Nicolas Mejia vs Mats Rosenkranz Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 01 Oct at 07:19 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Mejia vs M. Rosenkranz

COL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Mejia 1 - 0 Rosenkranz
They have played 3 sets in total, with Nicolas Mejia winning 2 and Mats Rosenkranz winning 1. The last match between Nicolas Mejia and Mats Rosenkranz was at the Tiburon Challenger, 01-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Draw getting the victory 2-6 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Mejia | 1 |
| Rosenkranz | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Tiburon Challenger(10-01-25)
N. Mejia vs M. Rosenkranz H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $19,480 | Career Prize Money | $4,755 |
| 53.22% (256-225) | Career Total W/L | 51.75% (326-304) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 9 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 20.00% (1-4) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. Mejia vs M. Rosenkranz Match Preview:
- Comparing second serve performance over the last 6 months, Mats Rosenkranz edges out Nicolas Mejia with a win percentage of 46.31% against Mejia's 44.00%.
- On returning, Nicolas Mejia slightly outshines with 44.04% success on opponent's second serves compared to Rosenkranz's 43.24%.
- When returning first serves, Mejia again leads with a success rate of 29.01%, while Rosenkranz is lower at 22.37%.
- Under pressure, Mejia saves 54.87% of breakpoints, marginally outperforming Rosenkranz who saves 52.14%.
- In terms of matches won over the last year, Rosenkranz is ahead with a win rate of 61.73% versus Mejia's 50.72%. Could this indicate a stronger competitive edge?
- Surface performance shows Mejia’s strength on clay (57% win rate), but weakness on grass (0% win rate), while Rosenkranz favors grass (57% win rate) over hard courts (44% win rate).
- At the Challengers/ITF level, Rosenkranz has a slight edge, winning 51.16% of his matches compared to Mejia’s 50.88%.
- Assessing the quality of opponents, Mejia has faced slightly higher-ranked players (average rank: 358.46) than Rosenkranz (average rank: 377.75).
- In deciding sets, Rosenkranz has a higher win rate of 65%, suggesting stronger late-match performance, while Mejia wins 52%.
Editorial Prediction (October 1, 2025, UTC):
Nicolas Mejia shows remarkable dexterity with returns, both on first and second serves, offering a tactical advantage during rallies. Additionally, his ability to save breakpoints slightly exceeds that of Mats Rosenkranz.
Despite Mejia's robust returning stats, Mats Rosenkranz has demonstrated superior winning momentum over the past year, boasting a higher match win percentage and more resilience in deciding sets.
When the match gravitates towards crucial moments, Rosenkranz’s success in deciding sets becomes highly significant. While Mejia is strong on clay, Rosenkranz is proficient on both grass and in late-match scenarios.
Considering the cumulative advantages, Mats Rosenkranz appears more likely to claim victory in this upcoming match, especially in potential deciding moments.
Nicolas Mejia vs Mats Rosenkranz Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Mejia vs M. Rosenkranz H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 16 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 9 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:50:17 | Average Match Time | 2:50:17 |
| 63% (58/92) | 1st Serve % | 65% (70/108) |
| 67% (39/58) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (47/70) |
| 47% (16/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (16/38) |
| 36% (4/11) | Break Pts Won % | 50% (5/10) |
| 42% (45/108) | Return Points Win % | 40% (37/92) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Mejia Recent Matches Played
M. Rosenkranz Recent Matches Played

N. Mejia vs M. Rosenkranz Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.22% (256/225) | YTD Win/Loss | 51.75% (326/304) |
| 52.92% (589/524) | Sets Win/Loss | 50.62% (734/716) |
| 51.80% (5438/5061) | Games Win/Loss | 50.84% (7180/6943) |
| 52.76% (105/94) | Hard Win/Loss | 44.59% (66/82) |
| 57.61% (140/103) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.12% (112/116) |
| 28.95% (11/27) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.16% (139/100) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.58 |
| 1413 | Aces Total | 4035 |
| 0.2 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 1017 | Total Double Faults | 2013 |
| 1:44:12 | Average Match Time | 1:24:26 |
| 459.61 | Average Opponent Rank | 466.73 |
| 62% (19011/30506) | 1st Serve % | 60% (22335/37167) |
| 67% (12814/19011) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (16649/22335) |
| 51% (5838/11496) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (7134/14832) |
| 42% (1283/3076) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1228/3173) |
| 40% (12229/30517) | Return Points Win % | 37% (13901/37727) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 22.22% (4/14) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38.46% (5/8) | Main Tour W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 48.90% (133/139) | Challenger W/L | 47.34% (89/99) |
| 64.77% (114/62) | Futures W/L | 54.13% (236/200) |
| 53% (250/475) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 52% (319/619) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 52% (81/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (116/237) |
| 47% (73/155) | Deciding Set Win % | 56% (111/198) |
| 84% (262/221) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (317/269) |
| 16% (262/41) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (317/48) |
| 15% (219/33) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (312/57) |