Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Shintaro Imai Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Aug at 09:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Budkov Kjaer vs S. Imai

NOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kjaer 1 - 0 Imai
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer winning 2 and Shintaro Imai winning 0. The last match between Nicolai Budkov Kjaer and Shintaro Imai was at the Astana Challenger, 02-08-2025, Round: SF, Surface: Hard, with Nicolai Budkov Kjaer getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kjaer | 1 |
| Imai | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(SF) Astana Challenger(08-02-25)
N. B. Kjaer vs S. Imai H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $58,345 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 65.52% (76-40) | Career Total W/L | 63.18% (326-190) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 6 | Titles | 15 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 37.50% (3-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
N. B. Kjaer vs S. Imai Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance shows a slight edge for Kjaer, winning 42.83% of points compared to Imai's 42.13% in the past 6 months.
- How do they fare on return games? Imai has been more effective at returning second serves, winning 48.54% of points, while Kjaer trails at 46.03%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Kjaer excels, capturing 29.5% of points, outperforming Imai at 24.68%.
- Under pressure, Imai has a slight advantage, saving 56.13% of breakpoints against them compared to Kjaer’s 50.3%.
- Considering overall match wins over the last year, both players have nearly identical records, with Kjaer at 62.32% and Imai at 61.11%.
- Surface preference suggests Imai prefers clay courts (80% win rate), whereas Kjaer thrives on indoor hard courts (68%). Both find grass more challenging, though Kjaer slightly more so.
- Reflecting on competition level, Imai has mainly encountered opponents ranked around 498, while Kjaer’s opponents average a rank of 312, suggesting Kjaer often competes against stronger players.
- Delving into deciding set resilience, Kjaer has an upper hand with a 61% win in deciding sets against all competitors, slightly above Imai's 56% rate.
- On break point opportunities, Kjaer comes out ahead by converting 36.53% compared to Imai’s 30%. This could influence critical moments in the match.
Editorial Prediction (August 2, 2025, UTC):
In assessing their recent performance, Kjaer displays a slight advantage in several key areas that often determine match outcomes. Their superior ability to convert break points and efficient first serve return statistics can provide crucial leverage.
Despite competing against a more challenging field, Kjaer's results have shown resilience and adaptability, especially in deciding sets where they have outperformed Imai.
While Imai shows proficiency under pressure and excels on clay, the current match conditions may favor Kjaer's strategic strengths and recent form.
Considering these insights, Kjaer is likely the preferred candidate to secure a win in this forthcoming tennis match.
Nicolai Budkov Kjaer vs Shintaro Imai Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. B. Kjaer vs S. Imai H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:23:21 | Average Match Time | 1:23:21 |
| 61% (34/56) | 1st Serve % | 55% (36/66) |
| 82% (28/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (26/36) |
| 73% (16/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (15/30) |
| 67% (2/3) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (25/66) | Return Points Win % | 21% (12/56) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. B. Kjaer Recent Matches Played
S. Imai Recent Matches Played

N. B. Kjaer vs S. Imai Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.52% (76/40) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.18% (326/190) |
| 62.17% (166/101) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.86% (706/454) |
| 53.74% (1365/1175) | Games Win/Loss | 54.43% (5865/4911) |
| 63.16% (12/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.33% (285/165) |
| 66.07% (37/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 80.00% (4/1) |
| 68.57% (24/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.71% (34/22) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 60.00% (3/2) |
| 0.31 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 383 | Aces Total | 1862 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 276 | Total Double Faults | 1239 |
| 1:34:40 | Average Match Time | 1:30:41 |
| 340.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 568.71 |
| 62% (4605/7425) | 1st Serve % | 58% (17087/29567) |
| 68% (3132/4605) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (12185/17087) |
| 52% (1459/2820) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (6259/12479) |
| 45% (346/766) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1404/3072) |
| 41% (3070/7407) | Return Points Win % | 41% (12360/29918) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 68.33% (41/19) | Challenger W/L | 45.05% (41/50) |
| 74.29% (26/9) | Futures W/L | 67.22% (285/139) |
| 66% (76/115) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (318/498) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 14% (1/7) |
| 69% (22/32) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (79/146) |
| 61% (22/36) | Deciding Set Win % | 57% (77/134) |
| 91% (69/63) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (319/287) |
| 9% (69/6) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (319/32) |
| 28% (47/13) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (196/37) |