Nikola Slavic vs Roy Keegan Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Wojtek Kolan

Published on 20 Oct at 01:29 AM UTC

HEAD TO HEAD

N. Slavic vs R. Keegan

Nikola Slavic
Nikola Slavic

Flag SWE SWE

l
w
l
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
Roy Keegan
Roy Keegan

Flag GBR GBR

l
l
l
w
l
w
l
l
w
l

1

Win

1

Played

0

Win

25
Age
20
-
Height
-
864
C. Rank
0
839
Best Rank
0
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Head-to-head: Slavic 1 - 0 Keegan

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nikola Slavic winning 2 and Roy Keegan winning 0. The last match between Nikola Slavic and Roy Keegan was at the M25 Sheffield, 20-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: I.hard, with Nikola Slavic getting the victory 6-2 6-0.

PlayersHead To Head Match Wins
Slavic1
Keegan0
Last 1 H2H Matches:

(Q3M25 Sheffield(10-20-25)

I.hard
SWE Flag
Nikola Slavic
6
6
GBR Flag
Roy Keegan
2
0

N. Slavic vs R. Keegan H2H Profile

Stats
$0Career Prize Money$0
58.73% (74-52)Career Total W/L22.22% (4-14)
1Indoor0
1Total H2H Matches0
0% (0-0)YTD Win/Loss0% (0-0)

N. Slavic vs R. Keegan Match Preview:

  • When it comes to second serve points, Roy Keegan shines with a win rate of 57.14%, compared to Nikola Slavic's 45.77%. What might this indicate about their reliability under pressure?
  • Nikola Slavic outperforms Keegan in first serve returns, capturing 25.57% compared to Keegan's 18.52%. Could this give Slavic an edge in the return game?
  • While Keegan has a stronger second serve return percentage at 64.52% versus Slavic's 46.57%, does this mean Keegan has more potential to break serve frequently?
  • Under pressure, Keegan boasts a breakpoint save rate of 66.67% compared to Slavic's 58.60%, implying more resilience in crucial situations.
  • Over the last year, Slavic has a significantly superior match win rate of 66.20%, while Keegan sits at 37.50%. Can this historical dominance project Slavic as a favorite?
  • Both players perform best on indoor hard surfaces with a win rate of 62%. Does this suggest even footing when playing on this surface type?
  • Slavic has been more active at the Futures/Satellites level, with a success rate of 67.14%, contrasting with Keegan's 37.50%. Might Slavic's experience offer a competitive advantage?
  • While Keegan plays opponents with higher average ranks, Slavic contends with those ranked 232.59. Could Keegan's match exposure to stronger players aid in his development and performance?
  • In deciding sets, Slavic has a minor edge with 55% win rate over Keegan’s 50%. How crucial could this be if the match gets tight?

Editorial Prediction (October 20, 2025, UTC):

Nikola Slavic demonstrates a consistent performance advantage over the past year, winning a substantial proportion of his matches. His ability to secure points on first serve returns provides a critical edge over his opponent.

Roy Keegan shows proficiency in both second serve points won and return efficiency. While this positions him well in individual game situations, his lower overall match win rate suggests struggles in closing out sets and matches.

Though Keegan benefits from facing more highly-ranked opponents, Slavic's consistent track record and experience at the Futures/Satellites level likely provide him the stability and confidence necessary for victory.

Considering the statistical analysis, Nikola Slavic is more likely to triumph in their upcoming match, given his proven track record and adaptability under competitive circumstances.

Nikola Slavic vs Roy Keegan Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Slavic vs R. Keegan H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

Stats
1H2H Matches Won0
2Sets Won0
12Games Won2
7Aces (Total)0
1Total Double Faults5
0:52:36Average Match Time0:52:36
81% (25/31)1st Serve %61% (25/41)
92% (23/25)1st Serve Win %48% (12/25)
83% (5/6)2nd Serve Win %31% (5/16)
71% (5/7)Break Pts Won %0% (0/0)
59% (24/41)Return Points Win %10% (3/31)
100% (1/1)Best‑of‑3 Win %0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)1st Set Won, Won Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/1)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (0/0)
0% (0/0)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

2nd Serve Win %: Slavic 50%, Keegan 33%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Slavic 52%, Keegan 47%.
Break Points Saved %: Slavic 63%, Keegan 48%.

N. Slavic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
ClayM15 Antalya - 10-11-2025

R2

GBRF. Gill
L
6-3 6-4

R1

RUSF. Sosedkin
W
6-1 6-1

Q3

ROUG. Claudiu
W
6-1 6-1

Q2

ROUC. Apostol
W
6-3 6-4

Q1

GERR. Giotis
W
6-3 6-4

R. Keegan Recent Matches Played

OPPONENTRESULTSCOREH2H
HardM25 Heraklion - 24-11-2025

Q3

FRAY. Sborowsky
L
6-1 2-6 10-3

Q2

GREM. Galanakis
W
6-0 6-0
I.hardM25 Glasgow - 27-10-2025

Q1

GBRF. Murgett
L
6-1 6-3
I.hardM25 Sheffield - 20-10-2025

Q3

SWEN. Slavic
L
6-2 6-0

Q1

ITAL. Taddia
W
7-6(2) 6-7(4) 10-7
banner

N. Slavic vs R. Keegan Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

Stats
58.73% (74/52)YTD Win/Loss22.22% (4/14)
57.34% (164/122)Sets Win/Loss25.64% (10/29)
53.37% (1416/1237)Games Win/Loss41.51% (154/217)
52.17% (12/11)Hard Win/Loss20.00% (3/12)
60.00% (36/24)Clay Win/Loss0% (0/0)
60.47% (26/17)Indoor Hard W/L33.33% (1/2)
0.27Aces Per Game0.02
354Aces Total3
0.13Double Faults Per Game0.12
171Total Double Faults21
1st MatchAverage Match Time1st Match
277.44Average Opponent Rank136.72
63% (2900/4583)1st Serve %68% (160/236)
70% (2026/2900)1st Serve Win %65% (104/160)
49% (823/1683)2nd Serve Win %38% (29/76)
41% (177/433)Break Points Won % (Total)47% (8/17)
38% (1742/4576)Return Points Win %38% (96/254)
0.00% (0/2)Main Tour W/L0% (0/0)
59.68% (74/50)Futures W/L22.22% (4/14)
59% (74/126)Best of 3 Sets Win %22% (4/18)
37% (10/27)Tiebreaks Win % (Total)40% (2/5)
53% (18/34)Deciding Set Win %33% (1/3)
88% (72/63)1st Set Won, Won Match100% (4/4)
13% (72/9)1st Set Won, Lost Match0% (4/0)
20% (54/11)1st Set Lost, Won Match0% (14/0)

Other Tennis Predictions Today

Mon, 01 Dec, 09:00 AM
Prediction
INDU. Kamboj
INDA. V. Duddupudi
W1
1.22
W2
3.74
Mon, 01 Dec, 08:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Kodancha
INDC. Warik
W1
2.58
W2
1.43
Mon, 01 Dec, 07:00 AM
Prediction
INDD. Munim
INDA. Venkataraman
W1
1.84
W2
1.84
Sun, 30 Nov, 10:05 PM
Prediction
COLJ. S. Gomezq
COLN. Mejia2
W1
4.45
W2
1.159