Nerman Fatic vs Carlos Gimeno Valero Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
N. Fatic vs C. Gimeno Valero

Nerman Fatic

BIH

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

212

C. Rank

719

191

Best Rank

259

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$4.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Carlos Gimeno Valero

ESP

0

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

6'3" (191 cm)

Height

6'3" (191 cm)

212

C. Rank

719

191

Best Rank

259

Total Titles

YTD Titles

$74.0K

Career Money

$4.0K

Right-Handed

Plays

Right-Handed

Head-to-head: Fatic 0 - 1 Valero

They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 0 and Carlos Gimeno Valero winning 2. The last match between Carlos Gimeno Valero and Nerman Fatic was at the Zagreb Challenger, 11-05-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Carlos Gimeno Valero getting the victory 6-3 6-1.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Fatic	0
Valero	1

Last 1 H2H Matches:

(R2) Zagreb Challenger(05-11-22)

Stats

Carlos Gimeno Valero

Nerman Fatic

N. Fatic vs C. G. Valero H2H Profile

N. Fatic	Stats	C. G. Valero
$73,995	Career Prize Money	$3,960
58.47% (404-287)	Career Total W/L	65.10% (125-67)
0	Clay	1
12	Titles	7
0	Total H2H Matches	1
0.00% (0-1)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

N. Fatic vs C. G. Valero Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Nerman Fatic has won 44.96% of points on their second serve, while Carlos Gimeno Valero has won 15.38%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Nerman Fatic, in recent form, has won 45.79% of their opponent's second serve points, while Carlos Gimeno Valero has won 29.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.53% and 12.50% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Nerman Fatic has saved 53.66% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Carlos Gimeno Valero has saved 42.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Nerman Fatic has won 72.31% of matches played (W/L 47/18), with Carlos Gimeno Valero winning 0% (W/L 0/1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Nerman Fatic has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 61% (W/L 341/218), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/2). Carlos Gimeno Valero has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 8/4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 1/1).
Player level: In the last year, Nerman Fatic has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 64.10% of matches (W/L 25/14), where as Carlos Gimeno Valero has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 0.00% of matches (W/L 0/1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Nerman Fatic winning 0 times and Carlos Gimeno Valero being victorious 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Nerman Fatic winning 0 and Carlos Gimeno Valero winning 2.
The last match between Nerman Fatic and Carlos Gimeno Valero was at the Zagreb Challenger, 11-05-2022, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Carlos Gimeno Valero getting the victory 6-3 6-1.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:39.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Nerman Fatic has played against opponents with an average rank of 326.03 while Carlos Gimeno Valero has played against players with an average rank of 505.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Nerman Fatic has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Carlos Gimeno Valero has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Nerman Fatic has converted 30.72% of breakpoint opportunities, and Carlos Gimeno Valero has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Nerman Fatic vs Carlos Gimeno Valero Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

N. Fatic vs C. G. Valero H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

N. Fatic	Stats	C. G. Valero
0	H2H Matches Won	1
0	Sets Won	2
4	Games Won	12
2	Total Double Faults	6
1:17:39	Average Match Time	1:17:39
60% (36/60)	1st Serve %	64% (28/44)
44% (16/36)	1st Serve Win %	82% (23/28)
46% (11/24)	2nd Serve Win %	50% (8/16)
33% (1/3)	Break Pts Won %	42% (5/12)
30% (13/44)	Return Points Win %	55% (33/60)
0% (0/1)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/0)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/0)

Recent Performance Stats

N. Fatic Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Bergamo Challenger - 17-11-2025
R2 Federico ArnaboldiF. Arnaboldi	L	7-5 4-6 7-5	Stats
R1 Fabrizio AndaloroF. Andaloro	W	6-4 6-6 ret.	Stats
Helsinki Challenger - 03-11-2025
R1 Calvin HemeryC. Hemery	L	6-3 7-6(4)	Stats
M15 Bol - 20-10-2025
R2 Marko MiladinovicM. Miladinovic	L	7-6(2) ret.	Stats
R1 Antonio VoljavecA. Voljavec	W	6-2 6-3	Stats

View All

C. G. Valero Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Perugia Challenger - 09-06-2025
Q1 Oriol Roca BatallaO. Roca	L	6-1 6-2	Stats
Troyes Challenger - 01-07-2024
Q3 Neil OberleitnerN. Oberleitner	L	6-2 6-3	Stats
Q1 Paulo Saraiva Dos SantosP. Saraiva	W	3-6 6-4 7-5	Stats
M25 Cordoba - 03-06-2024
R2 Andrea GuerrieriA. Guerrieri	L	6-2 6-0	Stats
R1 Jaime CaldesJ. Caldes	W	6-4 6-3	Stats

View All

N. Fatic vs C. G. Valero Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

N. Fatic	Stats	C. G. Valero
58.47% (404/287)	YTD Win/Loss	65.10% (125/67)
57.49% (890/658)	Sets Win/Loss	61.30% (274/173)
53.03% (7602/6734)	Games Win/Loss	55.04% (2172/1774)
51.19% (43/41)	Hard Win/Loss	66.67% (8/4)
61.00% (341/218)	Clay Win/Loss	65.17% (116/62)
43.48% (20/26)	Indoor Hard W/L	50.00% (1/1)
0.00% (0/2)	Grass Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
0.23	Aces Per Game	0.09
1598	Aces Total	168
0.22	Double Faults Per Game	0.48
1517	Total Double Faults	925
1:20:1	Average Match Time	1:35:46
509.22	Average Opponent Rank	476.53
66% (23791/35820)	1st Serve %	69% (8537/12346)
65% (15579/23791)	1st Serve Win %	63% (5337/8537)
48% (5772/12029)	2nd Serve Win %	44% (1671/3809)
47% (1969/4222)	Break Points Won % (Total)	48% (819/1699)
43% (15618/36165)	Return Points Win %	47% (5975/12635)
20.00% (1/4)	Slam W/L	0% (0/0)
0.00% (0/1)	Masters W/L	0.00% (0/2)
40.00% (4/6)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
25.00% (3/9)	Main Tour W/L	33.33% (1/2)
52.89% (119/106)	Challenger W/L	58.33% (42/30)
63.24% (277/161)	Futures W/L	71.30% (82/33)
60% (394/662)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	66% (120/181)
0% (0/3)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	25% (1/4)
51% (79/156)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	51% (19/37)
54% (102/189)	Deciding Set Win %	58% (38/65)
88% (394/348)	1st Set Won, Won Match	83% (126/105)
11% (394/42)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	16% (126/20)
19% (297/57)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	27% (66/18)