Prediction of Nina Pantic vs Mami Inoue Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Pantic vs M. Inoue

Nina Pantic

CAN

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Mami Inoue

USA

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Pantic 1 - 0 Inoue

They have played 3 sets in total, with Nina Pantic winning 2 and Mami Inoue winning 1. The last match between Nina Pantic and Mami Inoue was at the Southlake, 27-06-2005, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Pantic	1
Inoue	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Southlake(06-27-05)

Stats

Nina Pantic

Mami Inoue

N. Pantic vs M. Inoue H2H Profile

N. Pantic	Stats	M. Inoue
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
34.09% (15-29)	Career Total W/L	26.47% (9-25)
1	Hard	0
1	Titles	0
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Pantic vs M. Inoue Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nina Pantic has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Mami Inoue has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nina Pantic, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Mami Inoue has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nina Pantic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Mami Inoue has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nina Pantic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Mami Inoue winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nina Pantic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 13/19), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 13% (W/L 1/7). Mami Inoue has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 41% (W/L 2/4), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 6/18).
Player level: In the last year, Nina Pantic has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Mami Inoue has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nina Pantic winning 1 times and Mami Inoue being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nina Pantic winning 2 and Mami Inoue winning 1.
The last match between Nina Pantic and Mami Inoue was at the Southlake, 27-06-2005, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 7-6(4) 4-6 6-3.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nina Pantic has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Mami Inoue has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nina Pantic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Mami Inoue has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nina Pantic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Mami Inoue has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nina Pantic vs Mami Inoue Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Pantic vs M. Inoue H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Pantic	Stats	M. Inoue
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
17	Games Won	15
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Pantic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Laguna Nigel - 26-01-2009
R1 Soledad EsperonS. Esperon	L	6-1 6-0	Stats
Waterloo - 30-06-2008
R1 Lena LitvakL. Litvak	L	6-0 6-7(2) 7-5	Stats
Wichita - 23-06-2008
R1 Emelyn StarrE. Starr	L	6-1 6-4	Stats
St.Leo - Tampa Bay - 07-01-2008
R1 Story Tweedie-YatesS. Tweedie-Yates	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Augusta - 22-10-2007
R1 Madison BrengleM. Brengle	L	6-1 6-3	Stats

View All

M. Inoue Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Cleveland - 12-10-2009
R2 Angelina GabuevaA. Gabueva	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
R1 Whitney JonesW. Jones	W	2-6 6-2 6-1	Stats
Williamsburg - 05-10-2009
R1 Shelby RogersS. Rogers	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
St.Joseph - 27-07-2009
R2 Kaitlyn ChristianK. Christian	L	6-1 6-3	Stats
R1 Yuliana MotylY. Motyl	W	6-1 6-2	Stats

View All

N. Pantic vs M. Inoue Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Pantic	Stats	M. Inoue
34.09% (15/29)	YTD Win/Loss	26.47% (9/25)
37.62% (38/63)	Sets Win/Loss	27.78% (20/52)
44.61% (418/519)	Games Win/Loss	37.88% (214/351)
40.63% (13/19)	Hard Win/Loss	25.00% (6/18)
12.50% (1/7)	Clay Win/Loss	33.33% (2/4)
25.00% (1/3)	Indoor Hard W/L	25.00% (1/3)
0.02	Double Faults Per Game	0.01
7	Total Double Faults	4
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
368.93	Average Opponent Rank	364.03
59% (57/97)	1st Serve %	69% (59/85)
40% (23/57)	1st Serve Win %	46% (27/59)
33% (13/40)	2nd Serve Win %	35% (9/26)
67% (4/6)	Break Points Won % (Total)	100% (3/3)
36% (30/83)	Return Points Win %	24% (20/83)
0.00% (0/2)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)	Main Tour W/L	0.00% (0/3)
11.76% (2/15)	Challenger W/L	0.00% (0/3)
52.00% (13/12)	Futures W/L	32.14% (9/19)
34% (15/44)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	26% (9/34)
60% (6/10)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/3)
38% (5/13)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (2/4)
69% (16/11)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (7/7)
31% (16/5)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (7/0)
14% (28/4)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	7% (27/2)