Nerman Fatic vs Christopher Heyman Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs C. Heyman

Nerman Fatic
BIH
w
l
w
w
l
w
l
l
w
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
32
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
214
C. Rank
812
191
Best Rank
258
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$74.0K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed

Christopher Heyman
BEL
l
l
w
w
l
w
l
w
l
l
1
Win
1
Played
0
Win
31
Age
32
6'3" (191 cm)
Height
6'3" (191 cm)
214
C. Rank
812
191
Best Rank
258
0
Total Titles
0
0
YTD Titles
0
$74.0K
Career Money
$0
Right-Handed
Plays
Left-Handed
Head-to-head: Fatic 1 - 0 Heyman
They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Christopher Heyman winning 1. The last match between Nerman Fatic and Christopher Heyman was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1, 27-05-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fatic | 1 |
| Heyman | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Bosnia & Herzegovina F1(05-27-13)
Nerman Fatic
6
6
6
Christopher Heyman
7
3
2
N. Fatic vs C. Heyman H2H Profile
N. Fatic vs C. Heyman Match Preview:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.18% of points on their second serve, while Christopher Heyman has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.34% of their opponent's second serve points, while Christopher Heyman has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.45% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 54.12% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Christopher Heyman has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 73.91% of matches played (W/L 51/18), with Christopher Heyman winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Christopher Heyman has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 113/58), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 42/31).
- Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Christopher Heyman has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 1 times and Christopher Heyman being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 2 and Christopher Heyman winning 1.
- The last match between Nerman Fatic and Christopher Heyman was at the Bosnia & Herzegovina F1, 27-05-2013, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Nerman Fatic getting the victory 6-7(2) 6-3 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 338.61 while Christopher Heyman has played against players with an average rank of 0.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 84% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Christopher Heyman has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 33.71% of breakpoint opportunities, and Christopher Heyman has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Nerman Fatic vs Christopher Heyman Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Fatic vs C. Heyman H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Recent Performance Stats
2nd Serve Win %: Fatic 51%, Heyman 0%.
Opp 2nd Serve Pts Won: Fatic 53%, Heyman 0%.
Break Points Saved %: Fatic 61%, Heyman 0%.
N. Fatic Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 7-5 4-6 7-5 | ||
R1 | W | 6-4 6-6 ret. | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 7-6(2) ret. | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-3 | ||
C. Heyman Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | L | 6-3 7-6(4) | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 7-5 6-4 | ||
R1 | W | 4-1 ret. | ||

N. Fatic vs C. Heyman Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.47% (404/287) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.65% (352/201) |
| 57.49% (890/658) | Sets Win/Loss | 60.44% (767/502) |
| 53.03% (7602/6734) | Games Win/Loss | 54.57% (6451/5370) |
| 51.19% (43/41) | Hard Win/Loss | 66.08% (113/58) |
| 61.00% (341/218) | Clay Win/Loss | 61.11% (154/98) |
| 43.48% (20/26) | Indoor Hard W/L | 65.38% (85/45) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.23 | Aces Per Game | 0.2 |
| 1598 | Aces Total | 1139 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 1517 | Total Double Faults | 887 |
| 1:20:1 | Average Match Time | 1:18:55 |
| 509.29 | Average Opponent Rank | 560.41 |
| 66% (23791/35820) | 1st Serve % | 69% (19517/28466) |
| 65% (15579/23791) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (13201/19517) |
| 48% (5772/12029) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (4639/8949) |
| 47% (1969/4222) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (1323/2869) |
| 43% (15618/36165) | Return Points Win % | 41% (11509/28052) |
| 20.00% (1/4) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 25.00% (3/9) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 52.89% (119/106) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (26/39) |
| 63.24% (277/161) | Futures W/L | 66.80% (326/162) |
| 60% (394/662) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 64% (343/540) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 51% (79/156) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 51% (86/169) |
| 54% (102/189) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (99/166) |
| 88% (394/348) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (339/301) |
| 11% (394/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (339/38) |
| 19% (297/57) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (214/51) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Fri, 21 Nov, 11:45 AM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 12:05 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 12:30 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 02:00 PM
PredictionFri, 21 Nov, 06:30 PM
PredictionTennis Previews & Betting Tips

21 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Kimberly Birrell vs Ya-Yi Yang Prediction – WTA W75 Sydney – 21st November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Sydney Challenger Preview And Prediction: James McCabe vs Rinky Hijikata Betting Tips & Picks November 21, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Eva Bennemann vs Elena Gabriela Ruse Prediction – WTA W75 Petange – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Bergamo Challenger Preview And Prediction: Mark Lajal vs Justin Engel Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →Jaume Antoni Munar Clar vs Jiri Lehecka Prediction – ATP Davis Cup, World Group, QF, ESP – 20th November 2025 Best Bets

20 Nov 2025
Read Full Article →LP Open by IND – Colina Preview And Prediction: Laura Pigossi vs Leolia Jeanjean Betting Tips & Picks November 20, 2025
Top Predictions Today
14:00
H2H 1-0
20:00
H2H 0-1
12:05
H2H 0-0
15:30
H2H 0-0
Tennis Events This Week
Bergamo Challenger
Italy
Florianopolis Challenger
Brazil
Guayaquil Challenger
Ecuador
Montemar Challenger
Spain
Soma Bay Challenger
Egypt
Sydney Challenger
Australia
Yokohama Challenger
Japan
M15 Alcala de Henares
Spain
M15 Monastir
Tunisia
M15 Olavarria
Argentina
M15 Santiago
Chile
M15 Sharm ElSheikh
Egypt
M25 Antalya
Turkey
M25 Austin
United States
M25 Cochabamba
Bolivia
M25 Heraklion
Greece
M25 Luanda
Angola
M25 Vale do Lobo
Portugal