Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nina Stadler vs Naima Karamoko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Stadler vs Karamoko analysis and find out who is favored!
Nina Stadler vs Naima Karamoko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Stadler has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Karamoko has won 42.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Stadler, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Karamoko has won 58.19%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 38.43% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Stadler has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Karamoko has saved 48.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Stadler has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Karamoko winning 55.56% (W/L 30/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Stadler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 58% (W/L 73/ 53), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 54% (W/L 79/ 66). Karamoko has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 23/ 19), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 38/ 59).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Stadler winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Stadler winning 2 and Karamoko winning 0. The last match between Stadler and Karamoko was at the Sion, 31-08-2016, Second, Clay with Nina Stadler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:35:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Stadler and Karamoko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Stadler winning 0 times and Karamoko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Stadler winning 1, and Karamoko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Stadler has played against opponents with an average rank of while Karamoko has played against players with an average rank of 197.48.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Stadler has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Karamoko has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Stadler has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Karamoko has converted 54.2% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Stadler 1 - 0 Karamoko
Ret.
Rank
532
High
28
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
824
Rank
824
High
26
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
55% (181-148)
Career Total W/L
47% (125-143)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
44% (7-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nina Stadler | Naima Karamoko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:35:0 | 1:35:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (29/57) | 55% (36/66) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 61% (22/36) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (16/28) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 67% (2/3) |
| Return Points W% | 48% (32/66) | 35% (20/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-1 |
Stats 
Nina Stadler
Player
Naima Karamoko
51%
(
29 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nina Stadler | Naima Karamoko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 46% (17/20) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (183/173) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.17 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 29 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.36 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 63 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:19:15 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 288 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 61% (484/788) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (302/484) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 38% (117/304) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 50% (47/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (345/762) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/16) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 40% (2/5) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 78% (9/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 22% (9/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (7/0) |
Nina Stadler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Arina Gabriela Vasilescu
Player
Nina Stadler
52%
(
34 of
66)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tara Wurth
Player
Nina Stadler
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
25 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Nina Stadler
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
17 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Shavit Kimchi
Player
Nina Stadler
55%
(
36 of
65)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
31 of
75)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Clara Vlasselaer
Player
Nina Stadler
38%
(
19 of
50)
1st Serve %
51%
(
22 of
43)
2
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
10
79%
(
15 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
5 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
19 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
59
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Diana Marcinkevica
Player
Nina Stadler
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
63%
(
60 of
95)
1
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
26 of
60)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
48%
(
39 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
53 of
95)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nina Stadler
Player
Gabriela Ce
66%
(
43 of
65)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
4
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
1
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
20 of
51)
27%
(
6 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
48%
(
31 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
77
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nina Stadler
Player
Miyabi Inoue
57%
(
33 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
33 of
66)
3
Aces
0
10
Double Faults
4
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
24%
(
6 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
36 of
66)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Margot Yerolymos
Player
Nina Stadler
56%
(
41 of
73)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
3
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
10
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
28%
(
9 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
8 of
29)
39%
(
7 of
18)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
48%
(
35 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
38 of
64)
76
Total Points Won
61
|
6-0 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rosa Vicens Mas
Player
Nina Stadler
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
8
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Naima Karamoko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Emily Appleton
Player
Naima Karamoko
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
69%
(
51 of
74)
0
Aces
4
9
Double Faults
7
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
74)
75
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Angela Lazic
52%
(
15 of
29)
1st Serve %
51%
(
21 of
41)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
12
100%
(
15 of
15)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
7 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
52
Total Points Won
18
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ksenia Laskutova
Player
Naima Karamoko
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ania Hertel
Player
Naima Karamoko
61%
(
63 of
103)
1st Serve %
57%
(
59 of
103)
5
Aces
12
9
Double Faults
9
76%
(
48 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
38%
(
15 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
40 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
40 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
103
|
7-6(2) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Naima Karamoko
Player
Cynthia Wanjala
52%
(
27 of
52)
1st Serve %
59%
(
22 of
37)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Natalia Szabanin
Player
Naima Karamoko
50%
(
53 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
101)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
14
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
41 of
55)
44%
(
24 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
15 of
46)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
42%
(
45 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
101)
107
Total Points Won
101
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 5-7 10-7 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
view more
Stadler Vs Karamoko Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
