Nicolas Ian Kotzen vs Braden Shick Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Ian Kotzen vs B. Shick

Nicolas Ian Kotzen
USA
w
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
22
-
Height
-
862
C. Rank
866
850
Best Rank
866
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-

Braden Shick
USA
l
w
w
w
l
w
w
w
w
w
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
22
Age
22
-
Height
-
862
C. Rank
866
850
Best Rank
866
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$0
Career Money
$0
-
Plays
-
Head-to-head: Kotzen 1 - 0 Shick
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolas Ian Kotzen winning 2 and Braden Shick winning 0. The last match between Nicolas Ian Kotzen and Braden Shick was at the M25 Edwardsville, 30-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nicolas Ian Kotzen getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kotzen | 1 |
| Shick | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Edwardsville(07-30-25)
Nicolas Ian Kotzen
7
6
Braden Shick
6
4
N. I. Kotzen vs B. Shick H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.67% (36-18) | Career Total W/L | 58.67% (44-31) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. I. Kotzen vs B. Shick Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nicolas Ian Kotzen has won 48.99% of points on their second serve, while Braden Shick has won 46.88%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nicolas Ian Kotzen, in recent form, has won 42.74% of their opponent's second serve points, while Braden Shick has won 40.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.20% and 25.03% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nicolas Ian Kotzen has saved 59.86% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Braden Shick has saved 48.55% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nicolas Ian Kotzen has won 62.50% of matches played (W/L 15/9), with Braden Shick winning 62.86% (W/L 22/13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nicolas Ian Kotzen has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 33/15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 3/3). Braden Shick has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 69% (W/L 4/2), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 33/25).
- Player level: In the last year, Nicolas Ian Kotzen has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.18% of matches (W/L 15/7), where as Braden Shick has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 21/10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nicolas Ian Kotzen winning 1 times and Braden Shick being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolas Ian Kotzen winning 2 and Braden Shick winning 0.
- The last match between Nicolas Ian Kotzen and Braden Shick was at the M25 Edwardsville, 30-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nicolas Ian Kotzen getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:17.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nicolas Ian Kotzen has played against opponents with an average rank of 350.5 while Braden Shick has played against players with an average rank of 321.8.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nicolas Ian Kotzen has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Braden Shick has won 38% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nicolas Ian Kotzen has converted 21.98% of breakpoint opportunities, and Braden Shick has converted 27.78% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nicolas Ian Kotzen vs Braden Shick Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. I. Kotzen vs B. Shick H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 2:0:17 | Average Match Time | 2:0:17 |
| 66% (44/67) | 1st Serve % | 55% (37/67) |
| 73% (32/44) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (25/37) |
| 61% (14/23) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (18/30) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 17% (1/6) |
| 36% (24/67) | Return Points Win % | 31% (21/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Kotzen 54%, Shick 53%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Kotzen 48%, Shick 49%.
Break Points Saved %: Kotzen 73%, Shick 64%.
N. I. Kotzen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 7-5 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 6-7(6) 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 7-6(5) | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 6-2 | ||
Q1 | W | 4-6 6-3 10-4 | ||
B. Shick Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
F | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
SF | W | 6-3 6-0 | ||
QF | W | 6-1 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 3-0 ret. | ||

N. I. Kotzen vs B. Shick Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.67% (36/18) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.67% (44/31) |
| 63.49% (80/46) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.75% (94/66) |
| 54.18% (667/564) | Games Win/Loss | 54.12% (801/679) |
| 68.75% (33/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.90% (33/25) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (4/2) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 63.64% (7/4) |
| 0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.3 |
| 210 | Aces Total | 218 |
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 102 | Total Double Faults | 115 |
| 1:28:1 | Average Match Time | 1:4:21 |
| 297.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 293.33 |
| 62% (1729/2768) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1754/3047) |
| 69% (1195/1729) | 1st Serve Win % | 70% (1227/1754) |
| 52% (540/1039) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (654/1293) |
| 40% (101/254) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (125/281) |
| 40% (1076/2724) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1148/2969) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 69.23% (36/16) | Futures W/L | 63.24% (43/25) |
| 67% (36/54) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (43/73) |
| 80% (12/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 50% (10/20) |
| 56% (10/18) | Deciding Set Win % | 42% (5/12) |
| 85% (34/29) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (44/41) |
| 15% (34/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (44/3) |
| 35% (20/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (31/3) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
03:30 AM 16/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction12:30 PM 16/11/25
Prediction11:05 PM 15/11/25
Prediction12:55 AM 16/11/25
Prediction02:00 PM 16/11/25
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips
15 Nov 2025
Carlos Alcaraz vs Felix Auger Aliassime Prediction – ATP Nitto ATP Finals – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Rebecca Sramkova vs Simona Waltert Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group C – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Maria Camila Osorio Serrano vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Billie Jean King Cup, PO, Group D – 15th November 2025 Best Bets
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Auger-Aliassime Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Alcaraz Vs Auger-Aliassime H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
15 Nov 2025
Prediction Of Sinner Vs Minaur H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Nitto Atp Finals 2025?
Top Predictions Today
H2H 5-10
H2H 0-0
23:05
H2H 1-0
00:55
H2H 0-1
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Brisbane 3 Challenger
Australia
Champaign Challenger
United States
Drummondville Challenger
Canada
Kobe Challenger
Japan
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Montevideo Challenger
Uruguay
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Antalya
Turkey
M15 Bhubaneswar
India
M15 Gimcheon
Korea, Rep.
M15 Heraklion
Greece
M15 Kuala Lumpur
Malaysia
M15 Luanda
Angola
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 San Gregorio di Catania
Italy
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Manzanillo
Mexico
M25 Monastir
Tunisia
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal