Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Hardt vs Marko Stakusic Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Hardt vs Stakusic analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Hardt vs Marko Stakusic Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Hardt has won 47.02% of points on his second serve, while Stakusic has won 40.74%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Hardt, in recent form, has won 56.89% of his opponent's second serve points, while Stakusic has won 50.29%. The same stats for first serve returns are 41.85% and 26.63% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Hardt has saved 56.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Stakusic has saved 56.94% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Hardt has won 59.46% of matches played (W/L 44/ 30), with Stakusic winning 52.08% (W/L 25/ 23) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Hardt has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 136/ 81), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Stakusic has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 16/ 15), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 39% (W/L 9/ 14).
- Player level: In the last year, Hardt has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.49% of matches (W/L 23/ 20), where as Stakusic has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.82% of matches (W/L 25/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Hardt has played against opponents with an average rank of 295.66 while Stakusic has played against players with an average rank of 92.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Hardt has won 52% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Stakusic has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Hardt has converted 48.32% of breakpoint opportunities, and Stakusic has converted 44.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Hardt 0 - 0 Stakusic
229
Rank
201
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
L
W
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
61% (212-137)
Career Total W/L
47% (47-54)
71% (27-11)
YTD W/L
50% (6-6)
$54,350
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| w/o | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Hardt | Marko Stakusic |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (27/11) | 50% (6/6) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 65% (58/31) | 50% (12/12) |
| Games Win/Loss | 56% (460/356) | 52% (112/103) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 55% (6/5) | 75% (3/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 78% (21/6) | 20% (1/4) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.13 | 0.1 |
| Aces Total | 53 | 10 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.12 |
| DFs Total | 140 | 13 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:1 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 329 | 60.92 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (1686/2558) | 63% (194/307) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (1088/1686) | 65% (127/194) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (410/872) | 42% (48/113) |
| BPs Won% Total | 48% (173/358) | 48% (10/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 47% (1291/2738) | 37% (108/294) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 75% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 64% (9/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 75% (15/5) | 50% (6/6) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 71% (27/38) | 55% (6/11) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 69% (9/13) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (25/23) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (25/2) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 31% (13/4) | 0% (6/0) |
Nick Hardt Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Tomas Martin Etcheverry
Player
Nick Hardt
79%
(
54 of
68)
1st Serve %
82%
(
49 of
60)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Martin Landaluce
67%
(
54 of
81)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
88)
4
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
63%
(
34 of
54)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
88)
87
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Hugo Dellien
70%
(
78 of
111)
1st Serve %
73%
(
90 of
123)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
3
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
26%
(
5 of
19)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
123)
122
Total Points Won
112
|
4-6 7-6(0) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Facundo Bagnis
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
41 of
94)
96
Total Points Won
94
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Nick Hardt
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
69%
(
38 of
55)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
22 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
58%
(
45 of
78)
1st Serve %
76%
(
77 of
101)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
49%
(
22 of
45)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
51%
(
40 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
54 of
101)
92
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Nicholas David Ionel
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
84%
(
51 of
61)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
22 of
38)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
19 of
51)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
50%
(
31 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Valentin Royer
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
41 of
65)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
28 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Hardt
Player
Quentin Halys
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
51%
(
51 of
100)
1
Aces
9
9
Double Faults
4
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
31%
(
11 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
47%
(
47 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
100)
97
Total Points Won
103
|
7-5 1-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Michiel De Krom
Player
Nick Hardt
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
32 of
63)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
54%
(
27 of
50)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
48%
(
33 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Marko Stakusic Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 | 1-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Marko Stakusic
Player
Miguel Angel Cabrera
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
67
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 3-6 11-9 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-0 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gabi Adrian Boitan
Player
Marko Stakusic
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vito Tonejc
Player
Marko Stakusic
73%
(
46 of
63)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
29%
(
5 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
19 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
61
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 6-3 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Christopher Bulus
Player
Marko Stakusic
79%
(
42 of
53)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
45%
(
5 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
38%
(
20 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
68
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Hardt Vs Stakusic Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
