Prediction of Nerman Fatic vs Tom Kocevar-Desman Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs T. Kocevar-Desman

Nerman Fatic

BIH

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

214

C. Rank

Ret.

191

Best Rank

349

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$675

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Tom Kocevar-Desman

SLO

2

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

5'11" (180 cm)

214

C. Rank

Ret.

191

Best Rank

349

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$675

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 2 - 0 Kocevar-Desman

They have played 5 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Tom Kocevar-Desman winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Tom Kocevar-Desman was at the M15 Opatija, 27-03-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-2.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	2
Kocevar-Desman	0

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R1) M15 Opatija(03-27-19)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Tom Kocevar-Desman

(R2) Bosnia & Herzegovina F1 (Doboj)(05-17-18)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Tom Kocevar-Desman

N. Fatic vs T. Kocevar-Desman H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	T. Kocevar-Desman
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$675
58.49% (403-286)	Career Total W/L	54.82% (239-197)
2	Clay	0
12	Titles	5
2	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs T. Kocevar-Desman Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 43.74% of points on their second serve, while Tom Kocevar-Desman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.50% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tom Kocevar-Desman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.83% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tom Kocevar-Desman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 75.00% of matches played (W/L 51/17), with Tom Kocevar-Desman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Tom Kocevar-Desman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 98/68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/17).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.86% of matches (W/L 24/13), where as Tom Kocevar-Desman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 2 times and Tom Kocevar-Desman being victorious 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 4 and Tom Kocevar-Desman winning 1.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Tom Kocevar-Desman was at the M15 Opatija, 27-03-2019, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 6-2.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:51:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 345.6 while Tom Kocevar-Desman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 89% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tom Kocevar-Desman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 34.78% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tom Kocevar-Desman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Tom Kocevar-Desman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs T. Kocevar-Desman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	T. Kocevar-Desman
2	H2H Matches Won	0
4	Sets Won	1
28	Games Won	19
14	Aces (Total)	0
9	Total Double Faults	8
1:51:0	Average Match Time	1:51:0
59% (70/119)	1st Serve %	58% (95/163)
73% (51/70)	1st Serve Win %	56% (53/95)
47% (23/49)	2nd Serve Win %	46% (31/68)
50% (12/24)	Break Pts Won %	64% (7/11)
48% (79/163)	Return Points Win %	38% (45/119)
100% (2/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/2)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats
Olbia Challenger - 13-10-2025
QF Hugo GrenierH. Grenier	L	6-3 6-4	Stats
R2 Carlo Alberto CaniatoC. Alberto	W	3-6 6-3 6-3	Stats

View All

T. Kocevar-Desman Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
M25 Vilnius - 17-01-2022
R1 David PoljakD. Poljak	L	4-6 6-4 6-1	Stats
Q3 Simonas ZukauskasS. Zukauskas	W	4-6 6-1 10-7	Stats
M15 Doha - 18-10-2021
QF Hanwen LiH. Li	L	6-4 4-6 6-1	Stats
R2 Digvijaypratap SinghD. Singh	W	7-5 6-3	Stats
R1 Zura TkemaladzeZ. Tkemaladze	W	6-1 6-1	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs T. Kocevar-Desman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	T. Kocevar-Desman
58.49% (403/286)	YTD Win/Loss	54.82% (239/197)
57.51% (888/656)	Sets Win/Loss	53.71% (528/455)
53.04% (7574/6706)	Games Win/Loss	52.10% (4666/4290)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	59.04% (98/68)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	54.55% (120/100)
43.18% (19/25)	Indoor Hard W/L	42.00% (21/29)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.18
1568	Aces Total	774
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.14
1510	Total Double Faults	605
1:19:52	Average Match Time	1st Match
509.43	Average Opponent Rank	600.75
66% (23679/35628)	1st Serve %	58% (8116/14096)
65% (15504/23679)	1st Serve Win %	69% (5615/8116)
48% (5733/11949)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (2984/5980)
47% (1961/4201)	Break Points Won % (Total)	43% (643/1501)
43% (15552/35990)	Return Points Win %	40% (5982/14783)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0% (0/0)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	16.67% (1/5)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	33.33% (1/2)
52.91% (118/105)	Challenger W/L	33.33% (11/22)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	57.36% (226/168)
60% (394/661)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (237/425)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	0% (0/4)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	53% (65/122)
54% (102/188)	Deciding Set Win %	57% (64/113)
88% (393/347)	1st Set Won, Won Match	88% (235/207)
11% (393/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	12% (235/28)
19% (296/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	16% (201/32)