability to win points on their second serve and handle return games, Selvaraj has yet to demonstrate effectiveness in these critical areas.

Although Selvaraj holds a flawless win rate in recent matches, this record comes from a smaller sample size against potentially lower-ranked opponents, which adds an element of uncertainty to their competitive level.

Given Zylberman's proven track record in converting breakpoints and handling high-pressure situations, despite a lower overall win rate, they seem to have a tactical edge over a less tested Selvaraj.

Therefore, Zylberman is more likely to triumph in this encounter.