Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Chappell vs Tak Khunn Wang Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Wang analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Tak Khunn Wang Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 49.45% of points on his second serve, while Wang has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 52.47% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wang has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 56.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wang has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 51.9% of matches played (W/L 41/ 38), with Wang winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 216/ 147), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Wang has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 75/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 47/ 58).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.64% of matches (W/L 28/ 16), where as Wang has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chappell winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chappell winning 1 and Wang winning 2. The last match between Chappell and Wang was at the Salinas 2 Challenger, 28-04-2021, First, Hard with Tak Khunn Wang getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:56:16.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Wang have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chappell winning 0 times and Wang 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 0, and Wang 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 255.27 while Wang has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wang has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 41.83% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wang has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chappell 0 - 1 Wang
443
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
859
Rank
265
High
32
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
Form
L
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
53% (300-264)
Career Total W/L
58% (337-244)
41% (9-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nick Chappell | Tak Khunn Wang |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 12 | 16 |
| Aces (Total) | 6 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:56:16 | 2:56:16 |
| 1st Serve % | 71% (60/85) | 63% (62/99) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 55% (33/60) | 55% (34/62) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 44% (11/25) | 51% (19/37) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 36% (5/14) | 70% (7/10) |
| Return Points W% | 46% (46/99) | 48% (41/85) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-1 7-5 |
Stats 
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Nick Chappell
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
0
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
3
55%
(
34 of
62)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Chappell | Tak Khunn Wang |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 41% (9/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 42% (21/29) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (222/243) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.18 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 40 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:43:29 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 291.23 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (914/1483) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (594/914) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 47% (270/569) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (63/162) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 40% (611/1543) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 41% (9/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 80% (10/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 20% (10/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 8% (12/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
49 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
60 of
100)
9
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
40 of
60)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
7-6(4) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Nick Chappell
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
63%
(
12 of
19)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
57
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
24 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
41%
(
20 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
62 of
104)
1st Serve %
57%
(
62 of
108)
10
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
1
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
42 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
108)
109
Total Points Won
103
|
4-6 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Nick Chappell
71%
(
60 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
47 of
71)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Tak Khunn Wang Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
52%
(
45 of
86)
1st Serve %
60%
(
47 of
78)
15
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
31 of
47)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
31 of
78)
91
Total Points Won
73
|
6-1 6-7(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Baptiste Crepatte
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
1
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
44%
(
29 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
41 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Yannick Mertens
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Philip Florig
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
40 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
6-0 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxence Broville
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
33 of
47)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
20%
(
8 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Louis Wessels
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
70%
(
79 of
113)
1st Serve %
56%
(
64 of
115)
22
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
77%
(
61 of
79)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
29%
(
33 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
40 of
115)
120
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Matt Ponchet
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve %
50%
(
35 of
70)
2
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
27%
(
4 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tak Khunn Wang
Player
Leopold Zima
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Antoine Bellier
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
64%
(
54 of
85)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
78)
17
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
35 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
27 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
78)
86
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mick Veldheer
Player
Tak Khunn Wang
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
24 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
21 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Chappell Vs Wang Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
