Nerman Fatic vs Roberto Carballes Baena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 10:58 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs R. Carballes Baena

BIH
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Baena
They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Roberto Carballes Baena winning 0. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Roberto Carballes Baena was at the Olbia Challenger, 14-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-2 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fatic | 1 |
| Baena | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Olbia Challenger(10-14-25)
N. Fatic vs R. C. Baena H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $73,995 | Career Prize Money | $3,200,505 |
| 58.47% (404-287) | Career Total W/L | 58.29% (594-425) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 12 | Titles | 24 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (12-18) |
N. Fatic vs R. C. Baena Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Roberto Carballes Baena has won 43.84% of second serve points in recent months, slightly less than Nerman Fatic's 43.97%. Could this small difference impact the game outcome?
- Return Game Efficiency: Carballes Baena shows superior return performance, winning 47.12% on opponents' second serves compared to Fatic's 43.76%, and performs slightly worse on first serves with 27.22% against Fatic's 28.97%.
- Breakpoint Saves: Carballes Baena has excelled in pressure situations, saving 59.80% of breakpoints, whereas Fatic saves 54.80%.
- Recent Performance: Over the last year, Fatic has a higher match win rate at 76.56% compared to Carballes Baena's 42.55%. Is this a key advantage for Fatic?
- Preferred Surface: Both players show optimal results on clay with a 62% win rate, yet neither excels on grass, Fatic notably hasn't won a single grass match.
- Competition Level: Carballes Baena competes primarily on the Main tour, achieving a win rate of 33.33%, contrasted with Fatic’s 66.67% in Challengers/ITF events. How does opponent level influence this contrast?
- Opponent Rank: Carballes Baena faces tougher competition, playing opponents with an average rank of 139.26 compared to Fatic's 356.48.
- Deciding Sets: Though Carballes Baena wins 40% of deciding sets, Fatic impressively wins 89%, indicating possible resilience under tight match conditions.
- Event Specific Performance: Analyze current event stats when available for a comprehensive view of player form and potential performance specificity.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Roberto Carballes Baena and Nerman Fatic is poised to be a closely contested battle. Both players excel on clay and attempt to leverage their preferred surface advantage.
Roberto Carballes Baena's stronger return game and ability to handle pressure by saving breakpoints provide him with tactical benefits in crucial game phases. However, his recent lower win rate and facing more significant competition could mean vulnerabilities underlie his statistics.
Nerman Fatic's remarkable win percentage in deciding sets suggests a tenacity and ability to perform well during tight, pivotal moments. Despite competing at lower tournament levels, his higher overall match win rate and better performance in clutch scenarios make him a formidable opponent.
Based on the analysis, Nerman Fatic is slightly more favored to win this upcoming tennis match due to his resilience and consistent performance over the past year across his match statistics.
Nerman Fatic vs Roberto Carballes Baena Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs R. C. Baena H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 10 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:41:57 | Average Match Time | 1:41:57 |
| 64% (42/66) | 1st Serve % | 55% (37/67) |
| 81% (34/42) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (20/37) |
| 29% (7/24) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (14/30) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 49% (33/67) | Return Points Win % | 38% (25/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
R. C. Baena Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 7-5 | ||
R2 | L | 5-7 4-1 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 3-0 ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||

N. Fatic vs R. C. Baena Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.47% (404/287) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.29% (594/425) |
| 57.49% (890/658) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.14% (1358/1061) |
| 53.03% (7602/6734) | Games Win/Loss | 52.74% (11934/10694) |
| 51.19% (43/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 38.98% (46/72) |
| 61.00% (341/218) | Clay Win/Loss | 62.20% (515/313) |
| 43.48% (20/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 53.06% (26/23) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 29.17% (7/17) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.17 |
| 1598 | Aces Total | 1880 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 1517 | Total Double Faults | 2068 |
| 1:20:1 | Average Match Time | 1:26:42 |
| 509.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 169.48 |
| 66% (23791/35820) | 1st Serve % | 63% (36502/57755) |
| 65% (15579/23791) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (24357/36502) |
| 48% (5772/12029) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (10727/21249) |
| 47% (1969/4222) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (2651/6035) |
| 43% (15618/36165) | Return Points Win % | 41% (23707/58005) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 36.07% (22/39) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 40.58% (28/41) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 100.00% (1/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 50.39% (129/127) |
| 52.89% (119/106) | Challenger W/L | 61.70% (261/162) |
| 63.24% (277/161) | Futures W/L | 73.56% (153/55) |
| 60% (394/662) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (559/946) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 37% (19/52) |
| 51% (79/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (142/294) |
| 54% (102/189) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (171/329) |
| 88% (394/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (602/500) |
| 11% (394/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (602/100) |
| 19% (297/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (416/89) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Kimberly Birrell vs Talia Gibson Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 22nd November 2025 Best Bets

Flavio Cobolli vs Zizou Bergs Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, SF, ITA – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Oksana Selekhmeteva vs Jeline Vandromme Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Maria Lourdes Carle vs Mayar Sherif Prediction – WTA LP Open by IND – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets
