Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nico Matic vs Florent Diep Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Matic vs Diep analysis and find out who is favored!
Nico Matic vs Florent Diep Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Matic has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Diep has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Matic, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Diep has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Matic has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Diep has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Matic has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Diep winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Matic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 102/ 65), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 25/ 20). Diep has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 141/ 132), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 6).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Matic winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Matic winning 4 and Diep winning 0. The last match between Matic and Diep was at the Serbia F11, 07-09-2015, Second, Clay with Nico Matic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Matic and Diep have played a deciding set 0 times, with Matic winning 0 times and Diep 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Matic winning 0, and Diep 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Matic has played against opponents with an average rank of while Diep has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Matic has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Diep has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Matic has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Diep has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Matic 2 - 0 Diep
Ret.
Rank
465
High
32
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
592
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
59% (130-90)
Career Total W/L
51% (176-171)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nico Matic | Florent Diep |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 11 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 | |||||
| 6-1 6-3 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nico Matic | Florent Diep |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Nico Matic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats 
Baptiste Crepatte
Player
Nico Matic
58%
(
37 of
64)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
18 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Dominik Boehler
Player
Nico Matic
58%
(
53 of
91)
1st Serve %
73%
(
74 of
102)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
4
57%
(
30 of
53)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
38 of
74)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
49%
(
45 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
102)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 7-6(4) 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nico Matic
Player
Filip Bergevi
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
26 of
41)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nico Matic
Player
Kai Wehnelt
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve %
73%
(
29 of
40)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
29%
(
12 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
26
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-0 3-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q2 | 4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
view more
Florent Diep Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
66%
(
35 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
12 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Florent Diep
71%
(
41 of
58)
1st Serve %
48%
(
28 of
58)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Anis Ghorbel
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
19 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Ignacio Alcalde
Player
Florent Diep
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
22 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
31 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabriel Petit
Player
Florent Diep
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
50 of
77)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
28 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
85
Total Points Won
69
|
3-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Florent Diep
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
40 of
68)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ugo Humbert
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
55 of
92)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
92)
4
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
44 of
55)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
42 of
50)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
33 of
92)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
3-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Christian Lindell
Player
Florent Diep
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
63 of
104)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
31%
(
27 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(8) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Florent Diep
Player
Lucas Catarina
54%
(
44 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
56 of
90)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
80%
(
35 of
44)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
59%
(
22 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
24 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
30 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
84
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Pierre Delage
Player
Florent Diep
60%
(
45 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Matic Vs Diep Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
