Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Nick Chappell vs Sebastian Fanselow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Chappell vs Fanselow analysis and find out who is favored!
Nick Chappell vs Sebastian Fanselow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Chappell 1 - 0 Fanselow
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Chappell has won 50% of points on his second serve, while Fanselow has won 49.76%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Chappell, in recent form, has won 50.5% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fanselow has won 51.11%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.87% and 30.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Chappell has saved 58.6% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fanselow has saved 60.09% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Chappell has won 53.01% of matches played (W/L 44/ 39), with Fanselow winning 62.07% (W/L 54/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Chappell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 217/ 148), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Fanselow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 204/ 118), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 52% (W/L 33/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Chappell has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 63.27% of matches (W/L 31/ 18), where as Fanselow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 33/ 11). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Chappell winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Chappell winning 2 and Fanselow winning 1. The last match between Chappell and Fanselow was at the Houston Challenger, 12-11-2019, First, Hard with Nick Chappell getting the victory 6-1 3-6 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:8:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Chappell and Fanselow have played a deciding set 1 times, with Chappell winning 1 times and Fanselow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Chappell winning 1, and Fanselow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Chappell has played against opponents with an average rank of 238.65 while Fanselow has played against players with an average rank of 234.86.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Chappell has won 38% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fanselow has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Chappell has converted 41.1% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fanselow has converted 34.51% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Chappell 1 - 0 Fanselow
436
Rank
329
High
31
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
298
Rank
273
High
32
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
W
53% (303-266)
Career Total W/L
61% (355-231)
44% (12-15)
YTD W/L
53% (18-16)
$24,525
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Nick Chappell | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:8:6 | 2:8:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (66/105) | 66% (59/89) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 67% (44/66) | 71% (42/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 62% (24/39) | 53% (16/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 38% (3/8) | 15% (2/13) |
| Return Points W% | 35% (31/89) | 35% (37/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 3-6 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Nick Chappell
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
63%
(
66 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
59 of
89)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
62%
(
24 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
35%
(
37 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
31 of
89)
99
Total Points Won
95
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Nick Chappell | Sebastian Fanselow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (12/15) | 53% (18/16) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 45% (28/34) | 50% (39/39) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (283/292) | 50% (388/389) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (9/9) | 47% (7/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (3/3) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 40% (2/3) | 62% (8/5) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.24 | 0.38 |
| Aces Total | 68 | 146 |
| DFs per game | 0.17 | 0.25 |
| DFs Total | 49 | 97 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:47:6 | 1:46:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 237.3 | 245.74 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1146/1840) | 58% (1357/2331) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (764/1146) | 71% (961/1357) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (341/694) | 50% (483/974) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (79/197) | 36% (87/244) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (747/1899) | 38% (930/2422) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 25% (2/6) | 46% (11/13) |
| Futures W/L | 53% (10/9) | 67% (6/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (12/27) | 52% (17/33) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/7) | 44% (7/16) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 64% (7/11) |
| 1st set W, W | 77% (13/10) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 23% (13/3) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (14/2) | 17% (18/3) |
Nick Chappell Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Rodrigo Pacheco Mendez
Player
Nick Chappell
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Kousuke Ogura
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Andres Delgadillo
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
70%
(
42 of
60)
10
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
7 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
34 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Alan Fernando Rubio Fierros
Player
Nick Chappell
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
29 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
83
|
2-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Elijah Strode
70%
(
74 of
105)
1st Serve %
49%
(
50 of
102)
2
Aces
14
0
Double Faults
10
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
31 of
52)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
24 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
30 of
102)
111
Total Points Won
96
|
6-7(17) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nathan Ponwith
Player
Nick Chappell
60%
(
61 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
64 of
93)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
0
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
54%
(
22 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
36%
(
37 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
37 of
93)
102
Total Points Won
93
|
2-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Santiago Ruiz Velasco
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Dominik Palan
Player
Nick Chappell
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
63)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Nick Chappell
56%
(
62 of
111)
1st Serve %
60%
(
56 of
94)
15
Aces
3
10
Double Faults
4
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
42 of
56)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
32%
(
36 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
31 of
94)
106
Total Points Won
99
|
7-6(5) 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nick Chappell
Player
Jose Statham
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
48%
(
52 of
108)
11
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
13
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
108)
102
Total Points Won
102
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sebastian Fanselow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Thiago Agustin Tirante
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
75%
(
38 of
51)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
39 of
64)
33%
(
10 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
33 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
89
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 4-6 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Lucas Gerch
54%
(
47 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
62%
(
29 of
47)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
40%
(
16 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
11 of
32)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
48%
(
42 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
44 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Hans Rehberg
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
80%
(
37 of
46)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
65
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Luca Castagnola
43%
(
41 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
106)
2
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
9
88%
(
36 of
41)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
42 of
65)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
22%
(
4 of
18)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
47 of
106)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
15 of
26)
59%
(
16 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Maxime Cressy
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
27 of
56)
15
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
8 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Jakub Nicod
Player
Sebastian Fanselow
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
8
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
19%
(
8 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Sebastian Fanselow
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
57%
(
57 of
100)
12
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
3
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
43%
(
16 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
40%
(
36 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Chappell Vs Fanselow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
