Nerman Fatic vs Daniel Masur Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs D. Masur

Nerman Fatic

BIH

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

212

C. Rank

521

191

Best Rank

176

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$156.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Daniel Masur

GER

1

Win

Played

0

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'0" (183 cm)

212

C. Rank

521

191

Best Rank

176

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$156.2K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Masur

They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Daniel Masur winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Daniel Masur was at the Zagreb Challenger, 10-05-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	1
Masur	0

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R1) Zagreb Challenger(05-10-22)

Stats

Nerman Fatic

Daniel Masur

N. Fatic vs D. Masur H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	D. Masur
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$156,200
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	56.70% (423-323)
1	Clay	0
12	Titles	15
1	Total H2H Matches	0
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0.00% (0-2)

N. Fatic vs D. Masur Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.96% of points on their second serve, while Daniel Masur has won 43.63%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Daniel Masur has won 44.26%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.53% and 25.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Daniel Masur has saved 49.79% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Daniel Masur winning 46.00% (W/L 23/27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Daniel Masur has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 96/73), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 41% (W/L 9/13).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Daniel Masur has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.65% of matches (W/L 18/19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Daniel Masur being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Daniel Masur winning 1.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Daniel Masur was at the Zagreb Challenger, 10-05-2022, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 3-6 6-2 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:54:28.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.03 while Daniel Masur has played against players with an average rank of 387.18.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Daniel Masur has won 27% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 30.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Daniel Masur has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Daniel Masur Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs D. Masur H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	D. Masur
1	H2H Matches Won	0
2	Sets Won	1
15	Games Won	9
3	Aces (Total)	1
7	Total Double Faults	10
1:54:28	Average Match Time	1:54:28
63% (50/79)	1st Serve %	58% (46/79)
72% (36/50)	1st Serve Win %	59% (27/46)
28% (8/29)	2nd Serve Win %	36% (12/33)
54% (7/13)	Break Pts Won %	57% (4/7)
51% (40/79)	Return Points Win %	44% (35/79)
100% (1/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	0% (0/1)
100% (1/1)	Deciding Set Win %	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	100% (1/1)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

D. Masur Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
Q1 Sascha Gueymard WayenburgS. Gueymard	L	6-4 6-4	Stats
Bratislava 2 Challenger - 27-10-2025
Q1 Chris RodeschC. Rodesch	L	6-1 7-6(7)	Stats
Hamburg Challenger - 20-10-2025
Q1 Sander JongS. Jong	L	7-5 6-3	Stats
Tiburon Challenger - 29-09-2025
R1 Mitchell KruegerM. Krueger	L	2-6 6-4 6-2	Stats
Q3 Luca CastagnolaL. Castagnola	W	6-0 7-6(3)	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs D. Masur Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	D. Masur
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	56.70% (423/323)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	55.47% (973/781)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	52.29% (8839/8065)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	56.80% (96/73)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	55.11% (151/123)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	59.43% (167/114)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	40.91% (9/13)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.38
1598	Aces Total	3125
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.24
1517	Total Double Faults	1962
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:20:15
509.22	Average Opponent Rank	535.66
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	64% (28245/44260)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	71% (20106/28245)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	49% (7869/16015)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	41% (1731/4204)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	39% (17276/44702)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	43.48% (10/13)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	50.00% (1/1)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0.00% (0/1)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	28.57% (12/30)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	52.53% (208/188)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	68.09% (192/90)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	56% (413/732)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	50% (3/6)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	48% (131/271)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	50% (131/264)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (432/351)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (432/80)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	22% (313/68)