Nerman Fatic vs Domagoj Biljesko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fatic vs Biljesko analysis and find out who is favored!
Nerman Fatic vs Domagoj Biljesko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fatic has won 47.76% of points on his second serve, while Biljesko has won 38.24%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fatic, in recent form, has won 46.69% of his opponent's second serve points, while Biljesko has won 47.22%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.08% and 34.62% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fatic has saved 56.99% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Biljesko has saved 70.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fatic has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Biljesko winning 18.75% (W/L 3/ 13) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 279/ 189), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Biljesko has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 54% (W/L 37/ 32), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 38% (W/L 5/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 24/ 24), where as Biljesko has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 18.75% of matches (W/L 3/ 13). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Fatic winning 3 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Fatic winning 6 and Biljesko winning 0. The last match between Fatic and Biljesko was at the M15 Antalya, 18-02-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Nerman Fatic getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Fatic and Biljesko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Fatic winning 0 times and Biljesko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Fatic winning 1, and Biljesko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 273.17 while Biljesko has played against players with an average rank of 81.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fatic has won 48% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Biljesko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fatic has converted 40.89% of breakpoint opportunities, and Biljesko has converted 37.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Fatic 3 - 0 Biljesko
8
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
212
Rank
191
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total0
0
Hard0
3
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
882
Rank
751
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
57% (339-252)
Career Total W/L
53% (207-183)
40% (6-9)
YTD W/L
25% (1-3)
$73,995
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Nerman Fatic | Domagoj Biljesko |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 3 | 0 |
Sets Won | 6 | 0 |
Games Won | 37 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 15 |
Avg Match Time | 1:17:20 | 1:17:20 |
1st Serve % | 72% (92/128) | 55% (81/148) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (61/92) | 62% (50/81) |
2nd Serve Win% | 56% (20/36) | 36% (24/67) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 44% (4/9) |
Return Points W% | 50% (74/148) | 37% (47/128) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/3) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (3/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-3 | |||||
6-3 6-1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
45%
(
25 of
56)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
60%
(
15 of
25)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
10 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
60
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
6-4 7-6(5) |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
77%
(
67 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
56 of
92)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
14 of
36)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
34 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Nerman Fatic | Domagoj Biljesko |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 40% (6/9) | 25% (1/3) |
Sets Win/Loss | 43% (15/20) | 45% (5/6) |
Games Win/Loss | 46% (150/179) | 48% (52/57) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (2/6) | 25% (1/3) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.43 | 0.02 |
Aces Total | 70 | 1 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.24 |
DFs Total | 33 | 13 |
Avg Match Time | 1:33:7 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 343.87 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (574/926) | 68% (71/105) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (393/574) | 63% (45/71) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (167/352) | 38% (13/34) |
BPs Won% Total | 33% (27/81) | 38% (3/8) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (360/982) | 40% (35/88) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 30% (3/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 25% (1/3) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 40% (6/15) | 25% (1/4) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/3) |
1st set W, W | 71% (7/5) | 33% (3/1) |
1st set W, L | 29% (7/2) | 67% (3/2) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Nerman Fatic Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Alejandro Moro Canas
Player
Nerman Fatic
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Edoardo Lavagno
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve %
64%
(
36 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
23 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
57 of
78)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
85)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
2
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Riccardo Bonadio
Player
Nerman Fatic
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
58%
(
29 of
50)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
55%
(
22 of
40)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
29 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Nerman Fatic
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
21 of
51)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dimitar Kuzmanov
Player
Nerman Fatic
66%
(
39 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
52 of
74)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
70%
(
14 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-0 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Franco Agamenone
Player
Nerman Fatic
73%
(
66 of
91)
1st Serve %
56%
(
50 of
89)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
13 of
39)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
97
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Pablo Llamas Ruiz
69%
(
59 of
86)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
9
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jakub Mensik
Player
Nerman Fatic
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
20 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Goncalo Oliveira
65%
(
56 of
86)
1st Serve %
69%
(
49 of
71)
9
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
40 of
49)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
26 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
16 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Domagoj Biljesko Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Kevin Humpfner
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
59%
(
52 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
71 of
105)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
13
65%
(
34 of
52)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
45 of
71)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
40%
(
35 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
105)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 2-6 6-4 10-5 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Niksa Arsic
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
48 of
80)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
8
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
30 of
48)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Matej Dodig
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
18 of
25)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
57)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Fausto Tabacco
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
53%
(
36 of
68)
1st Serve %
65%
(
55 of
84)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
20 of
55)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
71%
(
10 of
14)
Break Points Won
90%
(
9 of
10)
57%
(
38 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
52 of
85)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Romeo Hadzimehmedovic
Player
Domagoj Biljesko
50%
(
59 of
117)
1st Serve %
60%
(
69 of
115)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
11
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
59%
(
34 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
40%
(
47 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
53 of
115)
123
Total Points Won
109
|
5-7 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-3 5-7 10-7 | H2H |
view more